Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Committee for a responsible federal budget praises tariffs…for raising revenue

Posted on 8/12/25 at 7:59 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74174 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 7:59 pm
quote:

Raise your hand if you expected President Trump’s sweeping new tariff regime to get a relatively positive assessment from . . . the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

The CRFB is one of those lonely voices in Washington reminding American policymakers and the public that the country can’t just borrow and spend forever, a message of responsibility and long-term thinking that almost everyone in the nation’s capital hates and largely ignores.

A new analysis by CRFB gives the Trump administration’s tariff regime credit where it’s due — it’s bringing in a ton of money, which should make the annual deficit numbers better this year and in future years

The group adds, “expect tariff revenue to grow further and ultimately rise to $40 to $50 billion per month (over 1.5 percent of GDP), before declining some as supply chains adjust.”

The think-tank emphasizes, “Our estimates are very rough and intended to reflect the general magnitude of the policies rather than precise scores, given the complexity of the tariffs and their impacts.” As you may have noticed, the tariff rates have changed quickly during Trump’s half-year or so in office.

The U.S. government is raking in a lot more revenue than it was projected to before Trump’s far-reaching tariff regime started. CRFB continues:

To put the tariffs in context, they are larger than what would be collected from a new 1 percent payroll tax, a $25 carbon tax, an elimination of Medicare Advantage overpayments, or a 17 percent reduction in military personnel. They are somewhat smaller than what would be collected from a 5 percent broad Value-Added Tax (VAT) or reversing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).”





LINK

Link to report

Their bottom line:


quote:


Although there are many legitimate concerns over the tariffs – including their impact on the economy and the level of uncertainty they are creating – policymakers should not repeal them without an adequate replacement for the revenue loss. Nor should they divert the revenue away from deficit reduction and toward new spending, tax cuts, or rebates.

If policymakers want to remove the tariffs going forward, they should put forward alternative revenue sources or spending cuts to avoid worsening an already unsustainable fiscal outlook.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 8:14 pm
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52535 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 8:02 pm to
The real question is do we use this new tax revenue to get closer to a balanced budget.

So far the administration does not seem too interested in it
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 8:03 pm
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6978 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

The real question is do we use this new tax revenue to get closer to a balanced budget.



Should


quote:

So far the administration does not seem too interested in it


Then they need to change it
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
69181 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

They are somewhat smaller than what would be collected from a 5 percent broad Value-Added Tax (VAT) or reversing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).”


Tsk tsk
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram