
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Reading news outlets’ articles is very hard to do, these days.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:28 pm
To read an article of any kind is truly frustrating to where you cannot go a full three sentences without getting a break in the paragraph for an advertisement.
Then after scrolling for far too long, you realize you thought you passed more ads but they only placed one sentence of the article spaced by two more ads.
THEN you reach what you think is the end of the article and then hit with full page ads at the bottom, realizing you missed the “Read More” tab.
Tap the “Read more” tab correctly or the ads placed behind the tab will take you to the advertised website. Hit the back button to get back to anrticle and it takes you to front page of news outlet.
Then after scrolling for far too long, you realize you thought you passed more ads but they only placed one sentence of the article spaced by two more ads.
THEN you reach what you think is the end of the article and then hit with full page ads at the bottom, realizing you missed the “Read More” tab.
Tap the “Read more” tab correctly or the ads placed behind the tab will take you to the advertised website. Hit the back button to get back to anrticle and it takes you to front page of news outlet.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:36 pm to dstone12
I thought this was going to be about the shitty grammar by today's "journalists". WAFB articles are the absolute worst -- it feels like 8th graders write most of their articles.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:38 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
I thought this was going to be about the shitty grammar by today's "journalists". WAFB articles are the absolute worst -- it feels like 8th graders write most of their articles.
I’m not even worried about grammar that much.
It’s just that you don’t really know what the article is saying due to the ads taking up 3/4 of the page and the content taking. 1/4.
Here is a ln example.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:39 pm to dstone12
May I kindly suggest an adblocker or utilizing archive.is.
Brave browser does a pretty solid job of blocking ads on its own, too.
Brave browser does a pretty solid job of blocking ads on its own, too.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:39 pm to dstone12
Do you not want to pay money to The Advocate or the NY Times to be informed? What's wrong with you?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:40 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Do you not want to pay money to The Advocate or the NY Times to be informed? What's wrong with you?
I do not want to pay them.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 4:42 pm to dstone12
Oh come on man, those journalists' cat food isn't going to buy itself.

Popular
Back to top

2









