Started By
Message

re: Scott or Faulk?

Posted on 10/1/08 at 9:53 pm to
Posted by siliconvalleytiger
Bay Area, CA
Member since Apr 2004
31326 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 9:53 pm to
Considering Faulk carried this team for a long time, I'd say Kevin Faulk.
Posted by ThePlumber
NOLA
Member since Jul 2005
970 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 9:54 pm to
He broke the record for most points in one season.
Posted by ThePlumber
NOLA
Member since Jul 2005
970 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Oh Yea who has a National Championship Ring (Scott or Faulk)

What the hell does this have to do with anything? Who has three Super Bowl rings?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
78321 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Wait for the season to end before you really choose though.


no

kevin faulk is #3 all time in the SEC in rushing yards and #1 in all purpose yards, by 1,000 yards
you can also make an argument that kevin faulk is the most important person in LSU football history, i attribute a lot of our success now to his commitment back in '95...he made it cool again for the top louisiana players to go to LSU

This post was edited on 10/1/08 at 10:53 pm
Posted by LSUshad
Member since Sep 2008
16155 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:11 pm to
Scott. He has less illegitimate kids causing off the field distractions.
Posted by UnoMe
Here
Member since Dec 2007
6801 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Who has three Super Bowl rings?


I think Faulk may have 3 Super Bowl playing as a backup or a third stringer I thought this was a LSU College football forum not N.F.L. Forum...forthermore people keep bring stats about all the records Faulk broke when he got the ball about 60%-70% of the time in his years at LSU. When Scott hasn't seen the ball as much. So I guess we will never know...
Posted by maburu2
Member since Mar 2008
4715 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:36 pm to

So Scott wasn't a 3rd stringer last year?
FWIW Faulk played with teams that had little talent compared to what Scott has.
Posted by ThePlumber
NOLA
Member since Jul 2005
970 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

I think Faulk may have 3 Super Bowl playing as a backup or a third stringer I thought this was a LSU College football forum not N.F.L. Forum

Wow. First of all, please mix in a comma or a period every now and then. Secondly, you are unwilling to give Faulk credit for any of his three Super Bowls, yet you are claiming the NC for Scott when he was fourth on the team in rushing yards?
Posted by BigTig14
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2007
17 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:44 pm to
I love Scott as a pure RB, but Faulk just brought too much to the table. He returned kicks, his vision was amazing, he was a natural leader that brought emotion to the team. Just too many qualities and too versatile to pass up. Have to go with Faulk.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40081 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:51 pm to
is this thread a joke? how could you POSSIBLY say charles scott.
Posted by LSUQ
Gonzales
Member since Feb 2007
440 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:56 pm to
In the age of free agency and salary caps it is a testament to Kevin that he was around for all of those rings. Ask Tom Brady who he wants guarding his blindside on third down.

In the age of Youtube this isn't really a discussion. I'm proud of Scott but the SEC has had numerous solid to above solid backs. . . Faulk is a legend, a stand out among stand outs.
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
11295 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:56 pm to
Faulk... Amazing...
Imagine what Faulk wold do in his prime in our current offense? It would be frigging unreal.
Posted by LSUQ
Gonzales
Member since Feb 2007
440 posts
Posted on 10/1/08 at 11:59 pm to
?

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/2/08 at 2:27 am to
Faulk would be a frontrunner and favorite to win the heisman with this team. Go back and watch the Houston game...

This thread is a joke.
Posted by charlottetiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2007
7965 posts
Posted on 10/2/08 at 6:37 am to
quote:

I love Scott, but if Faulk had this year's line he'd have run for thst and more, not to mention the receiving yardage he'd have picked up.


OMG are we really gonna play the "what if" games between a current player and one that played forever ago. BLAH,BLAH,BLAH...another reason I hate bye weeks.
Posted by ready4something
virginia beach
Member since Jul 2008
6541 posts
Posted on 10/2/08 at 7:15 am to
Scott, is good but you have to take faulk. Playing him in the playoffs made me realize his greatness. Taking nothing away from scott but they are different backs and bring different strengths.
Posted by maburu2
Member since Mar 2008
4715 posts
Posted on 10/2/08 at 8:57 am to
quote:

In the age of free agency and salary caps it is a testament to Kevin that he was around for all of those rings. Ask Tom Brady who he wants guarding his blindside on third down.

There was an ESPN analyst that said Faulk is STILL the best 3rd down back in the whole league, at the beginning of this season.
Posted by Towelie
America's Wang
Member since Aug 2007
19214 posts
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Scott or Faulk?


Seriously? Of all the stupid shite I've seen on this board, this is the most baffling.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram