Started By
Message

re: 1st 90 Days Retired - portfolio allocation question

Posted on 4/18/26 at 4:43 am to
Posted by 3D
NJ
Member since Sep 2013
1365 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 4:43 am to
Coach me up..... Do Nepo-Babies hate Boomers too, or no ???
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3110 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

But given the combo of our current $30 million Estate Tax exemption, and step-up in basis, the wealth transfer would have to be pushing $40M to even warrant the calculation, wouldn't it?

Stepped up basis doesn't help heirs with tax deferred retirement assets. Those still get taxed as income (entire balance not just growth) and dont get stepped up basis. Those accounts have to be distributed and taxed entirely within 10 yrs for most heirs ( unless "eligible designated beneficiaries" (spouses, minors, disabled/ill, or <10 years younger) That could be a huge tax burden for a working adult in their peak earning years already in a higher bracket.
I dont want to leave a multi million $ traditional IRA balance to my kids just to see it potentially taxed at 32%+ when I could have converted at 22-24%.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13707 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Boomer means that you’re over 40
Not even close. May wanna get off of tik tok and do some research.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I thought tax deferred wealth transfer triggered 10-year installment.
For an IRA? Yes that's right.

I was addressing general holdings, i.e., property, and other portfolios. The bulk of American inheritance (~70-80%) is passed through real estate and taxable investments that enjoy more favorable wealth transfer tax treatment.
This post was edited on 4/18/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 4/18/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I dont want to leave a multi million $ traditional IRA balance to my kids just to see it potentially taxed at 32%+ when I could have converted at 22-24%.
Ah, Fair enough. If there is a reverse tax bracket differential as you describe, that makes sense.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram