- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: whats the deal with Stevan Ridley's injury?
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:25 am to Chuck U Farley
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:25 am to Chuck U Farley
quote:
So with the game on the line you take Scott over Hester in short yardage. Smart
hester had a great run of conversions against UF (one was thanks to the ref) and all of a sudden he's unstoppable?
where was hester the rest of the game? if you forgot, scott tore it the frick up in the 1st half only to be benched for the inferior hester
quote:
But, Hester #'s were much better than average.
against UK? no they were mediocre
Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
miles can always override his positional coach
slow, honest question:
do you think the runningback decisions by the coaches were primarily from les or larry?
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:26 am to SlowFlowPro
miles can always override his positional coach
----------------------------------------------------------
then why have that coach if you cant count on him when its all on the line. kinda makes that coach look like he doesnt know shite in front of the team.
----------------------------------------------------------
then why have that coach if you cant count on him when its all on the line. kinda makes that coach look like he doesnt know shite in front of the team.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane
100 yards (or close?) in the first half and 2 TD's?
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:27 am to Chuck U Farley
quote:
miles can always override his positional coach
Yes maybe, but we have NO idea if he did that.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:29 am to TheDoc
no clue
i do see that under miles we're going to a "bigger instead of faster" approach as a program
and no matter what, the buck falls at miles because he can override the positional coaches
but maybe porter just likes the big bruisers instead of breakaway threats
SOMETHING is weird about it all. there are a handful of games with no logical explanation. Scott against UK. Keiland being benched after his long TD against Auburn. No Keiland in 2006 @ AU. No Scott/Keiland early against Arky when Hester was not doing well. No KW when scott wore down last year and KW was running well.
it may not be logical for them. they may just coach from the gut and ride on that, and the actual performance on the field gets lost in the shuffle. i don't know. but if there is a reason, it must be a secret, because objectively some moves are downright illogical
i do see that under miles we're going to a "bigger instead of faster" approach as a program
and no matter what, the buck falls at miles because he can override the positional coaches
but maybe porter just likes the big bruisers instead of breakaway threats
SOMETHING is weird about it all. there are a handful of games with no logical explanation. Scott against UK. Keiland being benched after his long TD against Auburn. No Keiland in 2006 @ AU. No Scott/Keiland early against Arky when Hester was not doing well. No KW when scott wore down last year and KW was running well.
it may not be logical for them. they may just coach from the gut and ride on that, and the actual performance on the field gets lost in the shuffle. i don't know. but if there is a reason, it must be a secret, because objectively some moves are downright illogical
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
against UK? no they were mediocre
Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane
---------------------------------------------------------
Short yardage dude. you cant tell me that scott was better than Hester. Where was CS on the second half of the season. Its easy to average 200 against tulane, troy, app,. Hester was good all year. go watch the sec champ game against our new dc. hester was a problem for them when he didnt have the ball.
Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane
---------------------------------------------------------
Short yardage dude. you cant tell me that scott was better than Hester. Where was CS on the second half of the season. Its easy to average 200 against tulane, troy, app,. Hester was good all year. go watch the sec champ game against our new dc. hester was a problem for them when he didnt have the ball.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:31 am to Chuck U Farley
quote:
then why have that coach if you cant count on him when its all on the line. kinda makes that coach look like he doesnt know shite in front of the team.
the frick?
coaches make mistakes. it's miles job to see the mistakes and correct them
if the positional coaches were at his level, they'd be head coaches
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:31 am to SlowFlowPro
SOMETHING is weird about it all. there are a handful of games with no logical explanation. Scott against UK. Keiland being benched after his long TD against Auburn. No Keiland in 2006 @ AU. No Scott/Keiland early against Arky when Hester was not doing well. No KW when scott wore down last year and KW was running well.
it may not be logical for them. they may just coach from the gut and ride on that, and the actual performance on the field gets lost in the shuffle. i don't know. but if there is a reason, it must be a secret, because objectively some moves are downright illogical
-----------------------------------------------------------
I fully agree with all of the above. that is odd
it may not be logical for them. they may just coach from the gut and ride on that, and the actual performance on the field gets lost in the shuffle. i don't know. but if there is a reason, it must be a secret, because objectively some moves are downright illogical
-----------------------------------------------------------
I fully agree with all of the above. that is odd
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:32 am to csand12
quote:
Yes maybe, but we have NO idea if he did that.
we only know what we see
and there are some glaring wtf moments
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
because objectively some moves are downright illogical
I concur.
I'm constantly saying to myself casually:
"MILES WHAT THE frick ARE YOU DOING?!? GOD DAMN YOU, YOU SON OF A BITCH!"
Like I said, I have that casual conversation to the TV screen a couple of times a year.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:32 am to Chuck U Farley
quote:
Short yardage dude.
we don't get to that point if we run scott and we don't go to OT
quote:
Hester was good all year.
in 2007, not against UK
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
You don't immediately pull a player for losing some yards or being in a slump for a few plays. They build confidence and a rhythm by staying in the game, just like a QB. When they're in rhythm, they're fire. When they're not, they're not and sometimes coaches choose to keep them in hoping they will get back their rhythm
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:34 am to csand12
quote:
You don't immediately pull a player for losing some yards or being in a slump for a few plays.
that's the entire point of the "hot hand" philosophy and having 4-5 capable RBs
quote:
They build confidence and a rhythm by staying in the game, just like a QB. When they're in rhythm, they're fire.
how do you know the backups won't perform better?
shite, how do you not keep playing them when the backups prove on that day, they're better?
This post was edited on 3/17/09 at 11:35 am
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:35 am to csand12
quote:
You don't immediately pull a player for losing some yards or being in a slump for a few plays. They build confidence and a rhythm by staying in the game, just like a QB. When they're in rhythm, they're fire. When they're not, they're not and sometimes coaches choose to keep them in hoping they will get back their rhythm
miles has done this A LOT fwiw
plenty of examples that make you go:
"what the frick made you think that was a good idea?"
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
shite, how do you not keep playing them when the backups prove on that day, they're better?
what else does keiland have to do to get more playing time?
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:37 am to TheDoc
also - slow, is keiland going to have his one TD limit this upcoming season? (sans vatech in 2007)
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:39 am to TheDoc
quote:
what else does keiland have to do to get more playing time?
Are you trying to provoke Slo?
Popular
Back to top



2


