Started By
Message

re: Would you rather have BK or Lincoln Riley?

Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:50 am to
Posted by Lcguy
Member since Jan 2020
1830 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:50 am to
Lincoln riley should have stayed at OU. He can't direct a program . Ou was already built.
Posted by tigerbait1970
H-Town
Member since Oct 2007
741 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:53 am to
We won the tallest midget sweepstakes!!

BK
LINCOLN
SUNBELT BILLY

ALL HIRED AT THE SAME TIME AND SADLY, BK IS THE BEST OF THE BUNCH.
Posted by Srobi14
South Florida
Member since Aug 2014
3988 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I would have preferred our AD to not have been lazy and political and only be interested in big name coaches.


I hear you but there is much more risk in that sort of decision. Look at all the programs that have hired lesser known guys, often times it doesn't work out. Hiring a proven guy raises the floor generally but also can potentially lower the ceiling. It's not an easy job finding a winner in college football.
Posted by mrbayoublu
Acadiana
Member since Jan 2004
2925 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:21 am to
My choice would be that our AD wouldn't hire a coach with a 10-year contract for $10 million per year.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78086 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:50 am to
Lincoln Riley would be killing it here.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram