- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Where is the most bang for the buck?
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:12 pm
Which choice below would make the biggest difference in securing a positive outlook for LSU this season if that was the only thing that could be changed.
Choose only 1
1. new head coach
2. new offensive coordinator
3. new quaterback
4. new offensive lineman
my choice would be #3
Choose only 1
1. new head coach
2. new offensive coordinator
3. new quaterback
4. new offensive lineman
my choice would be #3
This post was edited on 9/14/10 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:12 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
3. new quaterback
but i also like this option:
5- new fans.
This post was edited on 9/14/10 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:14 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
3. new quaterback
although Crowton is close second.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:14 pm to Bleeding purple
In the interest of ROI -
#2, which would alleviate the need for any of the other 3. Like a 4 for 1 sale at a fireworks stand.
#2, which would alleviate the need for any of the other 3. Like a 4 for 1 sale at a fireworks stand.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:20 pm to ccomeaux
I also vote #5 new fans. Easily the worst fans in the nation.
What coach in his right mind would want this job?
Perfect scenario in Baton Rouge -
undefeated, un-scored upon, national champion, fire the coach at the end of the year.
What coach in his right mind would want this job?
Perfect scenario in Baton Rouge -
undefeated, un-scored upon, national champion, fire the coach at the end of the year.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:21 pm to ccomeaux
#2. Hands down not even close
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:24 pm to 3XTiger
Do those chosing #2 believe that a new OC would (a) be able to tap hidden potential in our current QB's or
(b) that a new OC would simply gameplan around the current QB's.
If (b) how so?
(b) that a new OC would simply gameplan around the current QB's.
If (b) how so?
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:30 pm to Broham
correct answer is 3.
just think what this team would be like with a perdue-era drew brees under center.
just think what this team would be like with a perdue-era drew brees under center.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:32 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
Do those chosing #2 believe that a new OC would (a) be able to tap hidden potential in our current QB's or
(b) that a new OC would simply gameplan around the current QB's.
a = b. Every OC should gameplan to the stregnths or away from the weaknesses of the team/QB.
quote:
If (b) how so?
I don't know how you plan around your QB throwing one-hoppers to WRs other than changing QBs. JJ seems to throw best on the run, I would start there. He also seems to be most accurate in the 10-15 yd range, step 2.
JJ has trouble throwing quick routes with no drop like screens or RBs in the flats out of the shotgun.
So, I make him play from under center on short throws to help get his feet moving. I use square ins in the 10-15 yd range and I use comebacks/hooks with him rolling to the WR.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:32 pm to musick
quote:
correct answer is 3.
I agree as long as it is an improvement... remember change can be bad

Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:09 pm to Bleeding purple
The QB is everything, with RP last year we could have won the BCS Championship. Miles and his OC MUST learn to recruit good QBs.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:12 pm to Bleeding purple
#3 followed closely by #2
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:13 pm to Teacher
quote:
with RP last year we could have won the BCS Championship
quote:
Miles and his OC MUST learn to recruit good QBs.
wasnt he a miles recruit?
and what about zach lee?
No, it didnt work out well but I think they recruited good QB's one was just a lousy person and the other had too many options to pursue.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:14 pm to Bleeding purple
This season starting now? #3
This season starting 9 months ago? #2
This season starting 9 months ago? #2
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:27 pm to Doc Fenton
Although I am not a crowton fan based on stupid calls as they relate to field postion and time managment along with general lack of flow seen in the offense as a whole, I am not sure a different OC 9 months ago with the same QB talent we have could produce much better results.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:27 pm to Bleeding purple
I'll take number 2,
with # 3 coming in 2nd place,
but if I get only one I do what should have been done in the offseason and let Billy boy see what he got
with # 3 coming in 2nd place,
but if I get only one I do what should have been done in the offseason and let Billy boy see what he got

Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:55 pm to ccomeaux
quote:
Every OC should gameplan to the stregnths or away from the weaknesses of the team/QB.
"We just want him to play, have some fun, smile. Maybe do some things that he's more comfortable at, maybe simplify the game plan"
Damn shame a year was wasted trying to strip JJ down from his GT form to what he is now.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 3:36 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
1. new head coach
This would likely also change #'s 2, and 3, then eventually 4, so no way it would be the only change.
Popular
Back to top
