- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Calvin Pace: We had to put Reggie Bush out
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:39 pm to Sanchito
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:39 pm to Sanchito
One of the videos was an on-field fight with the word bounty attached to the title. Weak evidence.
The Vikings game video was mostly legal hits and others were physical playoff hits. One or two were questionable, but not enough to be proof of some bounty system. We've already explained why the Williams affidavit was weak and someone else disputed your Coaches Association point.
The Vikings game video was mostly legal hits and others were physical playoff hits. One or two were questionable, but not enough to be proof of some bounty system. We've already explained why the Williams affidavit was weak and someone else disputed your Coaches Association point.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:48 pm to tehchampion140
Dude I stated in the response that they were subjective. Black/White: Some hits looked as if they had the intent to injure, others did not. Did any compare to the hit on Bush? Were those the blatant ones? Everything of mine was weak but I am presented with the fact that they hurt the 2nd least amount of players. Now that's hard evidence! It couldn't be they failed to execute their plan. I never once excused Pace for his comments. I simply stated I wanted to see the transcript. I never once stated you guys were wrong or that I'm right. Just offering an opposing opinion that you guys refuse to acknowledge not accept.
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:50 pm to Sanchito
quote:
I am presented with the fact that they hurt the 2nd least amount of players.
So who was first?
Have they been investigated?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:54 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:Has it been brought to the NFL's attention that there was a bounty system in place is the question. The Saints were not punished for injuring people but for their intent to do so. Neglecting the message to stop and covering it up made it worse. Individual players are punished for hitting defenseless players and things of that nature. Organizations are punished for condoning it.
Have they been investigated?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:54 pm to TigerBait2008
this is the same guy who believed the Hargrove declaration proved the allegations
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:02 pm to TigerBait1127
Forgot to mention that as well. Were you wrong earlier bro?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:35 pm to Sanchito
Sanchito...shut the frick up bro
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:41 pm to SuperSoakher
Okay, with your addition to the debate, I have been converted.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:44 pm to TigerBait1127
That the Saints were not the winningest team since 2006 as was stated in the thread about Brees?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:50 pm to Sanchito
iinever said we were. iiknow that the patriots are
edit: iisee where you are coming from. iiwasn't as much addressing that one post as iiwas addressing the whole thread. he was copying and pasting various shite from the web ago he was doing research.
were you wrong about the Hargrove declaration that the nfl mischaracterized?
edit: iisee where you are coming from. iiwasn't as much addressing that one post as iiwas addressing the whole thread. he was copying and pasting various shite from the web ago he was doing research.
were you wrong about the Hargrove declaration that the nfl mischaracterized?
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:58 pm to TigerBait1127
I realize now what you were talking about and it was the same situation as this one. I was referencing another thread you tried to discredit me in and the person you quoted was wrong. It was during the same time we were arguing here.
ETA: I feel it is more credible now with the Williams affidavit.
ETA: I feel it is more credible now with the Williams affidavit.
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 7:06 pm
Popular
Back to top

1





