- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Jefferson be getting more reps at practice?
Posted on 3/24/09 at 1:45 pm to CalLSU
Posted on 3/24/09 at 1:45 pm to CalLSU
quote:
you're right its just aggravating having to read nonsense.
I just think it's funny at this point.
I like king joey's posts, because at least he has a point most of the time, and backs it up with reasoning for the most part.
tojo...well... should probably not post so much.
he HAS to be related to jarrett lee.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 1:50 pm to tojo
quote:
What aqbout your nonsense, that is always the same story,if some one disagrees with yall, its nonsense. Your opinion is the only one that counts.
My nonsense? What nonsense? All i am stating are facts. JL did throw pick 6's. And he also led us in some pretty impressive victories. How is that nonsense? Maybe you have been playing NCAA09 and have confused your JL in that game to the real life version. I am a little confused as to what nonsense i have been saying, please help me to see from your viewpoint. And fwiw, i don't think that people who say JL should start are speaking nonsense, all i am saying is that i would like some proof behind that argument and not just speculation. If they have solid proof that he will in fact be the better quarterback then fine, let him play, as long as we win, as doc said earlier, i don't care if the real mike the tiger gets out there and is qb, a wins a win in my book
Posted on 3/24/09 at 1:57 pm to tojo
quote:
We will have more than that, running out of bounds will not do it either. protecting the ball is good, but you have to score too.
WTF? he ran out of bounds after getting all he could and usually a 1st down. Do you seriously want the QB taking hits down field? We scored plenty in the games he started, and he didn't make many mistakes WHICH IS HUGE FOR A TRUE FRESHMAN
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:01 pm to CalLSU
It doesn't have to be polarized. Lee, had some great throws and great moments during the year. That's probably the reason they stuck with him so long.
I think what it really comes down to for me, and I was behind Lee all the way (still am), is that JJ is more involved in the game. Lee never knew when to run or never tried to make anything positive out of it when he did. JJ threw blocks, threw shite with his left hand, ran for positive yds.
That is a must in college football, we don't win either NC without Mauck and Flynn running when the game dictated it.
I think what it really comes down to for me, and I was behind Lee all the way (still am), is that JJ is more involved in the game. Lee never knew when to run or never tried to make anything positive out of it when he did. JJ threw blocks, threw shite with his left hand, ran for positive yds.
That is a must in college football, we don't win either NC without Mauck and Flynn running when the game dictated it.
This post was edited on 3/24/09 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:05 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
in fact, he hasn't scored any points for the other team or helped the other team score any points.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:09 pm to LSU Patrick
That's the easy way out. Seriously, how many of those were true pick 6's?
I'm saying JJ is the guy but if you're using the int's for TD's as your arguement you don't have an original thought.
I'm saying JJ is the guy but if you're using the int's for TD's as your arguement you don't have an original thought.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:13 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
It doesn't have to be polarized. Lee, had some great throws and great moments during the year. That's probably the reason they stuck with him so long.
I think what it really comes down to for me, and I was behind Lee all the way (still am), is that JJ is more involved in the game. Lee never knew when to run or never tried to make anything positive out of it when he did. JJ threw blocks, threw shite with his left hand, ran for positive yds.
That is a must in college football, we don't win either NC without Mauck and Flynn running when the game dictated it.
this is one of the best posts about JT and JJ that i have seen. This is exactly what i think, JJ seems, and i know its only been 2 games, like he just knows the game and what he needs to do. And i would agree with you about mauck and flynn, there are times in games when throwing the ball isn't as good as running, and those are usually key moments in games, we need someone that will be able to make those plays for us if we are going to hang another NC banner up
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:16 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
WTF? he ran out of bounds after getting all he could and usually a 1st down. Do you seriously want the QB taking hits down field? We scored plenty in the games he started, and he didn't make many mistakes WHICH IS HUGE FOR A TRUE FRESHMAN
+1
great post!
tojo is mentally retarded.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:17 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
I think what it really comes down to for me, and I was behind Lee all the way (still am), is that JJ is more involved in the game. Lee never knew when to run or never tried to make anything positive out of it when he did. JJ threw blocks, threw shite with his left hand, ran for positive yds.
That is a must in college football, we don't win either NC without Mauck and Flynn running when the game dictated it.
+1000000000
JJ is a GAMER, and he showed it in the limited time he had.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:20 pm to TheDoc
You bunch of gingers still crying over Jarret Lee?
Doc, I love the avatar.
Doc, I love the avatar.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:20 pm to TheDoc
quote:
JJ is a GAMER, and he showed it in the limited time he had.
I'm counting on it. Kinda silly for a 41 yr old making 6 figures has his hopes riding on a guy that has two starts lol
This post was edited on 3/24/09 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:28 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
Doc, I love the avatar.
thanks
some of the posters on here are hilarious
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:30 pm to CalLSU
quote:
I'm saying JJ is the guy but if you're using the int's for TD's as your arguement you don't have an original thought.
What? Do you want me to make something up so that it can original? Who here wasn't frustrated as hell last season with all of the pick 6s? That was the most frustrating thing I've watched in all my years of following sports.
How is it "original" to say:
1) Lee could end up being the starter
2) Lee has talent but was thrown into a tough situation
3) Jefferson only played 2 1/2 games?
4) Just because Jefferson looked better in the bowl game doesn't mean...
Nothing said in here is original. It's all opinion and observation, similar to what coaches use to make decisions. Of course, the coaches have more data to work with than anyone in here. If you want original, start making a case for Ruben Randle to be the starter at QB for 2009.
Obviously, there is a chance that Lee could start. Hell, there's a chance that Garrett could start.
If Lee improves AND demonstrates that on the field in a number of situations, GREAT! I hope he does. I will trust the coaches to make the right decision. However, I would be absolutley shocked if they decide that the way to go is to make Lee the starter before the season begins. Most likely, Lee will play 1-2 (depending on how the game is going) quarters in the first few games. If Jefferson struggles, and Lee plays awesome, Lee might win the job by the middle of the season. If both Qbs play well, they will probably split time much of the season.
Sorry not original, but sometimes reality dictates the the value of originality.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:36 pm to LSU Patrick
Ok, original may not be the best word for the situation. I'm saying the int's yes but the result no.
There were several, I'll say half for sake of argument, that were true TD's but others were like a keystone cops scene.
It doesn't matter, I was saying, againn, im behind JJ for what he showed, but Lee's pick 6's shouldn't be the reason to throw him away or to support JJ as the starter. I don't think it shows football IQ, IMO
There were several, I'll say half for sake of argument, that were true TD's but others were like a keystone cops scene.
It doesn't matter, I was saying, againn, im behind JJ for what he showed, but Lee's pick 6's shouldn't be the reason to throw him away or to support JJ as the starter. I don't think it shows football IQ, IMO
Posted on 3/24/09 at 2:48 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
It doesn't matter, I was saying, againn, im behind JJ for what he showed, but Lee's pick 6's shouldn't be the reason to throw him away or to support JJ as the starter.
Although some may have thrown Lee out the window, I sure haven't. I really hope the guy finds a way to limit the big mistakes and maximize his skills. I won't be disappointed by any means if he earns the starter role. I wouldn't care if Chad Jones or Ciron Black were suiting up as the starting QB if that meant success for LSU football. However, Jefferson LOOKS to be the better of the two at this point. Just as with all LSU players, I will hope the best for Jarett, but I will want the best gameday performer out there in the big games.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 4:05 pm to tojo
quote:
Sure he is my brother,arent we all. Even you.
no, I'm not from west virginia.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 5:12 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
Kinda silly for a 41 yr old making 6 figures
lol at that
Posted on 3/24/09 at 5:24 pm to Maximus
THIS THREAD IS IRELEVENT.
JJ WILL BE OUR STARTER THE WHOLE SEASON BARRING INJURY.
JJ WILL BE OUR STARTER THE WHOLE SEASON BARRING INJURY.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 5:55 pm to CalLSU
quote:
Your boyfriend only scored 30 2 times, and one of those teams was mississippi state, they lost against louisiana tech.
Posted on 3/24/09 at 6:04 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
That is a must in college football, we don't win either NC without Mauck and Flynn running when the game dictated it.
First point, not necessarily (USC/Miami);
Second point, absolutely correct. In our offense, you have to be able to make plays at QB running the ball when the opportunity is there or the defense dictates it.
Popular
Back to top


1




