Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

MLB: CBA agreement lowers draft pick based on high spending

Posted on 7/29/17 at 9:27 am
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 9:27 am
quote:

MLB’s new Collective Bargaining Agreement contains a previously unknown detail that could potentially affect teams that spend heavily, Baseball America’s J.J. Cooper writes. In addition to the luxury tax, the CBA includes two surcharge thresholds that could cost big spenders extra money and that could even lower their top draft picks.

The financial details of the surcharge thresholds were previously known. If a team spends above $217MM in 2018, it will receive an extra 12% tax in addition to the usual 20%, 30% or 50% luxury tax. If a team spends over $237MM, it will receive an extra 42.5% or 45% surcharge tax.

Beginning in 2018, there will be an extra penalty for teams in that second category, Cooper notes. A team that spends above $237MM will also have its top draft pick lowered ten spots, unless that pick is in the top six, in which case the team’s second pick will be lowered ten spots.

As Cooper points out, the new rule could be a significant deterrent to teams hoping to be among baseball’s biggest spenders, since teams are generally quite protective of early-round draft picks. The Dodgers, for example, have had payrolls above $237MM for the past several seasons. Under the new system, they would pay a very significant penalty for spending so heavily. Cooper notes that a $260MM payroll in 2018 would cost the Dodgers over $50MM in luxury tax, plus the lowered draft pick.




How will this change FA spending as teams don't want to commit X amount of dollars to one or two players knowing they get lower picks. Teams like the Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox, etc could be impacted now. Teams like the Cubs and Astros in the future as they have a lot of talented young kids who will be receiving new mega contracts in the future.
Posted by BCMCubs
Colorado
Member since Nov 2011
22146 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 9:37 am to
I feel like the Yankees and Dodgers will not change a thing.
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2264 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 11:11 am to
They couldn't have given a 3 or 4 year break in period? So much for Detroit shedding even a single bad contract at the deadline...
Posted by davy jones
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2009
365 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 11:35 am to
Tony Clark is spectacularly bad at his job. Marvin Miller must be rolling in his grave. I can't fathom how the players association thought a former player would be a better choice than a labor lawyer.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136799 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 11:49 am to
Good thing the Astros will never be close to worrying about this
Posted by Bumble Bee
Northwest, La
Member since Jan 2011
753 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 6:16 pm to
I'm not a fan of how MLB penalizes teams by withdrawing draft picks for signing certain free agents.

Realistically a team could loose their 1st Rd pick by signing a Free Agent, then get their 2nd lowered based on salary.

What a joke. Just put in a salary cap.
Posted by iamAG
Member since Aug 2015
3517 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 6:19 pm to
No hard salary cap. Up penalty, but raise the luxury tax number. That's my vote.
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69606 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 6:32 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/15/23 at 5:10 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram