Started By
Message

re: What is the intent of NIL?

Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:33 am to
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40032 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The intent is NIL is to give the kids that are making billions for corporations, ncaa and their institutions a chance to share in those profits because they wouldn’t exist without them

Corporate cucks and boot lickers HATE the new NIL rules
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40032 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:34 am to
quote:

So if that's not the intent, then you tell us the mission statement of NIL? I'd like to read it

What are you even asking? The intent is for student athletes to be able to make money. However much money someone wants to pay them. It’s not rocket science
This post was edited on 12/18/21 at 11:36 am
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
21658 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Universities would survive without football... because the world needs an education more than it needs to be entertained. 


Yet here you are all pissy because the actors who entertain you on the gridiron have an opportunity to get paid for the own name, image & likeness now. You clearly stated this upsets you because it's affecting & changing the sport that YOU love. Sounds like a personal problem. One that revolves around fear of change as well as being a control freak.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40032 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:37 am to
Why do you hate freedom? frickin fascists smh
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
21658 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Corporate cucks and boot lickers HATE the new NIL rules


Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
21658 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Why do you hate freedom?


Apex woke up with NIL on his mind. He probably was slamming doors & cabinets on his way take his morning piss.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Apex woke up with NIL on his mind. He probably was slamming doors & cabinets on his way take his morning piss.


Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

What are you even asking? The intent is for student athletes to be able to make money. However much money someone wants to pay them. It’s not rocket science


So you're saying we don't need to talk about this further?

fine by me...

Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67851 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

we're talking about amateur sports.


Well only because the NCAA artificially handicapped the market.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Well only because the NCAA artificially handicapped the market.



NCAA Mission Statement:

Our purpose is to govern competition in a fair, safe, equitable and sportsmanlike manner, and to integrate intercollegiate athletics into higher education so that the educational experience of the student-athlete is paramount.

NCAA Core Values
The Association - through its member institutions, conferences and national office staff - shares a belief in and commitment to:

The collegiate model of athletics in which students participate as an avocation, balancing their academic, social and athletics experiences.

The highest levels of integrity and sportsmanship.

The pursuit of excellence in both academics and athletics.

The supporting role that intercollegiate athletics plays in the higher education mission and in enhancing the sense of community and strengthening the
identity of member institutions.

An inclusive culture that fosters equitable participation for student-athletes and career opportunities for coaches and administrators from diverse backgrounds.

Respect for institutional autonomy and philosophical differences.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
11693 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

These players have no brand until they get noticed on TV wearing a particular uniform...

This is such a tired argument. Justin Timberlake had no brand until people saw him on Disney. So what?
quote:

They have talent few even know about coming out of high school.

This is what matters. Talent = value. If you really want to discuss the value proposition for the schools and players you will realize that the truth reveals a harsh reality.

It doesn’t matter that Justin Timberlake became famous at Disney, because his talent was ultimately the reason for success. He was free to weigh the pros and cons of working at Disney, or anywhere else, and decide accordingly. In all likelihood, Disney represented the best short term financial decision and the best long-term development opportunity. Why? Because the relationship is mutually beneficial, and Disney knows they stand to gain as well.

So yes - Bryce Young has a “brand” because he plays for Alabama, in a sense. But Bryce Young has talent and could just as easily build his brand somewhere else. In theory he should be able to weigh the benefits - in terms of exposure, compensation, personal development, etc. - of taking his talents to any program.

The difference is that Disney can’t legally collude with the rest of the entertainment industry to set the price of talent, or limitations on what other business deals that talent can enter into. At least not without agreeing to collective bargaining.

You’re asking about the intent of NIL rules, but you’re missing the point. NIL is a half-measure that only delays the inevitable conclusion - that either it turns into a true free market for players, or the NCAA member institutions go into collective bargaining with the players to try and maintain parity. That’s where this is headed.

If you’re waiting for the good ole days of “student athletes” to return, you’re naive about the reality of college football. It’s too big and there’s too much money involved. The amount of money already being spent at top programs on staff, amenities, recruiting, etc. should be a clear indication of that.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40032 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

lostinbr

Well stated
Posted by rob62
Member since Sep 2016
5165 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

billions


Hardly
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
11693 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Universities would survive without football... because the world needs an education more than it needs to be entertained. One is a need the other a want.

football as we know it today would not survive without universities.

If you really believe football is that unimportant in the grand scheme of things, why are you posting here? Why do you care? I said this before and received no response other than a downvote: if that’s how you feel, eliminate all university/conference TV contracts, restrict game attendance to current students/faculty only, eliminate athletic scholarships, and put coaches on the same pay scale as teaching staff.

The reality is that the vast majority of college football fans care more about on-field success than they do about the educational prowess of the university. You might not agree with it, but that’s reality.
quote:

with out fans loving their schools as they do, you could never get a farm league that preps for the NFL like we have today in college football...

It wouldn't work financially...

The value of a player's name is skyrocketed when they sign a scholarship.

But now we talked ourselves into believing that's not fair to not allow players to make money off this "partnership"

The hilarious part of this is that you’re making the exact argument for why the NCAA and it’s member institutions are violating antitrust laws.

There would be no market for directional drillers without oil & gas companies. That doesn’t mean that all of the oil & gas companies can enter into an agreement to set formal limits on salaries for directional drillers. That would be wage fixing, and it’s illegal.

It’s the same reason that the NCAA member institutions can’t legally set formal limits on coaching salary pools. That would also be wage fixing, and it’s illegal.

Some of you are hung up on the fact that the athletes already receive compensation - in the form of exposure, scholarships, stipends, etc. - and your argument is that they don’t deserve a bigger piece of the pie. You’re missing the point. The problem isn’t the specific monetary value - it’s that the NCAA is artificially fixing that value.

If the players aren’t employees, then the NCAA has no business restricting their income from third parties (e.g. NIL) - regardless of the reasons behind that income. If the players are employees, the NCAA can’t restrict their compensation from universities without allowing any collective bargaining. The NCAA wants to have it both ways.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

This is such a tired argument. Justin Timberlake had no brand until people saw him on Disney. So what?


are you really comparing a young singing career with a HS player athlete/ college student who signed a scholarship from a university?

LSU is a publicly funded institution, thus scholarships in part are funded by Louisiana residents, while Disney is a corporation which makes billions in profits, so there is zero correlation in what they do relative to "talent", so you're argument doesn't hold water

quote:

This is what matters. Talent = value


yeah well it's unproven, un developed talent...that's why we pay coaches what we do to help young men become committed to getting better...in many areas ..Coach Kelly has spoken a lot about this already.

quote:

So yes - Bryce Young has a “brand” because he plays for Alabama, in a sense. But Bryce Young has talent and could just as easily build his brand somewhere else


on another campus yes, but not outside the NCAA. There is no national championship, no Heisman award outside of this thing called College Football. Universities and tradition hold this treasure...

quote:

You’re asking about the intent of NIL rules, but you’re missing the point. NIL is a half-measure that only delays the inevitable conclusion - that either it turns into a true free market for players, or the NCAA member institutions go into collective bargaining with the players to try and maintain parity. That’s where this is headed


The harsh reality is this is first and foremost a university environment...not a professional sports environment,...College football is a business, yes in a sense people pay to watch football. There is a consumer piece of this.

but the players are students...always will be..because you have to academically qualify, you have to go to class, you have make your grades to get on the field and stay on the field. 98% of all football players never sniff the NFL...

so we have to focus on the 98%...when we talk about the business of college football

if what you are describing became a reality, then college football would have to leave the NCAA all together...

at that point , where do we go?

quote:

If you’re waiting for the good ole days of “student athletes” to return, you’re naive about the reality of college football. It’s too big and there’s too much money involved. The amount of money already being spent at top programs on staff, amenities, recruiting, etc. should be a clear indication of that.


I think the salaries are way out of bounds.

The facility spending is crazy

my argument is, the arena in which competition is held belongs to the schools...it's governed by the NCAA.

rights belong to players and business owners...but contract agreements must be 100% free of school connections and we all know it's not that way...





Posted by SBC
Member since Oct 2005
6880 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:47 pm to
The intent is that universities and coaches make millions on the back of athletes work.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

f you really believe football is that unimportant in the grand scheme of things, why are you posting here?


I am here because I love College football, I love LSU...I care a lot that the game could lose it's unique place in American sports. Very special.

We don't want another pro league and that's kind of what is being suggested in your arguments. "Just accept it"...

well, I am not okay with it and you shouldn't either if you love College football.

If the players aren’t employees, then the NCAA has no business restricting their income from third parties (e.g. NIL) - regardless of the reasons behind that income. If the players are employees, the NCAA can’t restrict their compensation from universities without allowing any collective bargaining. The NCAA wants to have it both ways.[/quote]

I think it has to do more with the beginning of college sports, the long lasting traditions when money was scarce, fast forwarding to what TV did to the sport....I think the NCAA struggles with holding on to the past and not knowing how to control the monster...



Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

The intent is that universities and coaches make millions on the back of athletes work.


Thanks for joining us Colin Kapernick.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54947 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

The intent is that universities and coaches make millions on the back of athletes work.


How many backs and how much money should player get under your thesis/understanding of the NIL?
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33833 posts
Posted on 12/18/21 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

the point of a University is higher learning, not signing some deal for "team"



College sports has not been about higher learning though, it's been about making money.

Do programs that make more money reinvest that into the student-athletes, or do the student-athletes more or less receive the same benefits regardless of the AD's bottom line? If an AD grows revenues from say $150m to $220m, do the student-athletes receive the bulk of that in increased benefits?
This post was edited on 12/18/21 at 2:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram