Started By
Message

re: I'm hoping a Super Bowl will one day be decided by a controversial

Posted on 1/5/14 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 1:05 pm to
And I'm glad there are amusing little hall monitor grannies on this site for my amusement.
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17098 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 1:11 pm to
Not unlike the videos where you speak like a Southern version of Stuart Smalley are for my amusement.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/5/14 at 1:22 pm to
I'll add this to my opening argument.

Here's Cary Williams on why he horse collared Darren Sproles near the end of last night's game:

"He broke contain. I'm the safety valve there. I didn't want to dive, because if he steps out of my tackle, it's six points. I just wanted to get the man down, just give our defense a chance to get on the field and make a stop."

So, for the sake of consistency, why wasn't Sproles granted the yardage he would have gained without the penalty? Why should Williams be allowed the discretion of a 15 yard penalty versus a potential long gain but that privilege is denied to a defensive back? Why is it not even worse when Williams makes that decision when HIS penalty can physically hurt a player?


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram