- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
MisterLuce
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 759 |
| Registered on: | 11/21/2009 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
Anyone else's car insurance premium going up?
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/28/09 at 1:36 pm
Mine went from 65 to 73 a month. I'm presently 32 and I haven't had any wrecks or moving violations since before I was 20.
WTF?
WTF?
re: Miles' Statement on Florida Coach Resignation
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/27/09 at 5:57 am to CRAZY 4 LSU
quote:
Miles' Statement on Florida Coach Resignation
That was coherent.
No fricking way he wrote that himself. Probably had his new clock manager do it.
re: What is your definition of a dynasty?
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/27/09 at 5:52 am to shel311
There are no dynasties in college football.
re: LSU did win the 2003 National Title
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/27/09 at 5:04 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Ctually for about a year after the BCS (BCS.org) called 2003 a "split decision with LSU winning the coach championship and USC the AP".
But only on of those two teams won the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME. usc won the Rose Bowl Championship, quite an accomplishment, but not a NATIONAL championship GAME.
re: LSU did win the 2003 National Title
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/27/09 at 5:02 am to Craig Ferguson
quote:
I could swear that this is a championship trophy as well.
It is a championship trophy, much like the SEC Championship trophy is a championship trophy.
It is not the NATIONAL championship trophy.
re: LSU did win the 2003 National Title
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/27/09 at 5:00 am to Craig Ferguson
quote:
The NCAA disagrees.
I dunno if you noticed,
BUT THE NCAA DOESN'T AWARD NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS TO FBS TEAMS
hence their opinion is irrelevant.
re: LSU did win the 2003 National Title
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/27/09 at 4:59 am to RightStuff169
quote:
LSU did win the 2003 National Title
Outright. OK. It was not a split title.
Done deal dude, that was 6 years ago, WTF?
But since you mentioned it...
my father's best friend took his son to see USC because he was thinking about going to school there. They took a tour of the school, and the tour guide of course at one point took them by the USC football trophy case. After she made her spiel, my father's friend asked her where the crystal football from the 2003 championship was. She looked at him confused as if she didn't know WTF, said I dunno, and moved the tour group onward.
This is how clueless USC fans are.
re: LSU lost the Florida on Defense
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/19/09 at 5:03 am to startshepard
quote:
we had 2 drives during the entire game that went for more than 6 plays.
6 plays 25 yds punt
5 plays 27 yds punt
3 plays 14 yds int
3 plays -12 yds punt
5 plays 4 yds punt(penalty)
4 plays 6 yds turnover on downs
I doubt your summary is correct, because its lacking 3 points.
Are you saying we scored those 3 in less than 6 plays?
It stands to reason then that had we had the extra 6:30 that would have made par possesion time, we could have pulled off two or three sub 6 play scoring drives.
re: LSU lost the Florida on Defense
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/19/09 at 5:02 am to startshepard
quote:
we had 2 drives during the entire game that went for more than 6 plays.
WE HAD 23:30 ON OFFENSE.
That's like playing a 47 minute game.
Florida's first drive was 8:11
WAS THAT OFFENSE's FAULT?
NO
re: LSU lost the Florida on Defense
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/19/09 at 4:43 am to Fgiord
quote:
I call BS. There is no way we only had 2 three and outs on O that game.
I don't know for sure but that number does not sound right.
ETA: Link?
LINK
re: LSU lost the Florida on Defense
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/19/09 at 4:33 am to Fgiord
quote:
Swing and a miss
In 2009, Florida burned 8:11 off the clock on their first drive.
In 2007 - guess how much LSU burned off the clock in their last drive?
8:11
I'm not kidding.
CLEARLY in the last two LSU-FL games, time of possession is the most important factor.
re: LSU lost the Florida on Defense
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/19/09 at 4:22 am to Guster
quote:
How many 3 and outs did our offense have?
2
LSU lost the Florida on Defense
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/19/09 at 2:37 am
LSU time of possession in 2009 LSU Florida game
23:30
LSU time of possession in 2007 LSU Florida game
35:52
Bend but don't break gives your offense no time to score.
Fire Chavis!
23:30
LSU time of possession in 2007 LSU Florida game
35:52
Bend but don't break gives your offense no time to score.
Fire Chavis!
re: Should it be a crime for credit card companies to go after..
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/8/09 at 9:43 am to LSURussian
quote:
I doubt the CC company did that unless the parent had signed guaranteeing the debt for their child. Are you sure you have all the facts?
I know for a fact they were chased for the credit card debt of their son. Perhaps it wasn't the CC company themselves but a collection agency. That would probably make more sense I guess, as collection agencies are known for scummy tactics.
quote:
ETA: A person's estate is made up of both assets and liabilities. The CC company can file a claim against the estate. Perhaps that is what happened?? As far as I know (and any estate attorney is better qualified to address this issue) any creditor can file a claim against the assets of a person's estate, limited to the value of the assets in the estate.
True that - but he had no net assets. There's no way his car was worth his debt. I guess they had a right to the car, but even in that case - shouldn't the collection agency/cc company be communicating with the attorney handling the estate and not the agrieved parents?
Just seemed kind of dick to me. I think if your a CC company handing out money to 18 year olds then you should understand you're taking a risk - if they pass unexpectedly they're unlikely to have much assets and/or life insurance - so if you're going to make that loan you should be prepared to eat it if they die.
Should it be a crime for credit card companies to go after..
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/8/09 at 9:03 am
...people's parents when they die? I had a friend who died young with about 15k in credit card debt. The credit card companies went after his parents, who were simple hard working Americans completely unaware of the fact that your debts die with you and they didn't owe the card companies a dime.
Either give us a playoff - or return to the old system.
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/7/09 at 11:38 am
The BCS sucks. I like that LSU has won it twice but its really just a coincidence its worked out in our favor.
Either bring back the old system where there is no collective effort to match #1 and #2 - and everyone argues who the real #1 is at the end of the year - but some years by magical coincidence #1 and #2 wind up in the same bowl and its awesome.
Or give us a playoff. One of reasonable size. Not too big. Like 8 teams.
The BCS is a bastard child of a playoff and the old "every bowl for itself" tradition - and its ugly as hell.
Either bring back the old system where there is no collective effort to match #1 and #2 - and everyone argues who the real #1 is at the end of the year - but some years by magical coincidence #1 and #2 wind up in the same bowl and its awesome.
Or give us a playoff. One of reasonable size. Not too big. Like 8 teams.
The BCS is a bastard child of a playoff and the old "every bowl for itself" tradition - and its ugly as hell.
re: One problem with a playoff
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/7/09 at 11:35 am to PentagonTiger
The solution is simple. Extend the season earlier by one week in August. That gets one week.
The NC is pretty much a week after the BCS games so there's already a 2 week playoff that can be built on that schedule.
Hold the first round of the 8 team playoff on the first Saturday in December. Losers go to bowls and the 4 winners have a month to prepare for a 2 week 4 team playoff.
There you go.
The NC is pretty much a week after the BCS games so there's already a 2 week playoff that can be built on that schedule.
Hold the first round of the 8 team playoff on the first Saturday in December. Losers go to bowls and the 4 winners have a month to prepare for a 2 week 4 team playoff.
There you go.
re: Great Playoff Proposal
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/7/09 at 11:31 am to medtiger
quote:
but the NCAA tourney is the most popular sporting event in this country
And the NCAA basketball regular season is one of the most unpopular sporting events int the country.
re: Great Playoff Proposal
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/7/09 at 11:22 am to Gmorgan4982
quote:
Boise could get a home-and-home with USC whenever they wanted!
I was talking about how they couldn't schedule quality opponents - not shitty has beens.
re: Great Playoff Proposal
Posted by MisterLuce on 12/7/09 at 11:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
march madness syndrome
65 teams out of a field of 347
vs
8 out of 120
That's 18% getting in vs. 6.7%.
Big difference IMO.
Popular
3










