Started By
Message

re: Stingley is special

Posted on 9/8/19 at 3:09 am to
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16370 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 3:09 am to
Dude you literally just proved me point

PP was taller and heavier than a Stingley was at this age. And I’m sorry but I don’t believe any 40 time a high schooler runs. A 40 isn’t official until its at the combine or pro day. At the combine, Peterson was 6’1 222lbs and ran an official 4.34 40. Do you ever see Stingley being 220lbs + ? I don’t. That’s all I meant. Peterson’s frame and size and athleticism is absurd. He’s still 1 of the biggest CBs in the NFL.

And again, Peterson is arguably the most physically gifted CB football has ever seen. To say Stingley isn’t on that level isn’t a knock. He’s still a physical freak and might be a better pure CB than PP.

Regardless, this is a great fricking debate we got here. We’re so spoiled af DB it’s ridiculous
Posted by Cd104444
Member since Aug 2019
1084 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 3:14 am to
He wasn’t 222 as a freshmen tho stingley weighed 5 pds less than Peterson did as a freshmen
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16370 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 3:18 am to
So PP was bigger as a freshman... like I said.

And do you ever see Stingley weighing 220lbs+ like PP did or having the frame for it? Me neither.

That’s literally all I’m saying. PPs size and athleticism is unheard of even for NFL standards. And I’m also saying that Stingley might be a better pure CB than PP as well.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16036 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 3:53 am to
PP7 wasnt 220+ lbs as a freshman. He probably has never been 220 lbs in his entire football career. Youre telling a fishing story
Posted by LSU_30A
Member since Jan 2019
2921 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 4:27 am to
Stingley and PP were and are both physical freaks so it’s pointless trying to decide which guy is more freakish than the other. I would say the major difference between the two are PP came in as a freshman relying on his speed and instincts to get by on whereas Stingley is far far far more technically sound. The kid has the technique of a 10 year NFL veteran. Don’t be surprised if they put the longer Stingley on each team’s top WR from here on out. It’s not a knock on Fulton either, this kid is just a once in a generation type player.
Posted by Voodoo_Tiger
Texas
Member since Mar 2018
120 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 4:28 am to
Stingley is a first rounder.

Your guy isn’t as good as you think he is.
Posted by canyon
MM23
Member since Dec 2003
21597 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 5:18 am to

Next time people ask, keep your mouth shut.
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11243 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 5:26 am to
Safe to say Stingleys career is off to a resounding success when were bickering about him vs PP7.
Posted by 314stunna
NYC
Member since Aug 2015
953 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 5:32 am to
Kary has frankly never impressed me. He seems like an athlete playing football more than a football player.

Sting is that dude.
Posted by RuddyP89
Member since Jul 2019
146 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:42 am to
Idk why he hasn't impressed you. I'm impressed.. I just thought he had a bad game. Don't be that guy whenever one person has a bad game you gotta say "oh he was never good in the first place". Not a good look
Posted by JakeFromStateFarm
*wears khakis
Member since Jun 2012
12980 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 7:07 am to
PP7 was only about 195 his freshman year.

quote:

He probably has never been 220 lbs in his entire football career

Yeah, about that...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram