- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ohio State you should be angry w playoffs
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:35 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:35 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Ohio State you should be angry w playoffs by DisplacedBuckeyeOne is being played for a championship. The other has no impact on one.
You think OSU should be in over ND
1
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:36 am to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
tOSU would BEAT THE BREAKS off ND IDGAF that they lost by 29 to Purdue a few months ago thats just FACT
And I'm pretty sure UGA would beat tOSU, OU and ND comfortably. But the results on the field have to mean something.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 11:37 am
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:37 am to dukke v
quote:
You think OSU should be in over ND
I think that if the committee were consistent, it would be either...
1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. UCF
4. Notre Dame
...or...
1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Oklahoma
4. Ohio State
I'd be fine with either.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:38 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Simple question: do you think OSU should be in over ND? And if yes, do you think PSU should have been in over OSU in 2016?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:40 am to Buckeye Fan 19
Explain why you think those are comparable.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:40 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Why wouldn’t UCF be in for you in either scenario? They won their conference.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:41 am to Buckeye Fan 19
So did Alabama, Clemson, Oklahoma, and Ohio State.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:41 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Explain why you think those are comparable.
ND (non-conference champ) finished with one fewer loss than OSU (conference champ). OSU (non-conference champ) finished with one fewer loss than PSU (conference champ, who even beat OSU H2H). Seems pretty clear to me.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:42 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
So did Alabama, Clemson, Oklahoma, and Ohio State.
Only three of these beat every team on their schedule.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:43 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
ND (non-conference champ) finished with one fewer loss than OSU (conference champ). OSU (non-conference champ) finished with one fewer loss than PSU (conference champ, who even beat OSU H2H). Seems pretty clear to me.
Ok cool.
So I guess it's a good thing that more than "fewer losses" is supposed to be used.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:44 am to rbdallas
clearly losing by 29 weighed heavily
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:44 am to TideSaint
quote:
Only three of these beat every team on their schedule.
Cool. I also accounted for that one...
quote:
1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. UCF
4. Notre Dame
See...
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:45 am to choupiquesushi
Mullens said "inconsistencies" against Nebraska and Maryland were the biggest reason.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:45 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Why should OSU have gotten in over PSU in 2016? Answer that question.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:45 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
And if yes, do you think PSU should have been in over OSU in 2016?
Penn State lost 49-10 against Michigan. Same reason for excluding Ohio State this year AND Penn State had a second loss (Pitt) in 2016.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:46 am to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
Why should OSU have gotten in over PSU in 2016?
I didn't make that claim.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:46 am to rbdallas
quote:So nd has to play hockey in the acc?
They play BBall in the ACC and should play football there,
Nah.
You have no logic behind your statement. Bball therefore football is not compelling in and of itself and its all you've got.
It ain't necessarily so.
Nd has their own contract for football.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 11:48 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Fair enough.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:00 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
No shite. What does a game in 2017 have to do with 2018 again?
I was replying to a comment that moving to 8 games would not have purdue on the schedule, and an FCS team scheduled before the Michigan game would fix Ohio State's problem.
That wouldn't fix Ohio State's annual bed shitting.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:05 pm to Perrydawg
quote:
Either every team should be on an equal footing for games played once in the playoff (13 games unless affected by some other event: hurricanes, 9/11 type scenarios), or freeze the final rankings after rivalry weekend and do not count the Conference Championship Games into the determination of the final four.
agree 100% either all or none, even though it still favors the weak conferences in that the hardest game would be the final conference game....
my other problem was that they can use the ACC for BBall when convenient and then NOT use the ACC when it is not.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News