- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spencer Ware not in the same class as Trent Richardson
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:10 pm to Cameron Cooke
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:10 pm to Cameron Cooke
quote:
Ware is getting a whooollllle lot less carries. Not to mention Bama throws the ball hardly never.
I'm going to suggest you do some research.
Trent 115 carries
Ware 105
Alabama passing plays 175
LSU passing plays 133
Homework Assignment
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:12 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
And Ware is not the main RB every series besides, he would have more TDs if we give him all the goal line carries.
I've tried to steer you in the right direction, but you don't want to listen.
Do you realize Bama's 2nd string RB, Eddie Lacy, has more yards per game, more yards per carry (by a mile), and the same number of TD's as Ware?
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:13 pm to Cameron Cooke
quote:
Just saying....who has Bama played with such a stout defense
who has lsu played w/ a stout defense? seriously, just saying.
oregon? no
state? debatable
florida? prob but bama also played them already
nw state? hell no
wvu? no
kentucky? god no
sorry but that argument can't be used here as the defenses we've played aren't exactly stellar either.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:14 pm to Teague
Again I ask....who have y'all played?
Not one of those teams is putting up any kind of defensive numbers.
Not one of those teams is putting up any kind of defensive numbers.
This post was edited on 10/10/11 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:16 pm to Teague
Honestly if LSU passed more it would allow Ware some longer gains. we run against 8 and 9 man fronts all the time when we know and they know not only that we are running, but what play we are running. We still get 3-4 yards. its an "F-You, you can't stop us" ploy by miles. Its the heart of what we are as a team.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:16 pm to Cameron Cooke
quote:
Again I ask....WHO THE HELL HAVE Y'ALL PLAYED?
Not one of those teams is putting up any kind of defensive numbers.
who has lsu played with a good defense? we've played teams known for good offense, but state is the only team that is supposed to be good defensively, and they're showing every week that they're still mississippi st and not a school on the rise.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:17 pm to Teague
yea and had ware not been pulled from the kentucky game for an injury ware would prob have more
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:18 pm to Teague
Do you realize Ware has been taken out of games due to mop up duty by our other backs? How many RBs does Bama play? LSU plays a crap load. Ware gets the meaningful snaps in the game, not the easy runs against tired defenses in the 4th quarter. Eddie Lacy decided to go to Bama because we are loaded in the backfield for years to come.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:19 pm to Cameron Cooke
quote:
Again I ask....who have y'all played?
I'd say we've played DEFENSES that are every bit as good or better than LSU has played.
Look, I'm impressed by Ware. The guy is very good. But you keep throwing false claims out there that are hard for an argumentative person like myself to let slide.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:20 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
Eddie Lacy decided to go to Bama because we are loaded in the backfield for years to come.
False again. Eddie Lacy came to Bama because Les didn't offer him until late due to grades.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:21 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
everyone keeps ignoring the stats being shown and then reiterating the same ignorant point that TR gets a lot more touches than Ware. Ware has 10 less rushes on the year than TR, yet somehow TR has about 300 more yards and 5 more TDs. Sometimes I feel like posters on here can't be any bigger homers, and they never cease to amaze me with uncreative spinning of facts so they can convince themselves of a fallacy. Ware is a very good running back, but that doesn't mean that he is going to be better than or as good as the best back in the country.
This post was edited on 10/10/11 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:23 pm to Teague
Ya I thought it was funny because I watched Lacy play in high school, and he was a great back, but not the brightest crayon in the box when you talked to him. Evidentally Bama isn't to concerned with academics though. 

Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:25 pm to Cameron Cooke
quote:
Evidentally Bama isn't to concerned with academics though.
Just say, "you were right, and I was wrong". You don't have to try to change the subject. Les offered him too.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:33 pm to Teague
quote:
False again. Eddie Lacy came to Bama because Les didn't offer him until late due to grades.
Actually, he could of came to LSU and still qualified like he did in Bama. Lacy decided to go the Bama route to not share carries as much.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:35 pm to Teague
The fact is, TR is a better back (best back in the nation IMO). Another fact, Ware IS in the same class as TR. The gap between the 2 isn't that far, if there even is a gap.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:37 pm to Teague
Who cares...we stop the run and let the best secondary in the country dare them to pass. TR is better at this point in his career. He goes down...y'all are probably screwed. We have several to step up. QB might be the difference in this game.



Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:38 pm to MStant1
quote:
LSU RB's seem to almost always be underrated IMO.
Case in point: Ridley pushing to be the Patriots feature back while Ingram is a situational player with the Saints.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:39 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Good God, how much can you misinterpret simple facts? Ingram has more carries and TD than Sproles and Thomas combined. Ridley had one decent game, then one good game, then got moved back to returning kicks while the Patriots' starter absolutely exploded last week.
Case in point: Ridley pushing to be the Patriots feature back while Ingram is a situational player with the Saints.
This post was edited on 10/10/11 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:43 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
Lacy decided to go the Bama route to not share carries as much.
We had Mark Ingram and signed the Richardson, the #1 recruit in the nation, and you think he came to Bama because he could get more carries?

I think I'm going to bow out on this. You have fun with your spin game. And for the record, Ware is a great back.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 4:44 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Case in point: Ridley pushing to be the Patriots feature back while Ingram is a situational player with the Saints.
lol, ridley is not pushing to be the starter. he is pushing to remain the backup when woodhead comes back. where the hell do some of y'all come up with this stuff. btw, ridley has less yards and carries than ingram this year
Back to top
