- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/18/13 at 10:23 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
For a prestigious program like OH St to do this...pretty embarrassing.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 10:28 pm to USMC Gators
Like someone said before, I would assume it was for guys like John Simon that did nothing wrong, were seniors last year, and played their heart out.
I really don't have a problem with people doing this, who gives a shite. Just a bunch of hating for no reason.
I really don't have a problem with people doing this, who gives a shite. Just a bunch of hating for no reason.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:23 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
I could have sworn I was in the stadium when Alabama beat Notre Dame for the BCS NC
What the hell
What the hell
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:25 pm to alabamabuckeye
People keep blatantly ignoring that the top of the ring says "Leaders" for winning the division. 
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:28 pm to KillerNut9
Ohio State was eligible to win the division
I guess I didn't remember that.
I definitely don't have a problem with making rings then.
I guess I didn't remember that.
I definitely don't have a problem with making rings then.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:48 pm to KosmoCramer
Y'all are one of the blue blood cfb programs and should NOT be making rings for division "titles."
Posted on 4/19/13 at 12:45 am to USMC Gators
tOSU doesn't make rings for winning their damn division.
It says 12-0 in big numbers on it - it's a ring for going undefeated and claiming something bigger that the bowl restriction made easier.
Memorializing an undefeated season w/o a big OOC bowl isn't really up to Ohio State's standards but who really cares...its for the players.
It says 12-0 in big numbers on it - it's a ring for going undefeated and claiming something bigger that the bowl restriction made easier.
Memorializing an undefeated season w/o a big OOC bowl isn't really up to Ohio State's standards but who really cares...its for the players.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 12:48 am to USMC Gators
quote:
Y'all are one of the blue blood cfb programs and should NOT be making rings for division "titles."
A. We have no direct impact on what rings are or aren't handed out to players each season, so quit saying y'all as though you're shaming us for a decision we made.
B. Who gives a shite? The team's not claiming NCAA Champs.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 1:00 am to Zamoro10
You mad Ohio State beats dat Michigan arse all the time bro?
This post was edited on 4/19/13 at 1:01 am
Posted on 4/19/13 at 6:37 am to BuckeyeFan87
quote:
A. We have no direct impact on what rings are or aren't handed out to players each season, so quit saying y'all as though you're shaming us for a decision we made.
B. Who gives a shite? The team's not claiming NCAA Champs.
A. He means the school..not u and me and that seems pretty obvious.
B. He is absolutely fricking right. Its OSU not some 2nd tier school. Not to mention the fact that we were just railing on Indiana for the same thing in basketball.
Some hypocrites up in here.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 6:51 am to pvilleguru
quote:
The ring actually reads "Leaders Champions"
Exactly, while its somehow cool to hate OSU, why isn't this article accurate or why can't people here understand, they were Leader's Division Champs they are recognized as such, they got a trophy, they just couldn't play in the Big10 Title game... therefore, give the kids this honor and everyone stop being pathetic.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 7:15 am to nola tiger lsu
I normally wouldn't approve of things like this, but like I said before, I'm pretty sure Urban did this just to give the seniors something after they were punished for something none of them did and I have no problem with that. His crush on the senior class was pretty apparent.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 7:20 am to KillerNut9
quote:
I think it was more of a gesture to the seniors who got fricked over for doing absolutely nothing, but who knows.
I wouldn't say they got fricked over. If the team wasn't under sanctions maybe the mindset would have been different in some games and they lose, but now there is no way to know.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 7:22 am to goldenbadger08
quote:
Or Indiana's sweet 16 rings
Posted on 4/19/13 at 7:23 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
They got punished for something none of them did. I know that's how the NCAA operates, but they absolutely got fricked over.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 7:28 am to KillerNut9
quote:
They got punished for something none of them did. I know that's how the NCAA operates, but they absolutely got fricked over.
I don't like how the NCAA runs shite either, and to a degree they did get fricked over, but just saying we don't know if they would have been unbeaten under different circumstances, if they were they'd be National Champions right now and have the fear of Saban in them for Pasadena.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 8:18 am to KillerNut9
quote:
They got punished for something none of them did. I know that's how the NCAA operates, but they absolutely got fricked over.
Like the NCAA allowing the TAT6 to play in the Sugar Bowl when they should have been ineligible.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 8:47 am to Master of Sinanju
Apparently you didn't realize teams get rings for being in bowl games. The SEC champions get an SEC ring, a bowl ring that ends up being a national championship ring, and then another ring that is given specifically for winning the national championship by the BCS.
This post was edited on 4/19/13 at 8:48 am
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News