- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Updated odds to win the CWS as of June 15th
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:11 am to LSUSkip
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:11 am to LSUSkip
quote:No. they have to play the loser of UCLA/LSU on Tuesday. I do not think DVH is going to throw Root in that game under any circumstances. Even with only 38 pitches he's not going to throw him on Saturday then turn around and throw him on Tuesday.
Don't you mean loser?
I think he MAY throw him on Wednesday vs the winner of LSU/UCLA (if Arkansas makes it) but that's the earliest he may throw him and honestly he may not send him out that early.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:18 am to 225Tyga
quote:
So if they were -400 and you bet a $100 and won $25 by your logic you would have lost $75?
quote:No it's not about how you look at it lol. Do you understand betting? You're never going to owe more than you bet.
This scenario I look at like if I bet $100 and win I’m getting $100 back but if I lose then I owe $400
Same strokes for different folks. All about how you look at it
If you bet $100 you never are going to owe $400. That's not what -400 means.
If LSU were -400 favorites and you bet $100
Either
LSU would win and you would have $25 you win
Or
LSU would lose and you would lose $100
In no circumstances would you lose $400 lol
I made that post to call you out about the jinx but this is honestly kind of fascinating to hear you try to justify betting odds when you've clearly never bet on anything.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:27 am to Solo Cam
quote:
Do you understand betting? You're never going to owe more than you bet.
Someone’s never had a bookie
quote:
justify betting odds when you've clearly never bet on anything
Not trying to justify anything. Just explaining to you how I look at betting. All about how you look it at my friend!
quote:
you've clearly never bet on anything.
Holy Fkn Airball! Are you new here?
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 11:31 am
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:58 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
So you’re saying there’s a chance?
So you’re telling me there’s a chance.
Get it right.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:59 am to Harald Ekernson
quote:
So you’re telling me there’s a chance.
Get it right.
So sorry. Are you dumb or dumber?
Only one of them would take such a strong offense to one word difference.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 12:00 pm to 225Tyga
quote:Wait, you've bet an amount before and a bookie made you pay more than you bet?
Someone’s never had a bookie
quote:So one more time,
Not trying to justify anything. Just explaining to you how I look at betting. All about how you look it at my friend!
So if LSU was -400 and you bet $100 on them and they won. And $25 extra dollars was deposited in your account would you say you lost $75 dollars then?
quote:I know who you are. I noticed you when I made an avatar with Burrow a couple of years back and you immediately started using it too. It was strange but I remember you from that. Now you're the annoying guy who does fake bravado on this board. I used to think it was a troll job that you thought was funny. But over the years I've realized you actually believe the shite you say.
Holy Fkn Airball! Are you new here?
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 6/15/25 at 12:04 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Only one of them would take such a strong offense to one word difference.
By my count you are off by two words.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 12:10 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
So if LSU was -400 and you bet $100 on them and they won. And $25 extra dollars was deposited in your account would you say you lost $75 dollars then?
Wager vs Win amount is the difference. I don’t look at it in terms of wager amount, I look at it in terms of “win” amounts.
quote:
I know who you are. I noticed you….a couple of years back
Posted on 6/15/25 at 12:26 pm to 225Tyga
quote:So betting on any favorite is always a negative amount gained?
Wager vs Win amount is the difference. I don’t look at it in terms of wager amount, I look at it in terms of “win” amounts.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 12:44 pm to Solo Cam
Holy shite…. LSU is +125 solid you bet $100 you win $125 and you get your original $100 back. So you now have $225…. Are you retarded
Posted on 6/15/25 at 12:50 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
they have to play the loser of UCLA/LSU on Tuesday.
I got it now, I had to look at the format.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 2:15 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
So you’re saying there’s a chance?
I’ve frequented this board and don’t believe it. LSU is obviously overmatched and the coaching staff are morons.
I remember when LSU wouldn’t make a regional, wouldn’t be a national seed, wouldn’t win a regional, wouldn’t win a super regional and couldn’t beat Arkansas.
Stupidest fans in all of sports lurk on this board.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 2:29 pm to Solo Cam
Root is throwing Tuesday if they beat Murray state
Posted on 6/15/25 at 6:33 pm to AZTiger7072
quote:
Holy shite…. LSU is +125 solid you bet $100 you win $125 and you get your original $100 back. So you now have $225…. Are you retarded
So what is 225-100?
Posted on 6/15/25 at 6:33 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
I got it now, I had to look at the format.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 6:39 pm to TigerMonkey7
quote:Wanna bet?
Root is throwing Tuesday if they beat Murray state
Posted on 6/15/25 at 7:12 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
Correct. The way I look at odds like that is if I’m going to make a $100 bet and win then I would get $100 back so if they’re going to pay me $125 that’s a free extra $25 that I’ll happily take To each their own
You don’t understand it.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:24 am to Mikeyj3
Arkansas odds are now +280 from +600 on Saturday. Like I said, those were great odds at the time. But we have idiots on here that want to argue they weren't and are brain dead about sports betting
Back to top


1






