Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Should NIL be incentive based?

Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:39 pm
Posted by King of New Orleans
In front of The Hungry Tiger
Member since Jul 2011
11205 posts
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:39 pm
The ROI isn’t what it should be for a lot of guys year in and year out.

Pay a guy whatever you want this year but it’s not gauranteed next year. You may get less if you don’t meet expectations. You may get more if you exceed them.

Also, if you realize you aren’t getting paid as much because you didn’t meet expectations and you decide to transfer, there needs to be clauses in place.

The free for all needs to stop. It’s not working.
Posted by forever lsu30
Member since Nov 2005
4055 posts
Posted on 10/11/26 at 4:13 pm to
The free wheeling open checkbooks have been a problem from the start because they didn't include any parameters or pay schedules on the money. No clauses for failure to appear at promotional events or even the social media influence posts, not to mention performance.

Fumbles, INTs, drop passes, missed tackles, etc. should have all been baked into these "contracts" from the jump. Donors just blindly gave the money away & it snowballed into the S show we have to endure.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4501 posts
Posted on 10/11/26 at 4:28 pm to
It should be, but until that becomes standard, it will just be negative recruited by competitors.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram