- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Great Playoff Proposal
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Loosely based.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they don't do this
quote:
ever since UGA skull fricked them, i don't think they've crossed the MS river
Isn't that Hawaii you're talking about? Boise St. won a BCS bowl one year. I don't think the undefeated Hawaii from a few years back should have been in an 8 team playoff - just saying, some years there are undefeateds that COULD be great but go untested.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:16 am to MisterLuce
quote:
Isn't that Hawaii you're talking about?
2005 UGA beat BSU so bad in Athens that zabransky had to undergo psychological counseling. true story
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:16 am to MisterLuce
quote:That's probably my biggest justification for a playoff. Less deserving teams, in the eyes of the voters, but deserving nonetheless. One year that team will get "skull-fricked" and another year that team will rout Bama in the Sugar Bowl.
some years there are undefeateds that COULD be great but go untested.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:18 am to Beastwood
Give me 8, 16, 20, team playoff who cares.
I certainly don't give a shite about the "most deserving" team argument. I watch sports for ENTERTAINMENT!!
A playoff would certainly be more entertaining than the current BCS format, even if less likely to determine the "best team"
Im tired of watching Kansas vs VT or Hawaii vs Georgia in meaningless games
I certainly don't give a shite about the "most deserving" team argument. I watch sports for ENTERTAINMENT!!
A playoff would certainly be more entertaining than the current BCS format, even if less likely to determine the "best team"
Im tired of watching Kansas vs VT or Hawaii vs Georgia in meaningless games
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:19 am to tigerguy121
quote:
I certainly don't give a shite about the "most deserving" team argument. I watch sports for ENTERTAINMENT!!
most of the pro-playoff crowd shares this opinion
quote:
A playoff would certainly be more entertaining than the current BCS format, even if less likely to determine the "best team"
march madness syndrome
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
esp in CFB where you CONTROL YOUR OWN SCHEDULE
Uhh, no you don't. Conference schedules are determined by the conference. OOC games require two parties to the contract - if BSU wants to open up against USC they can only do it if USC wants to do the same.
quote:
you will be hard-pressed to find many years with 4 teams with legit arguments for an entitlement to play for a title
Name one year other than 2004 when that is actually the case.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:21 am to MisterLuce
quote:Boise could get a home-and-home with USC whenever they wanted!
Uhh, no you don't. Conference schedules are determined by the conference. OOC games require two parties to the contract - if BSU wants to open up against USC they can only do it if USC wants to do the same.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
march madness syndrome
65 teams out of a field of 347
vs
8 out of 120
That's 18% getting in vs. 6.7%.
Big difference IMO.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:22 am to Gmorgan4982
quote:
Boise could get a home-and-home with USC whenever they wanted!
I was talking about how they couldn't schedule quality opponents - not shitty has beens.
This post was edited on 12/7/09 at 11:23 am
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:24 am to MisterLuce
quote:
if BSU wants to open up against USC they can only do it if USC wants to do the same.
TCU has no problem scheduling good OOC games. BYU also
the WAC teams always claim they're left out. hell even then, Hawaii got a home and home with USC
BSU is scared of a hard OOC for 3-4 games
quote:
Name one year other than 2004 when that is actually the case.
2004 is a year where you could have 4 teams with arguments (USC, OU, AU, Utah, BSU)
2005: 2 teams
2006: 2 teams
2007: 2 teams
2008: 3 teams
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:25 am to Gmorgan4982
quote:
Boise could get a home-and-home with USC whenever they wanted!
hawaii has
TCU and BYU always have 1-2 really good OOC games against BCS teams
FSU also
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
let's invite unworthy teams and if they frick up the system in games that aren't representative of the season, "oh well"
The NBA and NHL do this, as well as the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I'm not a fan of the NBA or NHL, but the NCAA tourney is the most popular sporting event in this country not named the Super Bowl. I'd prefer 8 teams or possibly 12 with "wild cards" like the NFL does, but this 16 team proposal kicks the shite out of the current system. Imagine a home playoff game in Tiger Stadium...that atmosphere would be unmatched in LSU's history.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:31 am to SlowFlowPro
Teams like Southern Miss, ULL, ULM, North Texas, Troy, Arkansas State, Central Michigan, New Mexico State, Idaho, Rice, Ohio, Toledo, etc., etc., etc., are not going to consistently get home-and-home series against the top BCS teams. You can point to your occasional home game that a non-BCS was able to negotiate but it isn't going to happen much.
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:31 am to medtiger
quote:
but the NCAA tourney is the most popular sporting event in this country
And the NCAA basketball regular season is one of the most unpopular sporting events int the country.
This post was edited on 12/7/09 at 11:32 am
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
2004 is a year where you could have 4 teams with arguments (USC, OU, AU, Utah, BSU)
2005: 2 teams
2006: 2 teams
2007: 2 teams
2008: 3 teams
The BCS' job is to put the top 2 teams in the Championship game. The only 2 years in the BCS' 11 year history where the top 2 teams were undisputed were 2002 and 2005. I can make an argument for at least 1 team outside of the top 2 in every other year.
quote:
And the NCAA basketball regular season is one of the most unpopular sporting events int the country.
The college FB regular season would be unaffected by an 8 team playoff or even this guy's 16 team playoff. If we were letting 64 teams in, then you'd have a point.
This post was edited on 12/7/09 at 11:36 am
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:39 am to medtiger
quote:
The NBA and NHL do this, as well
they have multiple-game series to rectify the problem
but yes, the NBA invites too many teams
quote:
s well as the NCAA Basketball Tournament
march madness - shite
quote:
but the NCAA tourney is the most popular sporting event in this country not named the Super Bowl.
i could be wrong, but i'm PRETTY sure the BCS title game gets more viewers than the NCAA title game in BB
quote:
Imagine a home playoff game in Tiger Stadium.
i'd like the revenue
the other teams in the SEC, however, would not
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:39 am to Gmorgan4982
quote:
are not going to consistently get home-and-home series
why do they deserve a home and home?
these teams get 1-game series all the time. those games fund their pitiful athletic departments
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:41 am to medtiger
quote:
The only 2 years in the BCS' 11 year history where the top 2 teams were undisputed were 2002 and 2005.
no
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2005
2006
2007
2008
that's batting a high arse %
i left out 2004 just to avoid the argument (even though nobody disputes USC as teh best team that year. one of the best of all time)
quote:'if you stretch badly
I can make an argument for at least 1 team outside of the top 2 in every other year.
quote:
The college FB regular season would be unaffected by an 8 team playoff or even this guy's 16 team playoff
bull fricking shite
if it's conference or bust, then there will be a ton of lost itnerest after week 5-6
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You're changing the argument here.
why do they deserve a home and home?
these teams get 1-game series all the time. those games fund their pitiful athletic departments
Popular
Back to top


0



