- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 absolutely amazing things from CFB today
Posted on 10/18/09 at 1:44 am to TigerintheNO
Posted on 10/18/09 at 1:44 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
The Chargers would disagree
Not gonna watch the video(too much lag time via my POS pc), but if it's too much of an advantage for an offense on 4th or in the last 2 minutes, it should be too much every other time of the game. Make up your fricking mind--should it be allowed or not? Be consistent.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 1:55 am to SlowFlowPro
I know that midget. He was my neighbor growing up in slidell. His dad, also a midget, was part of the staff in the 80s or was a ballboy or something. I remember seeing a picture in their house but he looked too old to be a ball boy.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 2:00 am to iheartlsu
quote:
I know that midget.
Was it Saban?
quote:
His dad, also a midget
midgetry is hereditary?
Posted on 10/18/09 at 2:02 am to Hot Carl
His wife was also a midget, but her sister and mom were both normal height.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 2:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i actually missed the "incomplete pass" comment b/c i was jumping up and down hollering at the tv
That was like 3 or 4 minutes after the actual play.
You must have been REALLY excited about that TD, lol.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 2:27 am to Hot Carl
quote:
shouldn't be any special fumble rule on 4th down or in the last 2 minutes.
I agree with the rule in the final 2 minutes, but it's a good rule on 4th down, IMO.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 2:51 am to shel311
Its to prevent intentional fumbles. If its 4th down and you are being tackled, there isn't much to lose by fumbling and hoping it bounces to one of your players. If the other team recovers, no biggie, its still there ball.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 3:06 am to C
quote:
Its to prevent intentional fumbles. If its 4th down and you are being tackled, there isn't much to lose by fumbling and hoping it bounces to one of your players. If the other team recovers, no biggie, its still there ball.
Exactly why it's a good rule on 4th down.
But I do agree with HotCarl that it's silly to have that rule only for the last 2 minutes.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 4:25 am to shel311
quote:
only for the last 2 minutes.
Why? Any other time the person who take a huge huge gamble by trying to fumble the ball forward. Usually there are more defensive than offensive players on that side of the ball. If its not 4th down, then you have a huge risk of giving up a lot of field position by turning over the ball. And of course there's always the risk of fumbling forward out of the end-zone.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
GD and VL were making frickin excuses all game long for UF!!
VL actually said "Is it ruled an Incomplete Pass" because he fumbled it,
HELLO, he recovered it moments later INSIDE the endzone!! Man get that fruit loop outta there!!
HATE THESE 2 DOUCHE BAGS!
VL actually said "Is it ruled an Incomplete Pass" because he fumbled it,
HELLO, he recovered it moments later INSIDE the endzone!! Man get that fruit loop outta there!!
HATE THESE 2 DOUCHE BAGS!
Posted on 10/18/09 at 8:37 am to DSports24
How can you say he fumbled INTENTIONALLY....Were you not watching the same game??
He was trying to stretch the ball over the line and the defender stripped him>>
He was trying to stretch the ball over the line and the defender stripped him>>
Posted on 10/18/09 at 9:33 am to wizziko
quote:
3. "is it an incomplete pass?" verne lundquist
this
jesus fricking christ
Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Actually, I think it was Danielson that said something along the lines of "would that negate the catch and cause an in-completion" when the Arky WR fumbled the ball before getting in the endzone.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:12 am to Tigerbait337
Man I was screaming at the TV to get those two losers off the set!!
I think they were just praying it wouldn't count for Arky!
I think they were just praying it wouldn't count for Arky!
Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:17 am to wizziko
quote:
3. "is it an incomplete pass?" verne lundquist
I still can't get over that
Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
1. gary danielson on the arky fumble in the endzone that they recovered in the end zone. "whose ball is it?"
why was this play even reviewed?
the ball either crossed the goal line before the fumble or the recovered and scored a TD. Verne and Gary trying to make a big deal out of it was laughable.
Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Wouldn't that be an Incomplete pass

Posted on 10/18/09 at 10:28 am to SlowFlowPro
OUT OF BOUNDS?? How was it out of bounds?
The ball and his knees were in bounds
The ball and his knees were in bounds
Popular
Back to top


0




