Started By
Message

re: whats the deal with Stevan Ridley's injury?

Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:25 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464502 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:25 am to
quote:

So with the game on the line you take Scott over Hester in short yardage. Smart

hester had a great run of conversions against UF (one was thanks to the ref) and all of a sudden he's unstoppable?

where was hester the rest of the game? if you forgot, scott tore it the frick up in the 1st half only to be benched for the inferior hester

quote:

But, Hester #'s were much better than average.

against UK? no they were mediocre

Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:25 am to
quote:

miles can always override his positional coach


slow, honest question:

do you think the runningback decisions by the coaches were primarily from les or larry?
Posted by Chuck U Farley
The 318
Member since Oct 2007
8994 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:26 am to
miles can always override his positional coach
----------------------------------------------------------

then why have that coach if you cant count on him when its all on the line. kinda makes that coach look like he doesnt know shite in front of the team.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane


100 yards (or close?) in the first half and 2 TD's?
Posted by csand12
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
562 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:27 am to
quote:

miles can always override his positional coach


Yes maybe, but we have NO idea if he did that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464502 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:29 am to
no clue

i do see that under miles we're going to a "bigger instead of faster" approach as a program

and no matter what, the buck falls at miles because he can override the positional coaches

but maybe porter just likes the big bruisers instead of breakaway threats

SOMETHING is weird about it all. there are a handful of games with no logical explanation. Scott against UK. Keiland being benched after his long TD against Auburn. No Keiland in 2006 @ AU. No Scott/Keiland early against Arky when Hester was not doing well. No KW when scott wore down last year and KW was running well.

it may not be logical for them. they may just coach from the gut and ride on that, and the actual performance on the field gets lost in the shuffle. i don't know. but if there is a reason, it must be a secret, because objectively some moves are downright illogical
Posted by Chuck U Farley
The 318
Member since Oct 2007
8994 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:30 am to
against UK? no they were mediocre

Scott's numbers against UK were pretty insane
---------------------------------------------------------

Short yardage dude. you cant tell me that scott was better than Hester. Where was CS on the second half of the season. Its easy to average 200 against tulane, troy, app,. Hester was good all year. go watch the sec champ game against our new dc. hester was a problem for them when he didnt have the ball.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464502 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:31 am to
quote:

then why have that coach if you cant count on him when its all on the line. kinda makes that coach look like he doesnt know shite in front of the team.

the frick?

coaches make mistakes. it's miles job to see the mistakes and correct them

if the positional coaches were at his level, they'd be head coaches
Posted by Chuck U Farley
The 318
Member since Oct 2007
8994 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:31 am to
SOMETHING is weird about it all. there are a handful of games with no logical explanation. Scott against UK. Keiland being benched after his long TD against Auburn. No Keiland in 2006 @ AU. No Scott/Keiland early against Arky when Hester was not doing well. No KW when scott wore down last year and KW was running well.

it may not be logical for them. they may just coach from the gut and ride on that, and the actual performance on the field gets lost in the shuffle. i don't know. but if there is a reason, it must be a secret, because objectively some moves are downright illogical
-----------------------------------------------------------

I fully agree with all of the above. that is odd
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464502 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Yes maybe, but we have NO idea if he did that.

we only know what we see

and there are some glaring wtf moments
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:32 am to
quote:

because objectively some moves are downright illogical


I concur.

I'm constantly saying to myself casually:

"MILES WHAT THE frick ARE YOU DOING?!? GOD DAMN YOU, YOU SON OF A BITCH!"

Like I said, I have that casual conversation to the TV screen a couple of times a year.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464502 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Short yardage dude.

we don't get to that point if we run scott and we don't go to OT

quote:

Hester was good all year.

in 2007, not against UK
Posted by csand12
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
562 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:33 am to
You don't immediately pull a player for losing some yards or being in a slump for a few plays. They build confidence and a rhythm by staying in the game, just like a QB. When they're in rhythm, they're fire. When they're not, they're not and sometimes coaches choose to keep them in hoping they will get back their rhythm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464502 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:34 am to
quote:

You don't immediately pull a player for losing some yards or being in a slump for a few plays.

that's the entire point of the "hot hand" philosophy and having 4-5 capable RBs

quote:

They build confidence and a rhythm by staying in the game, just like a QB. When they're in rhythm, they're fire.

how do you know the backups won't perform better?

shite, how do you not keep playing them when the backups prove on that day, they're better?
This post was edited on 3/17/09 at 11:35 am
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:35 am to
quote:

You don't immediately pull a player for losing some yards or being in a slump for a few plays. They build confidence and a rhythm by staying in the game, just like a QB. When they're in rhythm, they're fire. When they're not, they're not and sometimes coaches choose to keep them in hoping they will get back their rhythm


miles has done this A LOT fwiw

plenty of examples that make you go:

"what the frick made you think that was a good idea?"
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:36 am to
quote:

shite, how do you not keep playing them when the backups prove on that day, they're better?


what else does keiland have to do to get more playing time?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:37 am to
also - slow, is keiland going to have his one TD limit this upcoming season? (sans vatech in 2007)
Posted by csand12
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
562 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:39 am to
quote:

what else does keiland have to do to get more playing time?


Are you trying to provoke Slo?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:42 am to
Posted by csand12
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
562 posts
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:45 am to
Doc I love your quote
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram