- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/10/10 at 12:09 pm to Walt OReilly
'SC. They were blown out in several games this season. We at least we able to be competitive in all our games.
Posted on 1/10/10 at 12:20 pm to dreaux
quote:
who had a worse year. Lsu or Usc?
I would have to argue that when it's all said and done that USC will have had the worst year...Not only did they get blown out a couple of times and didn't win the PAC 10 for the first time in years. They will be loosing their beloved coach Pete, and will probably be place on probation before its over...
Posted on 1/10/10 at 12:30 pm to dreaux
USC's 2009 season is very close to a mirror image of LSU's 2008 season. Difference is, Carroll apparently saw the similarities and hauled butt.
Posted on 1/10/10 at 12:38 pm to dreaux
USC without a doubt. There season sucked and they are losing their coach so starting over again.
Posted on 1/10/10 at 12:51 pm to dreaux
I wouldn't trade places with USC. Even though I believe we under achieve under Miles, I would not want to swap that for a possible probation and sanctions. USC is always picked in the preseason to be at the top and fails to deliver by the end of the season.
Posted on 1/10/10 at 2:14 pm to dreaux
Actually we should have lost to Washington, Miss State, Georgia, did lose to Ole Miss, Florida,and Alabama. Should have been 6-6 and we are 8-8 in the SEC over the last 2 years. That is with top ten recruiting classes year after year after year. Every good thing promoted about Miles has come to an end. Everyone though he was not a good coach, and this year on national TV not once but twice proved it.
Posted on 1/10/10 at 2:44 pm to ps101
They both had very similar seasons, but anyway:
Push:
Record
In favor of USC:
Have a really high-quality win (@ Ohio State). LSU has none.
Won the bowl. LSU didn't.
In favor of LSU:
All losses were to ranked teams and in close fashion. USC lost two blowouts, and to three teams that didn't finish ranked (and one that didn't even make a bowl).
Had a better conference record in a better conference.
One common opponent: @ Washington. LSU won, USC lost.
LSU finished higher in the final polls.
Based on preseason expectations, LSU fared better than USC.
So IMO USC had the worse year, but both underachieved.
Push:
Record
In favor of USC:
Have a really high-quality win (@ Ohio State). LSU has none.
Won the bowl. LSU didn't.
In favor of LSU:
All losses were to ranked teams and in close fashion. USC lost two blowouts, and to three teams that didn't finish ranked (and one that didn't even make a bowl).
Had a better conference record in a better conference.
One common opponent: @ Washington. LSU won, USC lost.
LSU finished higher in the final polls.
Based on preseason expectations, LSU fared better than USC.
So IMO USC had the worse year, but both underachieved.
Posted on 1/13/10 at 5:55 pm to dreaux
quote:
who had a worse year. Lsu or Usc?
Definitely USC after the Keffin hire...
Posted on 1/13/10 at 5:59 pm to dreaux
USC. They not only lost their coach, they gained Kiffin!!
Posted on 1/13/10 at 6:21 pm to dreaux
USC- So much for all their 5* players.
Popular
Back to top
