Started By
Message

re: Lance Armstrong wants apology from 60 Minutes

Posted on 6/3/11 at 9:16 pm to
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7492 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

yes. He cheated. multiple times. pack up your yellow bracelet and Sheryl Crow CD's and move the frick on.


After reading what G. Hincappy said, it maybe sour grapes. He saw Lance take colored pills?,everyone was taking them? But I'm supposed to believe he was the only rider on US Postal that didn't!

He may be guilty but they are far from proving anything based on a man who has lied and admitted that he has lied.
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7492 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Um, yes Fact. If Lance wasn't doping, NO WAY NO HOW he'd win 7 frenchies.


You do know his main competitors in those races have tested positive.
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7492 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 9:22 pm to
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28156 posts
Posted on 6/4/11 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

his urine samples from the '99 Tour de France tested positive for EPO


The ones that were improperly stored and didn't have the required "b" sample to verify the test? Yeah that's what we should rely on as defamation for the greatest cyclist of an era...

Why wouldn't they retest his other samples were A and B are present? At what point will people go back and retest the remaining samples and you will be satisfied? ten years? 20?
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
17389 posts
Posted on 6/4/11 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

The ones that were improperly stored and didn't have the required "b" sample to verify the test? Yeah that's what we should rely on as defamation for the greatest cyclist of an era...


The simple fact is that Lance defiantly proclaims he's never tested postive for a drug test, when in fact he has.

quote:

Why wouldn't they retest his other samples were A and B are present?

The testing agency told Lance they would retest his samples, which he declined.

quote:

At what point will people go back and retest the remaining samples and you will be satisfied? ten years? 20?

I don't care enough to need satisfactory proof. I just know if I was completely innocent, I would demand every questionable sample of mine be retested numerous times and also pursue defamation suits rather than ask for meaningless apologies. Lance has stopped short of doing both, which is suspicious, regardless if you love him or hate him.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram