Started By
Message

re: Objective proof Michigan should have had the last play

Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:54 pm to
Posted by sBrodie
Member since Aug 2016
157 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:54 pm to
While I applaud your effort, note that typical broadcast labeled as 30 fps is really 29.97 fps. So you need to adjust your math some.
(by your method, the play would still be under 9 seconds, but a little closer)
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 3:59 pm
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31633 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

While I applaud your effort, note that typical broadcast labeled as 30 fps is really 29.97 fps. So you need to adjust your math some.


I wondered if/when someone would point that out. It makes .011 difference.

It is a moot point, all I showed is that the clock should have showed 0:01 but there are now multiple in-stadium videos that clearly show the defender catching the ball and 0:01 still showing on the stadium clock. Whether I like it or not, Michigan should have gotten the last play based solely on empirical evidence. We can move on to arguing about the non-reviewable issues like holding. Just kidding; almost nobody will change their opinion because they want it to be one way.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram