- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/2/26 at 12:58 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
Up to your risk tolerance!
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:47 pm to michael corleone
Last week there was someone on X saying there were a bunch of puts purchased on this week's 07/02 205 puts. The problem is what they paid for them on 06/25 or 6/26 is much higher than what you can sell them for them now.
I think they paid in the $4 and $5s for them and today when NBIS had the big move down around 10 central you could've gotten $2 or $2.08 tops and the rest was mostly $1.20 and now only 30¢ for them with 80 minutes to go for the week. After the put purchase last week the stock traded sideways then sharply higher at the beginning of this week.
Those put buyers did not get the fast aggressive move needed to make money on them.
There was also talk about the July 17 $155 puts purchased and those are trading less than what they paid for those. Even with the big move down the last two days, they are far out of the money.
I see you guys talking about NBIL, but why do you favor that over NBIG which is 2x as well. They have similar bid ask spreads, and they are both liquid with NBIL always having more volume though. NBIG has an expense ratio of 0.76% vs NBIL's 1.5%
I think they paid in the $4 and $5s for them and today when NBIS had the big move down around 10 central you could've gotten $2 or $2.08 tops and the rest was mostly $1.20 and now only 30¢ for them with 80 minutes to go for the week. After the put purchase last week the stock traded sideways then sharply higher at the beginning of this week.
Those put buyers did not get the fast aggressive move needed to make money on them.
There was also talk about the July 17 $155 puts purchased and those are trading less than what they paid for those. Even with the big move down the last two days, they are far out of the money.
I see you guys talking about NBIL, but why do you favor that over NBIG which is 2x as well. They have similar bid ask spreads, and they are both liquid with NBIL always having more volume though. NBIG has an expense ratio of 0.76% vs NBIL's 1.5%
Posted on 7/2/26 at 2:01 pm to waverly911
quote:
I see you guys talking about NBIL, but why do you favor that over NBIG which is 2x as well. They have similar bid ask spreads, and they are both liquid with NBIL always having more volume though. NBIG has an expense ratio of 0.76% vs NBIL's 1.5%
Excellent question. Had to AI this...
Key Takeaways for Traders
Fee Efficiency: NBIG cuts the annual expense ratio exactly in half compared to NBIL (0.75% vs 1.50%). If you plan on holding a position for more than a few days, NBIG will apply significantly less fee drag to your capital.
Execution Premium: NBIL was the earlier entry to the market. It often commands higher daily trading volume and a narrower bid/ask spread. This can make NBIL slightly more efficient for high-frequency day trading, where entry and exit execution speeds matter more than underlying management fees.
Because both rebalance daily, the choice depends on whether you value lower management fees or tighter execution spreads.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 3:00 pm to TigerDoug
Well baws, the Tuscan villa is on hold but I’ll settle for Lake Lanier on this 4th of July weekend 
Posted on 7/2/26 at 3:01 pm to jefforize
What a save!!
50 day SMA still in tact, and that’s something to be excited about.
50 day SMA still in tact, and that’s something to be excited about.
Page 441 of 441
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News