- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Reid Interception...looked like a completed pass
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:25 am
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:25 am
Great play by Reid, but I was at a bar and didn't hear the argument against the Bama guy coming down with it? I thought he had possession and had a knee down before the ball was stripped away. I thought the same thing on all the angles I saw.
Just wondering what the rationale was for it (it was reviewed so what exactly was said?) to be an Int. and not a completed pass.
Just wondering what the rationale was for it (it was reviewed so what exactly was said?) to be an Int. and not a completed pass.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 7:34 am

All Replies (76)
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:27 am to Buckeye06
Ball was clearly coming out as he hit the ground. Rule says the receiver has to control it all the way down....
ETA - guy two posts down from here makes a great point too - call was 'confirmed' by replay.
ETA - guy two posts down from here makes a great point too - call was 'confirmed' by replay.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 7:28 am
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:27 am to Buckeye06
The ball was moving when the receiver hit the ground.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:27 am to Buckeye06
the call was confirmed on replay (not just stands) so I feel good about it.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:28 am to jpbTiger
ok I can buy that I guess, but I thought at the best it was split possession when they hit the ground, and that would lead to a catch. I thought Reid grabbed it after both were on the ground?


Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:28 am to Buckeye06
quote:
I thought he had possession and had a knee down before the ball was stripped away.
guess you were too drunk by this point. it was 100% coming out of his hands before his shoulder hit the ground.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:28 am to Buckeye06
quote:
and had a knee down
he hit flat on his back. how in the hell would one say his knee was down first?
elbow maybe, but not close to having a knee down. try to fall flat on your back and put your knee down first. pretty hard to do.

Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:29 am to polizei11
quote:
The ball was moving when the receiver hit the ground.
I agree with this, but I'm glad the call on the field was INT. I don't think the replay official overturns the call on the field either way.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 7:30 am
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:30 am to Buckeye06
you can see the ball being pulled out on the way down, the tip of the ball was coming out of the Bama guys hand and when he hit the ground Reid was able to get total possession....LSU ball!! I could see how it could go either way but I'm glad it went the way it did. 

Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:30 am to tigerdup07
quote:
try to fall flat on your back and put your knee down first. pretty hard to do.

Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:31 am to blaine159
quote:
you can see the ball being pulled out on the way down, the tip of the ball was coming out of the Bama guys hand and when he hit the
and there was absolutely no way that the official saw that little ball movement while it was running live. however, i'm glad that his guess was an interception.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:31 am to TriumphTiger
quote:
I agree with this, but I'm glad the call on the field was INT. I don't think the replay official overrules the call on the field either way.
you could be right, but I doubt it.
the play did not STAND, it was CONFIRMED.
the receiver must maintain possession to the ground..not when the knee hits.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:32 am to Buckeye06
quote:
Buckeye06
I'm sure you can find it on youtube and watch it again....

Also, check out the actual rules on 'simultaneous catch'...
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:32 am to tigerdup07
quote:
elbow maybe, but not close to having a knee down. try to fall flat on your back and put your knee down first. pretty hard to do.

Ok I'm good with this; I may disagree but it was a great play regardless
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:33 am to tigerdup07
quote:
and there was absolutely no way that the official saw that little ball movement while it was running live. however, i'm glad that his guess was an interception.
Either way, the call was 'confirmed', as opposed to 'stands', which means there was conclusive video evidence for an interception. Call on the field wouldn't have mattered.....
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:35 am to Buckeye06
It was very clear and obvious that he did not have control of the ball, it was twisting out of his hands as he fell, Reid wanted the ball more, when they came up, Reid was in control of the ball, that is an int. it was a great def. play by a player that wanted the ball more than the receiver.. plain and simple, football 101
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:38 am to lake chuck fan
Buckeye, take a look at the picture a couple of posts above....if this isn't clear enough for you, nothing will be....
Posted on 11/7/11 at 7:39 am to Buckeye06
quote:
Regardless ball was horribly underthrown should never have happened
Eric Reid gets a helluva a lot of credit for recognizing what was happening as the play unfolded. Otherwise, that was a TD easily - bad pass or not.
Back to top
