Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

People Watch Us Becuase.... LULZ

Posted on 10/28/14 at 4:06 pm
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 10/28/14 at 4:06 pm
And they're both right. And they're both wrong. In my opinion, they're also both idiots.

LINK #.

Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 10/28/14 at 4:07 pm to
Or are they? Because they probably get paid more than most of us.

I just found it funny.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5593 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 9:21 am to
Yea I saw that yesterday, pretty funny. As much as I like Schiff, he's been riding off this for about six years.

Since then, off the top of my head he's predicted about 6 different crashes. Doomsdayer's only have to be right once ever decade to be considered oracles. Schiff has been a strategist for a while now (and tried to be a politician in '10), so it's much different making claims from the "economist" ivory tower compared to actually having to manage money. If his themes were manifested in portfolios he actually ran he'd have some pretty pissed off clients looking at their 5-year performance right now.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 9:22 am
Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
9184 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 2:05 pm to
The most perplexing thing about Schiff was that he had and kept his clients loaded up in international stocks fully believing collapse was imminent, even during the entire market collapse. His take on the US, while believing weaker countries would fare amazingly better, was ludicrous at the time he was making assertions of doom. Why would anyone invest with that guy? It is still amazing to see some people make good livings off others when the self-professed knowledgeable prognosticators can be dangerously unknowledgeable and completely wrong.
Posted by Ole War Skule
North Shore
Member since Sep 2003
3409 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:37 am to
yeah, CNBC panders pretty often to hype type talking heads.

They regularly put 'doom n gloom' Marc Faber who is ALWAYS predicting disaster. Their latest efforts to generate interest without substance are putting 'sharks' on to analyze market or economic conditions as if Cuban and O'Leary are any kind of expert on those subjects.

only
Posted by Ole War Skule
North Shore
Member since Sep 2003
3409 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:38 am to
yeah, CNBC panders pretty often to hype type talking heads.

They regularly feature 'doom n gloom' Marc Faber who is ALWAYS predicting disaster. Their latest efforts to generate interest without substance are putting 'sharks' on to analyze market or economic conditions as if Cuban and O'Leary are any kind of expert on those subjects.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram