- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your optimal JL/JJ split?
Posted on 10/12/10 at 2:59 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 10/12/10 at 2:59 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Yes, there is; send JJ to the bench.
And you know, for a fact, that JL is ready to be the full time starter...how exactly?
Answer: you don't.
We are talking in circles. Based on the improvement in both QB's the last two games, I'm going to trust the staff's decision on who starts and who gets the majority of the snaps.
You obviously have your mind made up, and never mind the facts.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 2:59 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
Come on man...you can be fair...I know you can do it.
JJ runs the football. he runs ok for a qb. he passes like garbage, a BIG problem for a qb.
JL passes well for a qb. To run the ball we use ANY OF THE STABLE OF RB's we have on the team.
fair.
/thread.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:01 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
And you know, for a fact, that JL is ready to be the full time starter...how exactly?
No one will know til he actually does....that's sort of the point Einstein
quote:
ou obviously have your mind made up, and never mind the facts.
I provide you with facts. You choose to believe something that the performances don;t support. Who again is in denial?
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:11 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
I do, and the box score agrees with me.
how's this for a score...112...thats the rank of the offense when he's in the game
example...
If I charge down the field 99 yds...thowing, handing off to RB's etc...and then JJ comes in on the 1 and gets in the endzone...is it his?..no .could we have gone that one more yard with out him? yes..
quote:
100 yards passing and 42 yards rushing say differently. But don't let facts get in your way, you're rolling
oh your one of those stat spinning people...stats dont mean shite when you spin them......its obvious you know nothing...
quote:
I'd rather see JJ try and run into the endzone rather than JL, who you can time with a sundial
who sais JL had to run them....we have RB's you know...and Shep and TT and RR...point is anyone could have done what JJ did...no one (on this team) could have done what JL did.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:11 pm to novowels
quote:
JL - 90%
RS/SW - 10%
JJ - 0%
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:12 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
Come on man...you can be fair...I know you can do it.
Ok, I might let JJ run it when were on the 1 inch line....ok?....and thats not because of his running ability its his height...so other wise you could just put TT there...so the might is like 99% no 1% maybe....
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:12 pm to CptBengal
quote:
JJ runs the football. he runs ok for a qb. he passes like garbage, a BIG problem for a qb.
JL passes well for a qb. To run the ball we use ANY OF THE STABLE OF RB's we have on the team.
fair.
/thread.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:13 pm to TigerFan55555
The whole reason we have a two QB system is both QB's are better in it than they are out of it.
It's not rocket science.

It's not rocket science.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:13 pm to CptBengal
quote:
JJ runs the football. he runs ok for a qb. he passes like garbage, a BIG problem for a qb.
JL passes well for a qb. To run the ball we use ANY OF THE STABLE OF RB's we have on the team.
fair.
/thread.
I wasn't talking to you, but I'll take what I can get.
And that was pretty fair...and I like using our RBs most of the time, but mixing QB runs in there is also effective. I think we've proven that.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:14 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
And you know, for a fact, that JL is ready to be the full time starter...how exactly?
oh jesus christ...ur shitting me...
idiot..
quote:
I'm going to trust the staff's decision on who starts and who gets the majority of the snaps.
proof of being an idiot..
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:14 pm to CptBengal
quote:
No one will know til he actually does....that's sort of the point Einstein
And no one knows if Lee is ready to handle the position full time...Einstein.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:17 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
And no one knows if Lee is ready to handle the position full time...Einstein.
So we should NEVER start another QB other than Jefferson...EVER. After all ,they've never started before...how will we know if they are ready?
Hell don't start anyone EVER who hasn't started before.
(I'm laughing at you)Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:18 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
proof of being an idiot..
What, calling someone names when you run out of ideas? Yes, that's the definition in my book.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:19 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
and I like using our RBs most of the time, but mixing QB runs in there is also effective. I think we've proven that.
that's why 90/10 sounds like a good split.
tofg's idea of 50/50 is idiotic.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:21 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
LSU was the better team in both the games against Tennessee and against Fla, would you agree? And would you also agree that it took last minute comebacks to get the win?
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:22 pm to CptBengal
quote:
So we should NEVER start another QB other than Jefferson...EVER. After all ,they've never started before...how will we know if they are ready?
Hell don't start anyone EVER who hasn't started before.
(I'm laughing at you)
So you're determined to make a change, no matter that the yards have gone up the last two games for both QB's since the two QB system was implemented? You're saying we should fix what obviously isn't broken? really?
You will never be a coach.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:29 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
JJ is one of the worst qb's statistically IN THE ENTIRE FBS.
That is a fact. Lee is playing lights out.
To continue to play JJ is INSANE.
But keep saying if it works.....I mean I **could** put a screw into a piece of wood with a hammer, or I could use the RIGHT tool and use a screwdriver.
Both work, one works infinitely better.
That is a fact. Lee is playing lights out.
To continue to play JJ is INSANE.
But keep saying if it works.....I mean I **could** put a screw into a piece of wood with a hammer, or I could use the RIGHT tool and use a screwdriver.
Both work, one works infinitely better.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:32 pm to CptBengal
I know this is a difficult concept, but LSU is winning with a two QB system, and both QB's have improved the last two games since it was implemented. Heck, they've improved from one game to the next, and UF's defense is one of the best in the SEC.
It ain't broke. So what dumbass would mess with it?
Oh right.

It ain't broke. So what dumbass would mess with it?
Oh right.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:35 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
and both QB's have improved
what were JJ's numbers against UT again...oh yeah:
3/12
30 yds
0 tds
2 ints.
Yep, he's improved BOTH games as you said....FAIL.
quote:
It ain't broke. So what dumbass would mess with it?
Oh right.
Didn't you just lambaste some other poster above for calling people names when you have run out of legitimate arguments
Like i said, you can do it this way and cede half our offensive possessions per game to punt or int.....or we can put JL in and have drives that end in points.
But don't let a thing like scoring, or giving the vaunted D a much needed rest, stop you from cheering for JJ.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 3:39 pm to CptBengal
JJ should get 90% of his snaps
when we are ahead by 20+ points
when we are ahead by 20+ points
Popular
Back to top



2





