- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Final Spinoff: CFB "How the Hell Are They That Good?" Thread
Posted on 4/10/15 at 4:49 pm to lsutigers1992
Posted on 4/10/15 at 4:49 pm to lsutigers1992
Missouri played in the East.
Last year, their only games against ranked opponents (at the time) were against:
South Carolina (Win 1 point, 21-20)
Georgia (Lost 34-0)
Texas A&M (Win by a touchdown, 34-27)
and then their SEC Championship game against Alabama, they lost 42-13.
Those ranked teams that they beat (South Carolina and Texas A&M) were not ranked at all by the end of the season. They were very overrated when Missouri played them.
So really, the only good teams they played last year were Georgia and Alabama, and they got stomped by both.
Last year, their only games against ranked opponents (at the time) were against:
South Carolina (Win 1 point, 21-20)
Georgia (Lost 34-0)
Texas A&M (Win by a touchdown, 34-27)
and then their SEC Championship game against Alabama, they lost 42-13.
Those ranked teams that they beat (South Carolina and Texas A&M) were not ranked at all by the end of the season. They were very overrated when Missouri played them.
So really, the only good teams they played last year were Georgia and Alabama, and they got stomped by both.
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 4/10/15 at 4:59 pm to EastNastySwag
Baylor wasn't a doormat of the SWC fool. Big XII yes
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:00 pm to PrimeTime Money
I hate to take up for Missou, but just because a team isn't ranked doesn't mean they aren't good. Beating USC and AM on the road are big wins for a program like them. Like good teams do, they took care of business against the teams they should have.
11-3 in a major conference is a great year no matter how you spin it.
11-3 in a major conference is a great year no matter how you spin it.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:03 pm to Sevendust912
They're only 1-10 against SEC teams with a winning conference record since joining.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:06 pm to lsutigers1992
duke under cutcliffe
uconn under edsall
ku under mangino
uk under rich brooks
uconn under edsall
ku under mangino
uk under rich brooks
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:08 pm to Korin
well they won 23 games in the last 2 seasons, I'd say they're doing just fine
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:12 pm to Sevendust912
They still need to actually win something.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:18 pm to Korin
They beat the teams they're supposed to beat and they lose to the ones they're supposed to lose to. They've been in the SEC three years and have been to the SECCG from the East more times than South Carolina. They're doing something right.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:19 pm to Korin
quote:
They still need to actually win something.
Oh stop it with the punditry.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:20 pm to Korin
quote:
They still need to actually win something.
To prove that they are a good team? I disagree.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:21 pm to lsutigers1992
the sec east is a joke, bruh.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:23 pm to TH03
They've held their own against the west also. 4-2 last 2 years, undefeated against them in the regular season.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:27 pm to Sevendust912
aTm, arky, and ole miss
POWERHOUSES

POWERHOUSES
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:43 pm to lsutigers1992
quote:
They beat the teams they're supposed to beat and they lose to the ones they're supposed to lose to. They've been in the SEC three years and have been to the SECCG from the East more times than South Carolina. They're doing something right.
Well Muschamp has as many East titles as USCe.

Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:46 pm to Sevendust912
quote:
To prove that they are a good team? I disagree.
Why not? Teams like Baylor/Boise State/Kansas State have all won conference titles or major bowls (or both) since Pinkel's been at the Zou.
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:46 pm to TH03
Ole Miss and AtM (the first time) were both ranked when Missouri beat them.
I don't know why I'm even taking up for Missouri cuz I don't like them, but winning 23 games in 2 years in the SEC is impressive no matter how you spin it.
I don't know why I'm even taking up for Missouri cuz I don't like them, but winning 23 games in 2 years in the SEC is impressive no matter how you spin it.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:47 pm to Korin
quote:
Why not? Teams like Baylor/Boise State/Kansas State have all won conference titles or major bowls (or both) since Pinkel's been at the Zou.
what does that have to do with Missouri?
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:47 pm to Sevendust912
They lost to shitty Indiana at home.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:48 pm to Sevendust912
literally nothing to show for it other than a couple runner up trophies.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 5:48 pm to Sevendust912
quote:
what does that have to do with Missouri?
That they have no excuse (s) for not winning at least something under Pinkel.
Popular
Back to top
