re: 4 ways QB's use the strategic underthrow:

quote:

---

Keep posting your meaningless drivel. You face-planted on this thread, and every guy who understands the passing game gets to see what a phony you are. I hope you post your screen shots every day til September. 

Dude. You are badly out of your depth. and you don't even know it.

---

Dumbass liar couldnt stay on topic for 6 minutes and you claim other people are out of their depth?
Son you couldnt tell me where the 7 technique lines up without google.

You have no idea what qb talent looks like.
Your definition of good qb play is whatever stat line Joe Burrow put up.
You couldnt point out the jack lb if someone had a gun to your head.
You couldnt tell whether a rb should read his blocks inside out or outside in if Le'Veon Bell was whispering it in your ear.

You dont know shite about football.
Youre just some football ignorant yankee that wishes he could have JB nut in his cheerios every morning.



Do us all a favor and go run that dick sucker of yours somewhere else.

quote:

---

Sorry, clown boy, but the topic is "4 ways QB's use the strategic underthrow". You don't get to decide what is and what is not the topic.

---

I was talking about you needing me to mention the 9 route 6 minutes after i had already mentioned it. Did you already forget this post....?




You seriously suck at this message board shite.




How often do you think about having a bubble bath with Joe Burrow?

quote:

---

Well then, let's clarify. As I understand it, we are now in complete agreement that the "strategic underthrow" is "a thing" in the game of football. And, that it can be used on any route on the route-tree including the 9-route [unless the WR has the DB so badly beat that he doesn't need to use the technique to create separation] 

Right?

---

We are in agreement you dream of long walks by ocean with Joe Burrow.


But there isnt a planned underthrow on 8 or 9 routes when wr has beaten and is behind his man. Its a mistake. Which is what sammy and i have been saying since the beginning. Apparently you needed every statement on the subject to include the phrase ," 9 route".

quote:

---

we're in agreement on the underthrow thing. Great. Nice chattin with ya. 

---

Nope.

And you said qb prefer PI instead of tds.

Lets do another post.....
Where in your post does it say "you dont think qbs would rather a PI over a td"

quote:

---

Well then, let's clarify. As I understand it, we are now in complete agreement that the "strategic underthrow" is "a thing" in the game of football. And, that it can be used on any route on the route-tree including the 9-route [unless the WR has the DB so badly beat that he doesn't need to use the technique to create separation] 

---

You cant escape your own words.





Hopefully you see and understand what im doing but probably not.

quote:

---

No dufuss, I don't have to prove a negative. YOU made the silly claim. It is up to you to put up or shut up

---

So you dont get what im doing.

Youre hopeless.

I know you mentioned you didnt think a qb preferred a PI over a TD but why didnt you post it in every post like you insisted I do with the 9 route?



Why are you liking your own posts? Its pathetic.

quote:

---

Why are you liking your own posts? Its pathetic.

---

So, now you are claiming that you can magically read the little arrows and see who poked em? Really? Fascinating.

How does that work? Please tell us. Do the little arrows speak to you? What do they say to you? Please be specific. inquiring minds want to know.

quote:

---

you have to explain an attempted joke or an attempted analogy, then it flopped. Try harder next time.

---

Or youre to stupid to understand it.

I used your dumbass delivery word for word.

You really suck at this.

quote:

---

Then make the last few of your posts go to 2 likes.

---

Why. You are the all-knowing "arrow whisperer". You already know who poked every arrow on the whole damn site... right?

Or do you only know what arrows I push?

Or are you saying who have no damn clue who poked any arrow at all? (I want to believe the first option)