re: Saban dominance good or bad for college football?

Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:24 pm to ApexTiger

Posted by earl keese

A Thousand Miles from Nowhere

Member since Jan 2014

7029 posts

Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:24 pm to ApexTiger

Bad. And it's gone on far too long.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Havoc

Member since Nov 2015

39285 posts

Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:26 pm to ApexTiger

I don’t mind any dominance resulting from fair recruiting and play. The consistently crooked refs is what burns me up.

And we know for a fact supported by evidence, that Saban’s dominance would not be nearly as strong without game changing bad calls favoring Bama in many games over the last several years.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Nissanmaxima

Member since Feb 2006

14928 posts

Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:45 pm to BROpaneTANK

quote:
Clemson/Ohio state are the model for perfect top programs. Usually favored, really good recruiting and coaching, but still beatable and surpassable. Bama has reached a point where you absolutely know the result, and even if the result isn’t what you thought, you still feel certain to a point where you don’t want to watch, and that’s the problem. Same with warriors, they may lose, but you’ve convinced yourself they’ll win until you see other wise and decide not to watch.

That's why it infuriates me that the NCAA doesn't have hound dogs all over him and that program. To sustain at the level in which Alabama does is damn near impossible to do now a days. Like you said look at all the other top programs, something is really really wrong with all that! Doesn't take a genius to figure that one out. But if the NCAA officials are getting their palms greased and one has to believe that something shady is going on, nothing will ever be done!