- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There seems to be the idea that Georgia's run defense is overrated..
Posted on 12/1/11 at 9:53 am to WG_Dawg
Posted on 12/1/11 at 9:53 am to WG_Dawg
Those numbers are impressive indeed. LSU held three of the top 5 rushers in the NCAA TO <100 yds- Lamichael James, Trent Richardson, and the dude from Western KY.
Posted on 12/1/11 at 10:06 am to WG_Dawg
Just show up on Saturday. We'll find out how good you are.
Posted on 12/1/11 at 10:08 am to WG_Dawg
the UGA defense is not even in the same universe; however, with all the bulletin board material they've provided, they may rank #1 in dumbest unit.
Posted on 12/1/11 at 10:11 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
If you don't take rational, civil discussion about the upcoming game seriously, what do you take seriously?
i take it very seriously. and i enjoy it. i'm just syin, if you think youre gonna find that on this board youll be frustrated. especially with the success of this year.
Posted on 12/1/11 at 10:13 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
In regards to what you posted, wouldnt' that just mean that we have a good knack for getting to the QB?
I never said they didn't but attributing sacks to rush defense is stupid. Yes, I know that is how it is done in the NCAA but it makes no sense and as such it makes your rushing defense numbers seem a little better than they actually are.
Posted on 12/1/11 at 11:38 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
I never said they didn't but attributing sacks to rush defense is stupid. Yes, I know that is how it is done in the NCAA but it makes no sense and as such it makes your rushing defense numbers seem a little better than they actually are.
two way street - affects our stats too-
UGA sacks----yds----LSU sacks----yds
miss------- 4 ----- 42 ------ 4 ---------29
msu-------- 5 ----- 37 ------ 6 ---------37
ut -------- 3 ----- 32 ------ 0 ---------0
uf -------- 6 ----- 43 ------ 1 ---------5
ky -------- 5 ----- 29 ------ 5 ---------24
au -------- 5 ----- 27 ------ 6 ---------56
tot ------ 28 -----210 ----- 22 ---------151
Posted on 12/1/11 at 11:45 am to WG_Dawg
TEAM/OPPENENT DIV 1 RUSHING RANK
Boise ST #53
South Cackalacky #25
Ole Piss #84
Misses State #40
Tenn #116
Vandy #42
Florida #73
New Mexican State #89
Auburned #35
UKanDoit #88
GTech #3 (against that stout ACC)
LSU #17
Just don't really see amazing stuff here to justify putting UGA's run D on a pedestal. Decent maybe but nothing I'd be bragging about. GT plays a lot of crap schools with that high school offense.
Boise ST #53
South Cackalacky #25
Ole Piss #84
Misses State #40
Tenn #116
Vandy #42
Florida #73
New Mexican State #89
Auburned #35
UKanDoit #88
GTech #3 (against that stout ACC)
LSU #17
Just don't really see amazing stuff here to justify putting UGA's run D on a pedestal. Decent maybe but nothing I'd be bragging about. GT plays a lot of crap schools with that high school offense.
Posted on 12/1/11 at 11:51 am to WG_Dawg
WG_Dawg
Don't expect to get any many reasonable responses here. Anyone with eyes and a brain can see that Ga. is a team growing in confidence and skill. On both sides of the ball, I expect the Bulldogs to give the Tigers all they can handle.
to a good game.
And an LSU win of course.
Don't expect to get any many reasonable responses here. Anyone with eyes and a brain can see that Ga. is a team growing in confidence and skill. On both sides of the ball, I expect the Bulldogs to give the Tigers all they can handle.

And an LSU win of course.
Popular
Back to top
