- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The 3 main reasons LSU Football 2018 gets no Pre-Season Love
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:20 am to TigerCliff777
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:20 am to TigerCliff777
Troy
1
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:39 am to TigerCliff777
Agreed. But the main reason is Coach O.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:49 am to Chimlim
quote:
Agreed. But the main reason is Coach O
that was #1 on the list and should be
Ed fell from heaven and landed on a golden spoon
It is up to him to prove his worth - no one else
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:50 am to the_watcher
There is no embarrassing myself. Lsu is likely an upgrade at every single position group other than rb. I know your agenda, and don't want this to be true, but we had several players that started several games that were an upgrade over the "assumed" starter.
We also have transfers, one of which ARANDA says may be the best lineman, and one of the others is on watch awards as a wr. The media makes it out as lsu being highly inexperienced, and that just isn't the case. But hey, we know what the "watcher" has predicted and wants to see happen...and a good team wouldn't go well with that agenda. Dude.
We also have transfers, one of which ARANDA says may be the best lineman, and one of the others is on watch awards as a wr. The media makes it out as lsu being highly inexperienced, and that just isn't the case. But hey, we know what the "watcher" has predicted and wants to see happen...and a good team wouldn't go well with that agenda. Dude.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:54 am to beauxroux
quote:
He seems more at ease this off-season. Hopefully that translates to on-field success. Miami is huge game in terms of seeing if team plays up to potential.
As usual, I couldn't agree more with your take. I think where I would be concerned is if they lose to Miami and the QB throws 3 or 4 picks in the first two games and the offense looks sloppy, do they come out conservative against Auburn like last year? Or do they stay the course? How long is the leash for the starting QB in that scenario?
I hope it doesn't come to that, but I wonder if they panic or not and try to change things up too much as they did in the Troy game last year. There's no shortness of intrigue going into the first quarter of the season this year.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 7:59 am to TigerLunatik
Says one of the biggest trolls on this board.
Yeah, I'm way off base saying the media is all over lsu being green with only 10 returning starters. You can spin it any way you want, but lsu has at least 8 on defense alone...and that doesn't count a few that actually started a couple games last year. There is a huge difference between a team returning 10 starters and inexperienced guys behind them. That isn't what lsu is, at all. But, that is the narrative out there.
I know, that thought process is way over your head. Just a keyboard troll on here. Have a good day, I'm out now to enjoy mine.
Yeah, I'm way off base saying the media is all over lsu being green with only 10 returning starters. You can spin it any way you want, but lsu has at least 8 on defense alone...and that doesn't count a few that actually started a couple games last year. There is a huge difference between a team returning 10 starters and inexperienced guys behind them. That isn't what lsu is, at all. But, that is the narrative out there.
I know, that thought process is way over your head. Just a keyboard troll on here. Have a good day, I'm out now to enjoy mine.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:05 am to Pensacolatgr
quote:
I know your agenda, and don't want this to be true, but we had several players that started several games that were an upgrade over the "assumed" starter.
Of our 22 full time starters last year, 10 of them will be returning this year. I’m not sorry that fact hurts your feelings
quote:
The media makes it out as lsu being highly inexperienced, and that just isn't the case
Yes it is. This isn’t an opinion.
quote:
But hey, we know what the "watcher" has predicted and wants to see happen...and a good team wouldn't go well with that agenda.
I haven’t predicted anything except that you will continue to not comprehend what a returning starter is
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:10 am to Pensacolatgr
quote:
Says one of the biggest trolls on this board.
Good luck with that clown. You are by far the worst poster on the board and no one takes you seriously. Try using that alleged MBA to get a fricking clue or some self awareness. Everyone can see that you are either an alter or the most pathetically insecure person ever. Who comes into a new place and immediately throws out their education? Or that they're in shape and have big balls? You continually embarrass yourself everyday, jackass.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:13 am to Pensacolatgr
quote:
Lsu is likely an upgrade at every single position group other than rb
I think what you're referring to is the media saying were 120th in returning offensive production. And they can't count Giles because he played at tech. That's not agenda.
And because we believe every position are upgrades doesnt mean anything. Were LSU fans. It's not hard to see why the media and outside LSU people are down on LSU there are a lot of unknowns.
And regarding returning starters being 10, and you stating we have 8 on defense...Devin White, Rashard Lawrence, Delpit, greedy, and Battle are returning STARTERS...everyone else you claim is not a returning starter but a key contributor.
Doesnt mean they wont be an upgrade but you cant lump them into starters if they started a game. They didn't start the majority of the games so they can't be classified as a returning starter.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:16 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
I hope it doesn't come to that, but I wonder if they panic or not and try to change things up too much as they did in the Troy game last year.
Panic last year derived from O's lack of trust and confidence in Canada's system. So, I don't expect wholesale changes in offense regardless of Miami result. But like you, I hope the disaster scenario you painted does not come to pass.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:20 am to beauxroux
quote:
Panic last year derived from O's lack of trust and confidence in Canada's system.
I agree as well. I think that's why we see more of the interim "pedal to the metal" coach we got in '16 and less of the conservative guy we got last year. I hope it results in more production and wins.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:23 am to IM_4_LSU
So Ed Alexander and chiasson aren't starters? Fehako? Yeah ok. That doesn't even include some of the others that started games.
I assume malone is considered lt starter.
Lsu is fine. But, I realize where I am and who the posters in this thread are, for the most part.
I assume malone is considered lt starter.
Lsu is fine. But, I realize where I am and who the posters in this thread are, for the most part.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:27 am to Pensacolatgr
quote:
Fehako?
Fehako has literally never played a down for LSU. How in the frick can he be a returning starter? I don’t believe you are real
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:28 am to TigerLunatik
You have a poster in this very thread that openly hopes lsu loses every game, and you say you don't disagree with his thought process. You are nothing but a POS troll that tries to play both sides but always fall back to your hater roots.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:28 am to the_watcher
The only person I've seen that is THAT incapable of following a conversation is Space Cowboy. That has to be him. I refuse to believe two people in this world are that dumb.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:30 am to the_watcher
You are fkn stupid. You'll be on suicide watch when lsu is kicking arse.
Fehako is a proven p5 starter that aranda himself says is unblockable...but yeah...roll with your inexperience card. I assume you think Malone and key were the men last year too.
Fehako is a proven p5 starter that aranda himself says is unblockable...but yeah...roll with your inexperience card. I assume you think Malone and key were the men last year too.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:30 am to Pensacolatgr
quote:
You have a poster in this very thread that openly hopes lsu loses every game, and you say you don't disagree with his thought process.
No matter how many times you repeat this it will never be true. As I've told you 100 times it seems, I agreed with him about ONE thing and vehemently disagreed with him about hoping LSU loses. Try again clownboy.
Eta: I actually have agreed with you and Ree more than Rouge. Dumbass.
This post was edited on 7/24/18 at 8:34 am
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:33 am to Pensacolatgr
quote:
So Ed Alexander and chiasson aren't starters? Fehako? Yeah ok. That doesn't even include some of the others that started games.
They are starters this year, Ed was behind Gilmore
Chaisson* was behind Key
Fehoko* wasnt allowed to play
So they cant be classified as returning starters.
Dude I believe we will have a top defense. I'm not hating but you can't classify someone as a starter when they didn't start or started a couple games when the others were out.
They were key contributors. That doesnt mean they arent upgrades but you can't just call them a returning starter because you believe they're better.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 8:36 am to TigerCliff777
I would add a 4th reason
4. AD JA has proven he knows little to nothing about football
4. AD JA has proven he knows little to nothing about football
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News