Started By
Message

re: Calvin Pace: We had to put Reggie Bush out

Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18892 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:39 pm to
One of the videos was an on-field fight with the word bounty attached to the title. Weak evidence.
The Vikings game video was mostly legal hits and others were physical playoff hits. One or two were questionable, but not enough to be proof of some bounty system. We've already explained why the Williams affidavit was weak and someone else disputed your Coaches Association point.
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:48 pm to
Dude I stated in the response that they were subjective. Black/White: Some hits looked as if they had the intent to injure, others did not. Did any compare to the hit on Bush? Were those the blatant ones? Everything of mine was weak but I am presented with the fact that they hurt the 2nd least amount of players. Now that's hard evidence! It couldn't be they failed to execute their plan. I never once excused Pace for his comments. I simply stated I wanted to see the transcript. I never once stated you guys were wrong or that I'm right. Just offering an opposing opinion that you guys refuse to acknowledge not accept.
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 5:50 pm
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40491 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

I am presented with the fact that they hurt the 2nd least amount of players.


So who was first?



Have they been investigated?
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Have they been investigated?
Has it been brought to the NFL's attention that there was a bounty system in place is the question. The Saints were not punished for injuring people but for their intent to do so. Neglecting the message to stop and covering it up made it worse. Individual players are punished for hitting defenseless players and things of that nature. Organizations are punished for condoning it.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 5:54 pm to
this is the same guy who believed the Hargrove declaration proved the allegations
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:02 pm to
Forgot to mention that as well. Were you wrong earlier bro?
Posted by SuperSoakher
Member since Jun 2012
4585 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:35 pm to
Sanchito...shut the frick up bro
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:41 pm to
Okay, with your addition to the debate, I have been converted.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:41 pm to
What was iiwrong about?
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:44 pm to
That the Saints were not the winningest team since 2006 as was stated in the thread about Brees?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:50 pm to
iinever said we were. iiknow that the patriots are

edit: iisee where you are coming from. iiwasn't as much addressing that one post as iiwas addressing the whole thread. he was copying and pasting various shite from the web ago he was doing research.

were you wrong about the Hargrove declaration that the nfl mischaracterized?
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 6:55 pm
Posted by Sanchito
Member since Apr 2012
995 posts
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:58 pm to
I realize now what you were talking about and it was the same situation as this one. I was referencing another thread you tried to discredit me in and the person you quoted was wrong. It was during the same time we were arguing here.

ETA: I feel it is more credible now with the Williams affidavit.
This post was edited on 9/24/12 at 7:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram