- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Notre Dame recruiting has been insane lately
Posted on 7/17/21 at 3:14 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Posted on 7/17/21 at 3:14 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Nobody watches any of those except Miami (at times)
What would be the point or ROI of signing up players from schools that have little following?Who's lining up to get autographs from their players?
UGA is far more popular in metro Atl than GT.Hell,when AU was worth a shite,they probably had a bigger fan base than GT.
Same with Texas in Dallas
What would be the point or ROI of signing up players from schools that have little following?Who's lining up to get autographs from their players?
UGA is far more popular in metro Atl than GT.Hell,when AU was worth a shite,they probably had a bigger fan base than GT.
Same with Texas in Dallas
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 3:17 pm
1
Posted on 7/17/21 at 3:25 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Nobody watches any of those except Miami (at times)
What would be the point or ROI of signing up players from schools that have little following?Who's lining up to get autographs from their players?
UGA is far more popular in metro Atl than GT.Hell,when AU was worth a shite,they probably had a bigger fan base than GT.
Same with Texas in Dallas
Hey man, big city many can flourish
Posted on 7/17/21 at 3:54 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
Hey man, big city many can flourish
You actually think Rutgers,SMU and GT will "blow up?"
You honestly believe that companies/corporations are gonna spend on players that folks in either city barely recognize?
You might have a point if any of those schools were remotely popular or sold tickets.
I will say Tech and SMU players might get a NIL benefit because of their wealthy alumni base. SMU more so than GT.
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 7/17/21 at 3:56 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
You actually think those Rutgers,SMU and GT will "blow up?"
Yes
quote:
You honestly believe that companies/corporations are gonna spend on players that folks
Yes, they got a ton of money to go around
Example: Dallas can give money to SMU and UT
quote:
Tech and SMU players might get a NIL benefit because of their wealthy alumni base. SMU more so than GT.
See! That’s what I’m saying!
Posted on 7/17/21 at 4:09 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
Yes, they got a ton of money to go around
Example: Dallas can give money to SMU
Why, if nobody knows any of the players? Companies are just flush money down the toilet because they have it? Makes no sense
quote:
Tech and SMU players might get a NIL benefit because of their wealthy alumni base. SMU more so than GT.
See! That’s what I’m saying!
It's their best possible scenario but neither school will "blow up" because of it.
Aren't you the same guy who kept on insisting the NFL wouldn't sign a bigger TV contract because "If ya go woke ya go broke?" That was you wasn't it?
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 7/17/21 at 5:10 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Last time I checked one of your "facts"I proved you completely wrong.(Scholarship discussion)
Lol no you didn’t but cute
Posted on 7/17/21 at 5:23 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Why, if nobody knows who any of the players?
They’ve never had good teams. If they’re good people will know the players
quote:
Companies are just flush money down the toilet because they have it?
Yea because they don’t do that now…
quote:
Aren't you the same guy who kept on insisting the NFL wouldn't sign a bigger TV contract because "If ya go woke ya go broke?" That was you wasn't it?
Yes , i was very very wrong.
I had it in my signature, but That’s been a while so got rid of it
Posted on 7/17/21 at 5:24 pm to TheeRealCarolina
quote:
Lol no you didn’t but cute
LMAO
Dude has no clue what he’s talking about
Posted on 7/17/21 at 7:12 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
They’ve never had good teams. If they’re good people will know the players
What? SMU and GT? How old are you?
They still couldnt draw folks even when they had good teams.
Good people?
quote:
Yea because they don’t do that now…
Yeah most try to NOT flush money down the toilet
quote:
Yes , i was very very wrong.
I had it in my signature, but That’s been a while so got rid of it
And you still haven't learned your lesson about sports and economics.
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 7/17/21 at 7:20 pm to TheeRealCarolina
quote:
Last time I checked one of your "facts"I proved you completely wrong.(Scholarship discussion)
Lol no you didn’t but cute
Yea.I pretty much did.You made this
clueless statement:
quote:
College athletes use to be guaranteed a 4 year scholarship from the start but shark lawyers and dumbass media convinced them that one-year renewables were in their best interest
It's completely false and I provided a link and a specific quote when I replied. You then disappeared from the thread.
Do you have any grasp of reality?
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 7/17/21 at 7:24 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
LMAO
Dude has no clue what he’s talking about
Like NFL FB and TV contracts? Or the history of "four year" scholarships?
Proved both of you clowns wrong
Posted on 7/17/21 at 10:16 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Good people?
Sorry forgot the comma.
If they’re good, people will know the players
quote:
Yeah most try to NOT flush money down the toilet
Yet they still do.
quote:
And you still haven't learned your lesson about sports and economics.
I’m not sure what your talking about
But big cities will mean big dollars for other schools
Posted on 7/17/21 at 10:17 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Like NFL FB and TV contracts? Or the history of "four year" scholarships?
Proved both of you clowns wrong
No like Notre Dame being the national school
And NIL not helping schools in big cities
I said you were right on the TV contract thing. And I never commented about scholarships
Posted on 7/18/21 at 1:43 am to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
And NIL not helping schools in big cities
I’ll give you one. New Orleans is a big-ish city. Who’s gonna do more NIL from New Orleans, Tulane, UNO, or LSU?
Posted on 7/18/21 at 2:36 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
Marcus Freeman
247Sports - Marcus Freeman discusses recruiting, why he picked Notre Dame over LSU
Posted on 7/18/21 at 3:53 am to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
No like Notre Dame being the national school
And NIL not helping schools in big cities
Not quite sure what you're trying to say about ND but you're clueless if you don't think they have a national following and your equally clueless if you think city schools like GT,SMU and Rutgers will "blow up" with NIL.Theres zero logic behind both of those opinions.
quote:
And I never commented about scholarships
I was referring to the Real Carolina clown and I accidently replied to you about his completely inaccurate statement.
This post was edited on 7/18/21 at 3:55 am
Posted on 7/18/21 at 4:42 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
I’ll give you one. New Orleans is a big-ish city. Who’s gonna do more NIL from New Orleans, Tulane, UNO, or LSU?
LSU
Posted on 7/18/21 at 11:02 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Yea.I pretty much did.You made this
clueless statement:
Again, you don’t know your history.
Posted on 7/18/21 at 11:49 am to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
I’ll give you one. New Orleans is a big-ish city. Who’s gonna do more NIL from New Orleans, Tulane, UNO, or LSU?
LSU
Now expand that to every city out there.
NIL overall will be a reflection of fan engagement and eyeballs. Those eyes on every program are what gives the athletes’ NIL value for the most part
Posted on 7/18/21 at 12:17 pm to TheeRealCarolina
quote:
Yea.I pretty much did.You made this
clueless statement:
Again, you don’t know your history.
You keep repeating but provide zero evidence.You have no evidence to back up your statement and it's completely false.
Undisputed fact: Four year guaranteed athletic scholarships with NCAA schools didn't assist til 2012 and athletic scholarships never started out that way and nobody sued anyone to turn them into one year contracts.
There's no way in hell Bear Bryant would give out a four year "guaranteed" scholarship.They were never in a coaches best interest.
Now,certain teams and coaches may make a verbal agreement with kids that they wont yank their scholarships but nothing "guaranteed" and nothing in writing...it woulda been against the rules.
Either link me your history or quit pulling "facts" out yer arse
This post was edited on 7/18/21 at 12:31 pm
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News