Does the committee start ranking the 25th team first or #1 first? Kind of hard to truly compare resumes of ranked teams before all of those teams are ranked.

Or, does the committee rank those teams after 1 and 2 ranking to help justify their position?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by 00 Tech Grad

My homestead, AL

Member since Nov 2009

11285 posts

Posted on 12/4/19 at 12:49 pm to TchPowDog

quote:
Jesus Christ, dude. The CFP thinks OSU is slightly better than LSU - and they're justified in thinking that. OSU has shown more consistency throughout the season. And they've destroyed everyone.

Will you still be saying this after LSU beats UGA and the committee uses the fraudulent rankings they’ve intentionally manipulated to keep OSU At #1 even after LSU beats UGA (who is undebatably far superior to Wisconsin) and OSU predictably beats Wiscy again?

I wouldn’t be surprised if they drop UGA to 11th just ahead of Auburn and Alabama.

This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 12:53 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by nola000

Lacombe, LA

Member since Dec 2014

13139 posts

Posted on 12/4/19 at 2:05 pm to Father Time

quote:
Does the committee start ranking the 25th team first or #1 first? Kind of hard to truly compare resumes of ranked teams before all of those teams are ranked.

Or, does the committee rank those teams after 1 and 2 ranking to help justify their position?

Good question.

Not sure.

Again, all the more reason to go with the original, or better, BCS DISPASSIONATE, UNBIASED, FAIR, NON-AGENDA DRIVEN, UNEMOTIONAL, BLIND metrics-driven formula.

InB4, bUT MuH ComPOOteRs ArE oNly As GuUd aS PRoGrAMMmeR!!!

THIS is where you can have a very large, comprehensive, expert panel made up of statisticians and former players and coaches from various eras to debate as long as necessary to reach some semblance of a consensus on weighing the different metrics to apply to the algorithm. You can even retroactively run the formula against past matchups and compare the results to prove its worth in real-world scenarios.

But most importantly, once you nail it down, STEP THE frick AWAY FROM IT AND LEAVE ITS TO DO ITS frickING JOB!

But NOOOO!! They want to tweak on it here, tweak on it there. Grab a little power here, grab a little power there. "Computer says Utah vs. Clemson in NC! EHHHRRRMERGERDDD!! MUH EYE TEST! WE NEED A COMMITTEE!"

Like I said. They dont want accurate and fair matchups and competition. They want an entertainment product that generates revenue. The more the better.

Equity be damned.

This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 2:06 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hurricane Mike

Member since Jun 2008

20059 posts

Posted on 12/4/19 at 2:15 pm to nola000

Your first group of numbers have flawed logic in the calculations leaving out Texas' rank

Also, I don't give a shite about ranking when played.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by olexmao

Member since Aug 2019