- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who will admit O has exceeded expectations and is an upgrade from Les?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:24 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:24 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Everyone knew the 2013 offense would be better than it was in years.
If this board could stop this stupid Miles/Orgeron bashing long enough it might notice that the 2019 offense is going to be at least in the area of 2013.
If this board could stop this stupid Miles/Orgeron bashing long enough it might notice that the 2019 offense is going to be at least in the area of 2013.
1
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:24 pm to lsufball19
quote:
but that's not really a shocking number to see for a good college QB.
Except it is when youre 105th in plays ran.
I'm not shocked by the offense being productive but 3000 yard passer,2 1000 yard wrs ,and a 1000 yard rusher had never happened before in the sec so I'd say yes most people didnt think it was gonna be as productive as it was.
Prior to 2012 Juice claim to fame was destroying people in ST.
This post was edited on 5/1/19 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:25 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Everyone knew the 2013 offense would be better than it was in years.
Not denying that.
Denying that 2012 shouldve been just as productive after losing starting and backup qbs and most productive wr.
This post was edited on 5/1/19 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:27 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Prior to 2012 Juice claim to fame was destroying people in ST.
Landry was a fan favorite, a 5* that everyone* knew would blow up. Hispotential was incredible.
*Except you
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Denying that 2012 shouldve been just as productive after losing starting and backup qbs and most productive wr.
Well well well, you recognize that's a problem in 2012, but won't acknowledge that losing the starting QB, first and second team RB, top two WRs, and 4 out of 5 OL was a significant problem for 2018.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Expected total offensive numbers to be similar.
Expecting similar total offensive output means having 2 1000 yard wrs retard.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:32 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Expecting similar total offensive output means having 2 1000 yard wrs retard
You won't have two 1000 yard WRs because LSU is going to run more multiple WR sets. If you have 3000 yards passing, does it matter if two WRs get all the catches or if it's spread out?Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Landry was a fan favorite, a 5* that everyone* knew would blow up. Hispotential was incredible.
I was hoping you were retarded enough to mention that.
Name the amount of true sophomore wrs with 1000 yards Rodger in the sec.
Experience doesnt matter anymore when talking about miles coached teams.
True sophomores are expected to play like true juniors on miles coached teams.
You show your hypocrisy in every discussion.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:35 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Except it is when youre 105th in plays ran.
Well, in 2012, we were 70th in plays run. Not sure where you're getting 105th in 2013. I'm seeing 90th, not that it's all that important whether is 105th or 90th. Look I'm not saying no one was shocked, I'm just telling you I wasn't really all that shocked.
This post was edited on 5/1/19 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:35 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Well well well, you recognize that's a problem in 2012, but won't acknowledge that losing the starting QB, first and second team RB, top two WRs, and 4 out of 5 OL was a significant problem for 2018.
Roger just told us all that most people expected 2012's offense to be what 2013's was.
So, which is it?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:37 pm to RB10
Nice deflect to knight for your hero. Ask Roger to respond to his statements.
Ricky has bashed the 2018 offense relentlessly all season, but then suddenly understands returning offensive production when Miles didn't have it.
Ricky has bashed the 2018 offense relentlessly all season, but then suddenly understands returning offensive production when Miles didn't have it.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:37 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Name the amount of true sophomore wrs with 1000 yards
Link to where I said I expected 1000 from OBJ and Landry in 2012
Just another lie.
This post was edited on 5/1/19 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:38 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Well well well, you recognize that's a problem in 2012, but won't acknowledge that losing the starting QB, first and second team RB, top two WRs, and 4 out of 5 OL was a significant problem for 2018.
Please show me where I said 2018 didnt have issues?
The problem is the 2012 offense was bashed while you tout the 2018. I've never touted the 2012 offense.
Also, at one point the 2012 offense had lost 2 rbs and 3 olinemen.
Do you think those excuses were excepted or was it just labeled as underachieving?
The difference is I'm not touting that offense.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:39 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Nice deflect to knight for your hero. Ask Roger to respond to his statements.
I don't give a frick about Ricky. You've been gargling Roger's scrotum throughout this entire thread.
I want to know what you think about that statement. If it was reasonable to expect it in 2012 then it was certainly reasonable to expect it in 2018.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:39 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Please show me where I said 2018 didnt have issues?
OMG
You have spent how many months telling everyone that scheme was the problem and the offense could've been fixed with a scheme change.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:40 pm to The First Cut
quote:
You won't have two 1000 yard WRs because LSU is going to run more multiple WR sets. If you have 3000 yards passing, does it matter if two WRs get all the catches or if it's spread out?
Look if you're gonna respond to posts that arent directed at you at least understand the context.
Rodger expected similar offensive output from 2012 that we had in 2013.
Has frick all to do with the sets run today. We ran mostly 3wrs sets then.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:41 pm to The First Cut
quote:
OMG
You have spent how many months telling everyone that scheme was the problem and the offense could've been fixed with a scheme change.
I said the biggest issue was scheme. And O agreed with me which is why he hired Brady to come in and change the passing game.
Do you follow lsu?
Was Brady brought in because the scheme was fine?
This post was edited on 5/1/19 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:41 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Expecting similar total offensive output means having 2 1000 yard wrs retard.
Such an idiot.
LSU had 15 different people who caught passes in 2012. 5 played WR in the NFL, 4 played RB in the NFL
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:43 pm to RB10
quote:
I don't give a frick about Ricky. You've been gargling Roger's scrotum throughout this entire thread.
I don't defend anyone here, I post facts or logical arguments. The 2011 offense lost lots of production but most everyone expected Mett to be a vast improvement over JJ/Lee. Are you going to now deny that people didn't believe Mett to be an upgrade over that shite show?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 9:44 pm to RB10
quote:
I don't give a frick about Ricky
You're his mini me
It's so cute. You two even repeat each other's words verbatim.
Tpyall make such a cute couple.
Page 62 of 99
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News