- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rematches and "fairness"...rules of the BCS National Championship are laid out
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:11 pm to bmy
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:11 pm to bmy
quote:
What is your argument for Alabama getting in over a 1 loss Oregon?
particularly if they've beaten a highly ranked Stanford team and won their conf championship game...
0
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:14 pm to bmy
I don't know that the Gumps would be a "lock" for #2 vs a 1-loss oregon or 1-loss oklahoma, or even boise.
(And I really don't want to play them again)
I just want to let the system do it's job and if that's the situation decide by the rules who is No. 2.
(And I really don't want to play them again)
I just want to let the system do it's job and if that's the situation decide by the rules who is No. 2.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:27 pm to bmy
Maybe that Alabama is a better team and lost by less to LSU. I guess that would be my argument, it might be wrong. It isn't up to me though.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News