- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the intent of NIL?
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:33 am to tiger1014
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:33 am to tiger1014
quote:
The intent is NIL is to give the kids that are making billions for corporations, ncaa and their institutions a chance to share in those profits because they wouldn’t exist without them
Corporate cucks and boot lickers HATE the new NIL rules
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:34 am to ApexTiger
quote:
So if that's not the intent, then you tell us the mission statement of NIL? I'd like to read it
What are you even asking? The intent is for student athletes to be able to make money. However much money someone wants to pay them. It’s not rocket science
This post was edited on 12/18/21 at 11:36 am
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:36 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Universities would survive without football... because the world needs an education more than it needs to be entertained.
Yet here you are all pissy because the actors who entertain you on the gridiron have an opportunity to get paid for the own name, image & likeness now. You clearly stated this upsets you because it's affecting & changing the sport that YOU love. Sounds like a personal problem. One that revolves around fear of change as well as being a control freak.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:37 am to ApexTiger
Why do you hate freedom? frickin fascists smh
Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:39 am to lsu2006
quote:
Corporate cucks and boot lickers HATE the new NIL rules

Posted on 12/18/21 at 11:42 am to lsu2006
quote:
Why do you hate freedom?
Apex woke up with NIL on his mind. He probably was slamming doors & cabinets on his way take his morning piss.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:07 pm to BigBrod81
quote:
Apex woke up with NIL on his mind. He probably was slamming doors & cabinets on his way take his morning piss.

Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:10 pm to lsu2006
quote:
What are you even asking? The intent is for student athletes to be able to make money. However much money someone wants to pay them. It’s not rocket science
So you're saying we don't need to talk about this further?
fine by me...
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:11 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
we're talking about amateur sports.
Well only because the NCAA artificially handicapped the market.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:17 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
Well only because the NCAA artificially handicapped the market.
NCAA Mission Statement:
Our purpose is to govern competition in a fair, safe, equitable and sportsmanlike manner, and to integrate intercollegiate athletics into higher education so that the educational experience of the student-athlete is paramount.
NCAA Core Values
The Association - through its member institutions, conferences and national office staff - shares a belief in and commitment to:
The collegiate model of athletics in which students participate as an avocation, balancing their academic, social and athletics experiences.
The highest levels of integrity and sportsmanship.
The pursuit of excellence in both academics and athletics.
The supporting role that intercollegiate athletics plays in the higher education mission and in enhancing the sense of community and strengthening the
identity of member institutions.
An inclusive culture that fosters equitable participation for student-athletes and career opportunities for coaches and administrators from diverse backgrounds.
Respect for institutional autonomy and philosophical differences.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:40 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
These players have no brand until they get noticed on TV wearing a particular uniform...
This is such a tired argument. Justin Timberlake had no brand until people saw him on Disney. So what?
quote:
They have talent few even know about coming out of high school.
This is what matters. Talent = value. If you really want to discuss the value proposition for the schools and players you will realize that the truth reveals a harsh reality.
It doesn’t matter that Justin Timberlake became famous at Disney, because his talent was ultimately the reason for success. He was free to weigh the pros and cons of working at Disney, or anywhere else, and decide accordingly. In all likelihood, Disney represented the best short term financial decision and the best long-term development opportunity. Why? Because the relationship is mutually beneficial, and Disney knows they stand to gain as well.
So yes - Bryce Young has a “brand” because he plays for Alabama, in a sense. But Bryce Young has talent and could just as easily build his brand somewhere else. In theory he should be able to weigh the benefits - in terms of exposure, compensation, personal development, etc. - of taking his talents to any program.
The difference is that Disney can’t legally collude with the rest of the entertainment industry to set the price of talent, or limitations on what other business deals that talent can enter into. At least not without agreeing to collective bargaining.
You’re asking about the intent of NIL rules, but you’re missing the point. NIL is a half-measure that only delays the inevitable conclusion - that either it turns into a true free market for players, or the NCAA member institutions go into collective bargaining with the players to try and maintain parity. That’s where this is headed.
If you’re waiting for the good ole days of “student athletes” to return, you’re naive about the reality of college football. It’s too big and there’s too much money involved. The amount of money already being spent at top programs on staff, amenities, recruiting, etc. should be a clear indication of that.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 12:45 pm to lostinbr
quote:
lostinbr
Well stated
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:34 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Universities would survive without football... because the world needs an education more than it needs to be entertained. One is a need the other a want.
football as we know it today would not survive without universities.
If you really believe football is that unimportant in the grand scheme of things, why are you posting here? Why do you care? I said this before and received no response other than a downvote: if that’s how you feel, eliminate all university/conference TV contracts, restrict game attendance to current students/faculty only, eliminate athletic scholarships, and put coaches on the same pay scale as teaching staff.
The reality is that the vast majority of college football fans care more about on-field success than they do about the educational prowess of the university. You might not agree with it, but that’s reality.
quote:
with out fans loving their schools as they do, you could never get a farm league that preps for the NFL like we have today in college football...
It wouldn't work financially...
The value of a player's name is skyrocketed when they sign a scholarship.
But now we talked ourselves into believing that's not fair to not allow players to make money off this "partnership"
The hilarious part of this is that you’re making the exact argument for why the NCAA and it’s member institutions are violating antitrust laws.

There would be no market for directional drillers without oil & gas companies. That doesn’t mean that all of the oil & gas companies can enter into an agreement to set formal limits on salaries for directional drillers. That would be wage fixing, and it’s illegal.
It’s the same reason that the NCAA member institutions can’t legally set formal limits on coaching salary pools. That would also be wage fixing, and it’s illegal.
Some of you are hung up on the fact that the athletes already receive compensation - in the form of exposure, scholarships, stipends, etc. - and your argument is that they don’t deserve a bigger piece of the pie. You’re missing the point. The problem isn’t the specific monetary value - it’s that the NCAA is artificially fixing that value.
If the players aren’t employees, then the NCAA has no business restricting their income from third parties (e.g. NIL) - regardless of the reasons behind that income. If the players are employees, the NCAA can’t restrict their compensation from universities without allowing any collective bargaining. The NCAA wants to have it both ways.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:38 pm to lostinbr
quote:
This is such a tired argument. Justin Timberlake had no brand until people saw him on Disney. So what?
are you really comparing a young singing career with a HS player athlete/ college student who signed a scholarship from a university?
LSU is a publicly funded institution, thus scholarships in part are funded by Louisiana residents, while Disney is a corporation which makes billions in profits, so there is zero correlation in what they do relative to "talent", so you're argument doesn't hold water
quote:
This is what matters. Talent = value
yeah well it's unproven, un developed talent...that's why we pay coaches what we do to help young men become committed to getting better...in many areas ..Coach Kelly has spoken a lot about this already.
quote:
So yes - Bryce Young has a “brand” because he plays for Alabama, in a sense. But Bryce Young has talent and could just as easily build his brand somewhere else
on another campus yes, but not outside the NCAA. There is no national championship, no Heisman award outside of this thing called College Football. Universities and tradition hold this treasure...
quote:
You’re asking about the intent of NIL rules, but you’re missing the point. NIL is a half-measure that only delays the inevitable conclusion - that either it turns into a true free market for players, or the NCAA member institutions go into collective bargaining with the players to try and maintain parity. That’s where this is headed
The harsh reality is this is first and foremost a university environment...not a professional sports environment,...College football is a business, yes in a sense people pay to watch football. There is a consumer piece of this.
but the players are students...always will be..because you have to academically qualify, you have to go to class, you have make your grades to get on the field and stay on the field. 98% of all football players never sniff the NFL...
so we have to focus on the 98%...when we talk about the business of college football
if what you are describing became a reality, then college football would have to leave the NCAA all together...
at that point , where do we go?
quote:
If you’re waiting for the good ole days of “student athletes” to return, you’re naive about the reality of college football. It’s too big and there’s too much money involved. The amount of money already being spent at top programs on staff, amenities, recruiting, etc. should be a clear indication of that.
I think the salaries are way out of bounds.
The facility spending is crazy
my argument is, the arena in which competition is held belongs to the schools...it's governed by the NCAA.
rights belong to players and business owners...but contract agreements must be 100% free of school connections and we all know it's not that way...
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:47 pm to ApexTiger
The intent is that universities and coaches make millions on the back of athletes work.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:49 pm to lostinbr
quote:
f you really believe football is that unimportant in the grand scheme of things, why are you posting here?
I am here because I love College football, I love LSU...I care a lot that the game could lose it's unique place in American sports. Very special.
We don't want another pro league and that's kind of what is being suggested in your arguments. "Just accept it"...
well, I am not okay with it and you shouldn't either if you love College football.
If the players aren’t employees, then the NCAA has no business restricting their income from third parties (e.g. NIL) - regardless of the reasons behind that income. If the players are employees, the NCAA can’t restrict their compensation from universities without allowing any collective bargaining. The NCAA wants to have it both ways.[/quote]
I think it has to do more with the beginning of college sports, the long lasting traditions when money was scarce, fast forwarding to what TV did to the sport....I think the NCAA struggles with holding on to the past and not knowing how to control the monster...
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:50 pm to SBC
quote:
The intent is that universities and coaches make millions on the back of athletes work.
Thanks for joining us Colin Kapernick.
Posted on 12/18/21 at 1:59 pm to SBC
quote:
The intent is that universities and coaches make millions on the back of athletes work.
How many backs and how much money should player get under your thesis/understanding of the NIL?
Posted on 12/18/21 at 2:11 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
the point of a University is higher learning, not signing some deal for "team"
College sports has not been about higher learning though, it's been about making money.
Do programs that make more money reinvest that into the student-athletes, or do the student-athletes more or less receive the same benefits regardless of the AD's bottom line? If an AD grows revenues from say $150m to $220m, do the student-athletes receive the bulk of that in increased benefits?
This post was edited on 12/18/21 at 2:13 pm
Popular
Back to top
