- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we were dominated in 2008. big difference
you said it yourself many of times, this defense has been dominated by mediocre offenses all year...why was this game any different?
Lsu's offense played down to its opponent and its defense did play down slightly more then it normally does.
considering the year this team has had, i fail to see any big difference.
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
2004 LSU, as a program, was not established like 2008 LSU is.
2003 National Championship???
The ignorance on the board never fails to entertain me
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:39 am to tigerskin
The fun thing about arguing over entirely subjective definitions is that no one can ever tell you conclusively that you're wrong
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we were dominated in 2008. big difference
We were domind in the first half and then we dominated in the Second
BIg difference
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:40 am to Ice Cold
this thread isn't meant to blow saban, he could have recruited better and had 2004 in a better position, but the fact remains that 2004 is not close to as talented as this 2008 team.
anybody who'd take the 2004 LSU tigers over the 2008 tigers based on pure talent is just lying to themselves
2004 was handled exactly once (UGA). 2008 has been handled 2.75 times). and 2004 LSU had the AU game, which is comparable (but better) than the 2008 Bama game. 2004 LSU > 2008 LSU, and there realy isn't an excuse for that, but the seasons aren't fully comparable
anybody who'd take the 2004 LSU tigers over the 2008 tigers based on pure talent is just lying to themselves
2004 was handled exactly once (UGA). 2008 has been handled 2.75 times). and 2004 LSU had the AU game, which is comparable (but better) than the 2008 Bama game. 2004 LSU > 2008 LSU, and there realy isn't an excuse for that, but the seasons aren't fully comparable
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:41 am to Jason9782003
quote:
2003 National Championship???
The ignorance on the board never fails to entertain me
dude, we lost 3 juniors and a bunch of seniors and it hurt b/c we didn't have the depth that we do now
hell we didn't even lose any juniors after last year. that's b/c we're DEEP
2004 = rebuilding year
2008 = not a rebuilding year
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:42 am to bayourant
quote:
We were domind in the first half and then we dominated in the Second
we were dominated for 3 quarters. 75% of the game
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
2008 does have that depth
Please list the QB depth chart for us -
thanx in advance
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
You usually make some decent points - not one of your best efforts here.
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:45 am to WampusCat56
quote:
Please list the QB depth chart for us -
QB is 1 of 22 positions on the field, not counting special teams
and we had to rely on a RS Frosh a good bit in 2004
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:45 am to blueridgeTiger
quote:
not one of your best efforts here.
oh so you'd take 2004 LSU over 2008 LSU in a talent competition?
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:45 am to EmperorGout
Our linebackers aren't even average and when we start Favorite and Alexander at DL, the DL is mediocre at best.
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we were dominated in 2008. big difference
We did win the game and had a 30 point quarter. I wish I could have watched the game to know what happened better myself, but no matter what we weren't dominated.
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:46 am to tigerskin
quote:
Our linebackers aren't even average
they weren't good in 2004 either
LSU rarely has good LBs. we had average LBs in 2003 and 2007
quote:
and when we start Favorite and Alexander at DL, the DL is mediocre at best.
we still have RJF, who would have been the best DL in 2004, and ton of great DEs
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:47 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
but no matter what we weren't dominated.
dude the yardage at half was like 250 to 60 or something
the first down count, i believe, was 13 to 1
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
QB is not the issue right now. The offense has been able to put up plenty of points when it has to.
There is no reason LSU should have been in that position last night. Coaches aren't doing enough to prepare the team or don't know what they're doing.
There is no reason LSU should have been in that position last night. Coaches aren't doing enough to prepare the team or don't know what they're doing.
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You can nitpick the talent on the two teams (this team also has lots of holes/inexperience at key spots), but your basic premise, that Saban was still building in 2004, is pretty weak.
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:49 am to tigerskin
quote:
QB is the most critical position on the field
Fixed.
Posted on 11/16/08 at 10:49 am to MegaTiger
our sometimes bad, sometimes good offense wouldn't be as big of a deal if our D could stop troy last night
the only thing that stopped troy was dropped passes, the occasional pick, and non-calls by refs
the only thing that stopped troy was dropped passes, the occasional pick, and non-calls by refs
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News