
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

These teams did not use their full allotment of roster spots
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:48 pm
Florida - 104 - Kept 1 spot open for in-season roster flexibility.
Missouri - 104 - Held 1 spot open for potential fall transfer/addition.
LSU - 103 - Left 2 spots open (holding off on Dae'Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris).
South Carolina- 104 - Left 1 spot vacant entering Week 1.
Vanderbilt - 103 - Carried 103 rostered players into Week 1.
So obviously all of these should be punished under the guise that they're all holding spots for NFL players
Missouri - 104 - Held 1 spot open for potential fall transfer/addition.
LSU - 103 - Left 2 spots open (holding off on Dae'Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris).
South Carolina- 104 - Left 1 spot vacant entering Week 1.
Vanderbilt - 103 - Carried 103 rostered players into Week 1.
So obviously all of these should be punished under the guise that they're all holding spots for NFL players
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:50 pm to The Egg
Yeah but none of those schools have Lane kiffin
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:54 pm to The Egg
Oklahoma must've had spots open because they just added some guys on from the 5th year waiver wire that is totally unlike professional football.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:56 pm to The Egg
Kick them all out. They’re obviously trying to add pro players.

Popular
Back to top
3








