Started By
Message

re: KU is the greatest college basketball dynasty

Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:25 pm to
Posted by WaltTeevens
Santa Barbara, CA
Member since Dec 2013
10961 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:25 pm to
If Derrick Rose could have just made his fricking free throws.
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 6:26 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98971 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

If anyone knows about cheating... it's Paypal Cal :


Somebody’s throwing mighty big stones in the Phog Allen glass house.
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 6:30 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35482 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:32 pm to
There are like 8 bluebloods in CBB, so who really cares who is the best dynasty...I mean does it matter...and a dynasty doesn't last forever...a dynasty is a set amount of years constantly winning.

So nobody will ever surpass UCLA's dynasty. That ain't coming back.

Duke, Indiana, KU, UK, North Carolina...consistently good teams for the most part...but that's not a dynasty by definition, that's just a blueblood fielding good teams.

KU is no modern dynasty...

But KU is the #1 most important basketball program in US history and the #1 program in US history because of that.

Kansas University is baskeball USA. And I don't even like KU but programs like UCLA or North Carolina aren't touching them historically and neither is Indiana or Kentucky/Louisville.
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 6:34 pm
Posted by Amadeo
Member since Jan 2004
4814 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Kansas University is baskeball USA. And I don't even like KU but programs like UCLA or North Carolina aren't touching them historically and neither is Indiana or Kentucky/Louisville.

Historical fact is that Kentucky had three titles before KU won their first one in 1952. UK has an 8 to 3 title advantage and have for the most part maintained a certain excellence for 8 decades now.

I really don't understand how UK can't "touch" KU historically other than the fact that basketball was invented in Kansas by Naismith.
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 9:40 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:50 pm to
Yep, Kentucky has over twice as many titles, more Final Fours, more tourney wins, more wins, etc.
Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:53 pm to
Dude’s not even a KU fan. We only have 3 titles and no one that’s a Jayhawk would say Allen Field House instead of Fieldhouse
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:54 pm to
Are y'all ever gonna take down those stupid Helms banners?
Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

Historical fact is that Kentucky had three titles before KU one their first one in 1952. UK has an 8 to 3 title advantage and have for the most part maintained a certain excellence for 8 decades now.

I really don't understand how UK can't "touch" KU historically other than the fact that basketball was invented in Kansas by Naismith.



I assume he means actual history, not just winning. Adolph Rupp was a Jayhawk, that’s all that needs to be said
Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Are y'all ever gonna take down those stupid Helms banners?



Doubt it. I'm not a fan, but it is what it is.
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9639 posts
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:36 pm to
As soon as you get rid of that 1996 football banner.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram