- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hack a Shaq rule is dumb
Posted on 1/25/20 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 1/25/20 at 8:45 pm
When teams employ the hack a Dwight or hack a whoever, I say if that player doesn’t have the ball at the time the foul is committed, then the team who was fouled can choose whoever they want who was on the floor to shoot the free throws.
This shite is ridiculous.
This shite is ridiculous.
Posted on 1/25/20 at 8:49 pm to TBubba
The refs fricked it up too. 6ers got the foul in before the time dropped under 2 mins
Posted on 1/25/20 at 9:01 pm to TBubba
It used to be much worse before they changed the rule
Posted on 1/25/20 at 10:58 pm to TBubba
Learn to shoot free throws. Problem solved
Posted on 1/26/20 at 12:24 am to funnystuff
If you can't hit FTs, you don't deserve to be on the court in crunch time.
Don't like it? Hit the shots.
Don't like it? Hit the shots.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 12:41 am to TBubba
I remember when Dale Brown finally snapped about it and told Shaq to start punishing SEC centers and forwards. I remember Robert Horry backing up and letting Shaq dunk. I’m not taking an elbow to the face from Shaq.
As to the OP, I could live with your rule.
As to the OP, I could live with your rule.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 12:52 am to TBubba
Not a good rule proposal. The only reason a team ever chooses its free throw shooter is because they’re awarded a free throw when no one was fouled, so they have to choose a shooter.
Hacka-_____ doesn’t happen enough to warrant a rule change, but if it did, you could allow a team to turn a free thrown into an inbound in exchange for a timeout.
Hacka-_____ doesn’t happen enough to warrant a rule change, but if it did, you could allow a team to turn a free thrown into an inbound in exchange for a timeout.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 2:30 am to funnystuff
It makes no sense for a player who doesn’t have the ball to have to shoot the free throws. If he has the ball......fine......dont pass him the ball.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 7:41 am to TBubba
Sure it does. If you have two players jostling for position in the post and the defender pulls the offense player back, would you also let the team choose who gets to shoot the 1 and 1? It was the post player who was prevented from establishing scoring position, so it should be the post player who shoots the free throws.
Fouls happen away from the ball all the time and it’s always the player who gets fouled who shoots the free throws. Why should now be any different? To protect bad free throw shooters from having to learn a key component of the game? That makes zero sense.
Fouls happen away from the ball all the time and it’s always the player who gets fouled who shoots the free throws. Why should now be any different? To protect bad free throw shooters from having to learn a key component of the game? That makes zero sense.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 7:48 am to xiv
quote:
Hacka-_____ doesn’t happen enough to warrant a rule change,
Ummmmm
Posted on 1/26/20 at 9:36 am to TBubba
quote:The player who is fouled is rewarded with free throws.
It makes no sense for a player who doesn’t have the ball to have to shoot the free throws.
Can’t make much more sense than that.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 10:43 am to funnystuff
Yes I know it’s always the player who gets fouled when it’s away from the ball. I’m saying it shouldn’t necessarily be that way when it’s obvious shenanigans are taking place.
Posted on 1/26/20 at 11:15 am to TBubba
And I’m saying that it’s no more “shenanigans” than is intentionally fouling when down 3 with 20 seconds left. Sometimes it makes sense to intentionally foul. We shouldn’t change that for the sake of protecting mediocre skill sets
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News