
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Objective proof Michigan should have had the last play
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:54 pm to Obtuse1
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:54 pm to Obtuse1
While I applaud your effort, note that typical broadcast labeled as 30 fps is really 29.97 fps. So you need to adjust your math some.
(by your method, the play would still be under 9 seconds, but a little closer)
(by your method, the play would still be under 9 seconds, but a little closer)
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:39 pm to sBrodie
quote:
While I applaud your effort, note that typical broadcast labeled as 30 fps is really 29.97 fps. So you need to adjust your math some.
I wondered if/when someone would point that out. It makes .011 difference.
It is a moot point, all I showed is that the clock should have showed 0:01 but there are now multiple in-stadium videos that clearly show the defender catching the ball and 0:01 still showing on the stadium clock. Whether I like it or not, Michigan should have gotten the last play based solely on empirical evidence. We can move on to arguing about the non-reviewable issues like holding. Just kidding; almost nobody will change their opinion because they want it to be one way.

Popular
Back to top

1








