- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Root Cause Investigation - O Line
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:58 pm to ramchallenge
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:58 pm to ramchallenge
quote:This guy gets it.
the center position is the key on the oline.
Fans get caught up in Blind Side narrative. If you want to feature a good ground game, build OL inside out in recruiting. Even pass pro suffers most from middle pressure. most routes.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:07 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
OL is heavily affected by playcalling. When your OC sucks and can’t call plays and be creative, you will get smashed.
The OL had its issues, but running game issues had more to do with how bad Sloan is at mixing up play calls, adjusting to what the defense gives him and simply not sucking.
In the end, as long as Sloan is calling the plays, the running game will be mediocre no matter the talent back there.
LSU has struggled to run the ball consistently for a long time, these issues far predate Sloan.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:10 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
A poster named jiminycricket (sp) did a detailed breakdown of a play vs Aggie. We had the #s and Chester only had to make an easy seal block, and Durham is off to the races. It was a perfect play call. But Chester whiffed and the play collapsed. It's hard for me to pin that on play-calling.
IDK how much of our woes across the season were on play calling. I do know it seemed we struggled in the RZ all season long.
Playcalling is probably 15-20% of what makes a successful unit, the other 80-85% is talent, execution, and chemistry.
Unfortunately, fans reverse that.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 7:18 am to DeathByTossDive225
Yet only successful runs looked like some sort of stretch play
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This statement is a mouthful. Too many inside, unproductive runs. Do what you're good at and what fits the skillset of your players. Jackson went for 20+ yards twice in one game on outside runs. They ran him inside where he doesn't have good vision and where OL isn't dominant, he basically got nothing. He did have a couple opportunities for big plays in games but his vision and decision making was terrible and it yielded basically nothing. Durham has the vision and patience, I truly think he would have done way better had he not had the toe injury.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This statement is a mouthful. Too many inside, unproductive runs. Do what you're good at and what fits the skillset of your players. Jackson went for 20+ yards twice in one game on outside runs. They ran him inside where he doesn't have good vision and where OL isn't dominant, he basically got nothing. He did have a couple opportunities for big plays in games but his vision and decision making was terrible and it yielded basically nothing. Durham has the vision and patience, I truly think he would have done way better had he not had the toe injury.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:38 am to QB
We couldn't get a yard versus USC when Dellinger was in.... personnel always matter, but that is where the rest has to make up for it.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:41 am to Tigerfan1274
Nuss in a poor thrower when rolling out... on the move. His accuracy suffers greatly. In fact, this is one of two things he really needs to work on before next year (IMO)... the other being willing to run to get that 1 - 2 yards and a first down about 3 times a game.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:28 am to TooSober
It’s not spelling only. They are actually different words.
Dominant describes something that is exceedingly superior in its class.
Dominate is the act of beating your competitors by large margins.
Dominant describes something that is exceedingly superior in its class.
Dominate is the act of beating your competitors by large margins.
Popular
Back to top

0




