- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC runner up should always get Sugar
Posted on 12/6/22 at 4:08 am to LouisianaLonghorn
Posted on 12/6/22 at 4:08 am to LouisianaLonghorn
quote:You snooze against 5$7, you lose.
We shite the bed. We deserve what we got.
You got the "Can't spell Citrus without UT" Bowl at 1pm on a Monday work day against an unranked team.

Would much rather the Gator Bowl at 3:30 against Notre Dame in Jacksonville..........
This post was edited on 12/6/22 at 4:25 am
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:24 am to ForeverEllisHugh
Definitely agree… With the 12 team format, does the Sugar Bowl forever become a semifinal AND final venue?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:48 am to Timeoday
Makes no sense; troll poster
Posted on 12/6/22 at 9:42 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
quote:
Was Purdue the runner up in the Big 10?
quote:come on, man. Michigan and Ohio State were CLEARLY the top 2 teams in the Big Ten.
They were. Same thing.
Now yes, I understand your argument that Purdue won their division and played in the CCG, but that doesn't make them the "runner up" in my mind. It was just a consequence of the division splits this year.
Big Ten has 2 teams in the playoff, and Penn State got picked for the Rose Bowl.
So if you want to argue a technicality about Purdue being the runner up and they go to the Rose Bowl, have at it.
But that's not the way it should be, at all.
Popular
Back to top
