- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Holding AMC Thread- Diamond hands unite
Posted on 1/26/22 at 10:07 am to Chucktown_Badger
Posted on 1/26/22 at 10:07 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
If it was my investment, I'd appreciate that pressure testing.
Touche. I agree that you should look at all sides. That's why I liked some of AT's picks and not others. That's why I sold and took my profits when I saw the writing on the wall. Like I said, I still have ZOM, because I still see it going back up in time. Same for AMC. There's not much more to say, other than AMC would have to go bankrupt for me to only break even. I don't see that happening. Opinions vary.
0
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:25 am to Chucktown_Badger
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:41 pm to Buck_Rogers
Just read the whole thing. How specifically will that send AMCs share price skyrocketing, assuming it passes? The sense I get is that it just requires more reporting.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:57 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
How specifically will that send AMCs share price skyrocketing, assuming it passes?
Where did I say this would send it skyrocketing. I just said it could be another piece to the puzzle; as in more transparency; as in that is why I said I was holding. If you're not for more transparency, then that explains why you're obsessed with this without owning any shares.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:01 pm to Buck_Rogers
quote:
Where did I say this would send it skyrocketing. I just said it could be another piece to the puzzle; as in more transparency; as in that is why I said I was holding. If you're not for more transparency, then that explains why you're obsessed with this without owning any shares.
So you don't anticipate these new measures, if they pass, to have a material impact on AMC and the share price, but the potential for those measure to pass is why you're holding?
That makes no sense.
And it doesn't provide any transparency to the broader market, just more transparency to the govt. Your own link said as much.
quote:
The commission plans to propose on Wednesday that big funds submit confidential forms to the SEC within one business day when there are significant changes to their prime-brokerage relationships, available cash or counter-party defaults.
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:14 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Another (which by definition means ONE MORE) piece of the puzzle (which generally has MULTIPLE pieces). You've begun to bore me. Go back to work.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:27 pm to Buck_Rogers
To recap how this goes:
Us: So why are you holding?
You: Gives reason that makes no sense and/or which will have no bearing on AMC stock price
Us: That makes no sense
You: Why do you even care?
Us: So why are you holding?
You: Gives reason that makes no sense and/or which will have no bearing on AMC stock price
Us: That makes no sense
You: Why do you even care?
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:58 pm to Chucktown_Badger
You obviously have selective memory and reading skills, so whatever you say, pal.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 1:01 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
This thing has been declining steadily for the better part of 3 months...so not only are hedge funds shorting it making out like gangbusters, they can cover their positions at any point they want to.
You've been quiet about this lately. Just checking to see if you have the same sentiment after all of the news, such as the new SEC regulations that you thought might not pass; the ongoing DOJ probes; How AMC was able to lower their debt? Do you still think none of this is happening or just ignoring it and wishing you didn't sell ZOM at a loss? Stay thirsty my friend...
This post was edited on 2/17/22 at 1:04 am
Posted on 2/18/22 at 10:24 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Things are getting more and more interesting. Yet another piece to the puzzle, or does it still not make sense?
U.S. prosecutors explore racketeering charges in short-seller probe
ETA: Remember that up or down votes do nothing to change the facts.
U.S. prosecutors explore racketeering charges in short-seller probe
ETA: Remember that up or down votes do nothing to change the facts.
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 2/22/22 at 11:44 am to Buck_Rogers
Didn't see AMC mentioned in that story.
AMC was never sold short at levels coming anywhere close to GME, and the run up was hardly a short squeeze...it was you buying from each other.
Short interest has been in an "underwhelming" range of ~14%-21% for almost the last year. Couple that low SI% with AMC's willingness to continue to issue new shares and I laugh at anyone who thinks a squeeze is ever gonna happen.
Regardless, talk me through how the DOJ finding something that breaks the law and punishing those people will send AMC to the moon. I'm genuinely curious.
AMC was never sold short at levels coming anywhere close to GME, and the run up was hardly a short squeeze...it was you buying from each other.
Short interest has been in an "underwhelming" range of ~14%-21% for almost the last year. Couple that low SI% with AMC's willingness to continue to issue new shares and I laugh at anyone who thinks a squeeze is ever gonna happen.
Regardless, talk me through how the DOJ finding something that breaks the law and punishing those people will send AMC to the moon. I'm genuinely curious.
This post was edited on 2/22/22 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 2/22/22 at 12:31 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
you morons
If you want to resort to name calling then go PHUCK yourself. I stopped reading at that point, because it shows your character.
This post was edited on 2/22/22 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 2/22/22 at 12:53 pm to Buck_Rogers
So sorry to offend. I removed the offending word, and will stick with things like "I pity you" and telling you you have no balls...as you've done recently in this thread.
So find your marbles and jump back in.
ETA: It's ok to say frick on this board.
So find your marbles and jump back in.
ETA: It's ok to say frick on this board.
This post was edited on 2/22/22 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 2/22/22 at 1:57 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Didn't see AMC mentioned in that story.
Because the DOJ is not investigating AMC on RICO charges. You should read about past instances where RICO was used. This is only the beginning if the DOJ does move forward. We'll see.
quote:
AMC was never sold short at levels coming anywhere close to GME
Some believe it is shorted more than GME. GME caught them by surprise. I originally got in this when the hedge funds thought it was a sure thing that there would be massive share dilution still to come. When news broke that AMC would not be issuing anymore shares, the hedge funds realized they were screwed. They saw it coming and tried to avoid a GME scenario again. The fact is that they have not covered. More and more synthetic shares were created to drive down the price.
quote:
Short interest has been in an "underwhelming" range of ~14%-21% for almost the last year
Not true. Again, this is why the SEC is changing rules on more transparency and quicker reporting. The SEC has admitted that 95% of retail trades do not go through the LIT exchange, so have no effect on the price the day they're traded.
quote:
AMC's willingness to continue to issue new shares
This is where it gets good, in case you missed:
These bonds are NOT redeemable for shares.
quote:
Regardless, talk me through how the DOJ finding something that breaks the law and punishing those people will send AMC to the moon.
I'll say it one more time. It's one more piece to the puzzle. It's just more proof that there is probably a lot of illegal activity going on, and it's NOT on the side of retail investors who want the price to go up. Did you not catch the recent warehouse fire in Bartlett and see videos of excavators removing documents while they were still on fire? I'm pretty sure the normal protocol is to put the fire out first.
The question is, do you think the price would be higher if everything mentioned here did not take place?
ETA: Bartlett Fire
This post was edited on 2/22/22 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 2/22/22 at 2:02 pm to Buck_Rogers
Yikes
Posted on 2/22/22 at 2:16 pm to WDE24
Too much ridiculousness there to even try to unpack it. I'll just laugh and say "this shite again?" and "we'll see."
Posted on 2/22/22 at 2:26 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
To recap how this goes:
Us: So why are you holding?
You: Gives reason that makes no sense and/or which will have no bearing on AMC stock price
Us: That makes no sense
You: Why do you even care?
Chinese Badger: I'm sorry. Can you explain?
Me: Proceeds to explain with links to back up.
Chinese Badger: Too much ridiculousness there to even try to unpack it...
Me: Way to do your research on both sides and not be lazy before commenting.
ETA: Looks like you dropped your marbles... Again.
This post was edited on 2/22/22 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 2/22/22 at 2:44 pm to Buck_Rogers
quote:You haven’t explained anything related to the value of AMC other than you’ve been duped by conspiracy theories and think there are puzzle pieces that are going to fit together that send AMC to the moon.
Me: Proceeds to explain with links to back up.
Posted on 2/22/22 at 2:50 pm to WDE24
Anyone else remember when the "Super Official AMC Share Count" was going to expose the millions or billions of synthetic shares?
I do.
I do.
Posted on 2/22/22 at 2:51 pm to WDE24
If you reply this fast, then you've yet to read everything I brought attention to in my posts. I'm not going to spoon feed it to y'all like babies. If you don't want to do more research on it, then that's your choice. I really don't care.
Page 274 of 276
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News