re: Ross Dellenger article

Mostly fair article. Couple issues I think that could have been written differently:

- Landry’s big issue highlighting the conflict of interest b/w SW and Kelly’s agent being one in the same and the implications of that on contracts. Wasn’t covered and is a significant part of the story from Landry’s position and not surprising why SW would not want that widely known & damaging to his side of the story.

- I would not have cited comments from agents. No shite they are going to try and portray this will adversely affect HC hire; they want to try and use that as leverage in negotiations. Clearly biased perspective.

- Cited staffer calling situation a “shite show”. How many staffers did he interview? More than one? Did they all perceive it that way? Others have a different opinion? Impressions inside the athletic department of positive/negative of Kelly and Woodward’s departure? I would have clarified that angle better for more accurate inside-the-building context.

Those issues for me made the article a bit more slanted than a “just the facts ma’am” synopsis.