- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Federer vs. Nadal
Posted on 11/28/10 at 11:53 am
Posted on 11/28/10 at 11:53 am
ESPN 2 now
Fed up 1 set to nil
Fed up 1 set to nil
This post was edited on 11/28/10 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 11/28/10 at 12:54 pm to rollthatback
Nadal just won the second set. 1-1 now
Posted on 11/28/10 at 1:15 pm to Bread Orgeron
good match. Fed leads the 3rd set 3-1
Posted on 11/28/10 at 1:27 pm to eddieray
Federer cruised through the 3rd set 6-1 and now leads the head to head 6-4 on surfaces other than clay.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 1:30 pm to TulaneTigerFan
Had Nadal won today would most people have given up the other srufaces argument in favor of Fed?
Posted on 11/28/10 at 1:32 pm to TotesMcGotes
I doubt it. The past his prime excuse probably would have come out
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:04 pm to TotesMcGotes
3 set matches dont mean shite
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:56 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
I doubt it. The past his prime excuse probably would have come out
Did anyone catch the segment, during the 2nd set I believe, where the conversation of GOAT sort of developed? Don't remember who the commentator was, but it was with respect to Fed and Sampras - that when the two met, Sampras was past his prime but that Fed had not yet reached his. The discussion was, in effect, that when that happens, you actually do get a fair measure of who's "better." (Understanding that it's only the best-guess scenario). The logic was that where two players are equally away from their prime, because both are old - both are young - or one is old and the other young, that it can be a good indicator of the inherent talent, rather than athleticism, endurance, etc... that will typically go to the young.
@ 3 years ago, IMO, Fed started to lose his strangle-hold, when Nadal was about to hit his stride. But, about 3 years ago, Fed was by far the more dominant player. That said, Fed pulled out an amazing tourney this past week at the year end Championship, beating Nadal to do it. He may have lost a step or two, but my God - GOAT? AbsoF'Nlutely.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:04 pm to PokerLawyer
quote:
That said, Fed pulled out an amazing tourney this past week at the year end Championship, beating Nadal to do it.
It was a really impressive tourney for Federer. He beat Murray, Soderling, Djokovic, and Nadal all in succession while only losing one set in the final. Hopefully he can carry that positive momentum into next year. I thought that Annacone really helped him here, as he seemed to attack Nadal in ways that he hasn't in the past.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 1:05 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News