- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The following QB's had worse Efficiency ratings than JJ
Posted on 12/15/09 at 1:38 pm to TigerFan55555
Posted on 12/15/09 at 1:38 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:This never happened to Tim Tebow or Colt McCoy. . .
yes sir...
FACT!
0
Posted on 12/15/09 at 1:40 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
congadulations? And called him stupid. You do know is congrats, right? There is no d in it stupid
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WE AGREE ON SOMETHING!!!
Jeeze, you can't even tell when people are making fun of your dumbass. Why do you lie in your profile? What's it like wanting to be something you have no chance in hell ever being??
Posted on 12/15/09 at 1:42 pm to MightyYat
quote:I didn't check until just now.
Why do you lie in your profile?
quote:
Psychologic Engineer (NASA)
Posted on 12/15/09 at 1:51 pm to Roaad
I swear. Its like jj had sex with his girl. He actually called jj a running back playing qb. I just don't understand the hate for a qb that put up matt flynn numbers.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 1:55 pm to Roaad
quote:
Psychologic Engineer (NASA)
The best part is it's not even the proper fricking term for that position. Not to mention he can't even master your/you're. He's quite entertaining.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:03 pm to MightyYat
I just Googled it.
No such thing as either a Psychological or Psychologic Engineer at NASA.
In fact, the terms psychologic and/or psychological do not appear next to each other on the NASA website.
And if you think about it, it is a patently absurd profession.
Engineering behaviors and personalities?
No such thing as either a Psychological or Psychologic Engineer at NASA.
In fact, the terms psychologic and/or psychological do not appear next to each other on the NASA website.
And if you think about it, it is a patently absurd profession.
Engineering behaviors and personalities?
This post was edited on 12/15/09 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:07 pm to Roaad
They should find a way to factor in 'sacks when he had ample time to throw it away' into efficiency rating.
JJ's completion percentage would have been around 57% if he had thrown the ball away throughout the year instead of taking some of the sacks which were preventable.
JJ's completion percentage would have been around 57% if he had thrown the ball away throughout the year instead of taking some of the sacks which were preventable.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:10 pm to MightyYat
read the fricking thread moron!!! god damn your an idiot!!!
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:11 pm to Roaad
quote:
I just Googled it.
No such thing as either a Psychological or Psychologic Engineer at NASA.
In fact, the terms psychologic and/or psychological do not appear next to each other on the NASA website.
And if you think about it, it is a patently absurd profession.
Engineering behaviors and personalities?
Engineering Psychology is a relatively new term in the field. It's glorified ergonomics.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:12 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Tigerfan5555
i don't know what's more funny about this guy the Bullshite he says about LSU's Qbs or claiming to work for NASA and still being so stupid
This post was edited on 12/15/09 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:13 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
read the fricking thread moron!!! god damn your an idiot!!!
I swear to Christ you better be fricking with me. Otherwise, YOU'RE the dumbest person alive. I'm pretty sure you haven't gotten it right once.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:15 pm to Blutarsky
quote:Throw it away like Lee did? JJ has room to grow, sure, but to say the kid wasn't good this year is to ignore reality. Kid made mistakes that are typical of a first year starter. No more, no less.
They should find a way to factor in 'sacks when he had ample time to throw it away' into efficiency rating.
JJ's completion percentage would have been around 57% if he had thrown the ball away throughout the year instead of taking some of the sacks which were preventable.
Kid also showed flashes of brilliance. Kid just needs to develop under a decent coach, which we do not have. A decently coached OL might help. You had people bitching about him stepping into a pocket that didn't exist most of the season. Our interior line operated more like a turnstile, than a roadblock.
I think there is a significant portion of the fanbase that is pushing too much of the blame on the kids shoulders, when he did not LOSE us a single game. There weren't many that he won, but he never lost one for us.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:16 pm to MightyYat
quote:In terms of the english language is drastically different from pychologic(al) engineering.
Engineering Psychology
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:18 pm to Blutarsky
quote:
JJ's completion percentage would have been around 57% if he had thrown the ball away throughout the year instead of taking some of the sacks which were preventable.
The JJ suck-off racist would have you believe he was Jesus...Anytime someone points to something he does wrong, idiots like PRIDGENTIGER, MightyYat and the other tweedle dicks throw racism and "he's got the same #'s as matt flynn" at you..
This post was edited on 12/15/09 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:19 pm to Roaad
quote:
Engineering Psychology
whatever floats your boat...
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:24 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
The JJ suck-off racist would have you believe he was Jesus...Anytime someone points to something he does wrong, idiots like PRIDGENTIGER, MightyYat and the other tweedle dicks throw racism and "he's got the same #'s as matt flynn" at you..
Who the frick brought up race? That's right, YOU did dumbass.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:24 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
whatever floats your boat...
You're a liar homey. 
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:31 pm to Roaad
"JJ for being inexperienced"
In reading these types of threads, I am really getting a fresh admiration for how good Tommy Hodson was.
In reading these types of threads, I am really getting a fresh admiration for how good Tommy Hodson was.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 2:58 pm to FourZero
quote:Tommy Hodson was a great one.
n reading these types of threads, I am really getting a fresh admiration for how good Tommy Hodson was.
Posted on 12/15/09 at 3:37 pm to AGENT225
quote:
The following QB's had worse Efficiency ratings than JJ
Jordan Jefferson SO 11 games 169-272 62.13% 1964yds 16td 6int
avg: 178yds 1.45 td .54 in
Greg McElroy JR 13 games 192-314 61.15% 2450yds 17td 4int
avg: 188.5yds 1.3td .3 int
If you don't think there are a myriad of factors at play and not just QB play, let's hear it.
I think this post proves exactly the point the original poster was trying to make. The difference between the two is that McElroy had a solid OL in front of him and a running game to go with it. You can also probably throw in the fact that Alabama was much more efficient in getting plays into the huddle and snapped without delay of game penalties or having to call timeouts. So those 3 factors IMO contributed to the different offensive rankings for both teams.
It should be noted, however, that JJ was much better than McElroy in the red zone. Not sure what caused Alabama's funk in the red zone but they had a really rough time once they got there.
Page 11 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News