- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pretty funny by Guilbeau
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yeah, it has big boy words like "could" and "bias" that you could have easily gone to your online dictionary and not made a fool of yourself.
The fact that you haven't been able to put forth any type of coherent argument, answer any of my many question nor post without insulting me says it all.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You don't even know what the conversation was, do you? Went into full bitch mode and forgot where you were.
What? I know what the conversation was. You keep saying that both qbs could have won that bama game an be undefeated if they played the whole time. But I really disagree with you when it comes to that bama game because lee did not look like he could put lsu in a position to win.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:12 pm to TigerFan55555
Obviously I wasn't speaking to OBUDAN with that sentence. Use some common sense, please.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:14 pm to jturn17
I think because you replied to one of my posts he assumed you were saying that about me.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:15 pm to OBUDan
quote:
The fact that you haven't been able to put forth any type of coherent argument, answer any of my many question nor post without insulting me says it all.
Do you even remember why you are arguing? I highly doubt you do. You already linked something that proved you wrong once already.
Do you remember?
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:17 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
What? I know what the conversation was. You keep saying that both qbs could have won that bama game an be undefeated if they played the whole time.
quote:
But I really disagree with you when it comes to that bama game because lee did not look like he could put lsu in a position to win.
All LSU had to do was score 6 points. Anyone could have put LSU in that position in one single play. 2/3rds of the game was left. You seem to think 6 pts is a helluva lot.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
All LSU had to do was score 6 points. Anyone could have put LSU in that position in one single play. 2/3rds of the game was left. You seem to think 6 pts is a helluva lot.
They also had to do things like control the clock and be trusted not to turn the ball over. Jefferson did a good job with this by having successful option plays and scrambling for a few first downs.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:31 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
They also had to do things like control the clock
Say what??? The Bama game?
quote:
and be trusted not to turn the ball over.
Either QB may or may not have turned it over again.
quote:
Jefferson did a good job with this by having successful option plays and scrambling for a few first downs.
He did OK, but it has nothing to do with the conversation. You are incapable of separating your bias from this conversation.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:31 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
They also had to do things like control the clock and be trusted not to turn the ball over. Jefferson did a good job with this by having successful option plays and scrambling for a few first downs.
don't say that to rogertheshrubber. He has what you call "the football intelligence". If you don't believe it just ask him.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:34 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
They also had to do things like control the clock and be trusted not to turn the ball over. Jefferson did a good job with this by having successful option plays and scrambling for a few first downs.
don't say that to rogertheshrubber. He has what you call "the football intelligence". If you don't believe it just ask him.
Too bad you got your feelings hurt instead of actually reading and contributing to the conversation.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You are incapable of separating your bias from this conversation.
Eh, you are obsessed with the term bias. I feel JJ gave us the best chance to win that particular game. From what we saw, I really felt lee wasn't helping us win.
That game only. No bias. I like the rotation we had at qb before last night's game.
I think you are making a broad brush judgement about who is biased about things.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:40 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Eh, you are obsessed with the term bias.
It's pretty crucial to the whole converation.
quote:
I feel JJ gave us the best chance to win that particular game.
Has nothing to do with the point.
quote:
From what we saw, I really felt lee wasn't helping us win.
Has nothing to do with the point.
quote:
That game only. No bias. I like the rotation we had at qb before last night's game.
Has nothing to do with the point.
quote:
I think you are making a broad brush judgement about who is biased about things.
You can't stay on topic. You are biased in this situation.
Both QB's could have won this game had the other not been available. LSU could be 10-0 with only one of these guys. Either one. There is no reason to believe either were incapable of putting 6 on the board.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:43 pm to RogerTheShrubber
i just want you to impart some knowledge to me. such as:
when you reply back "say what?? the bama game?" what do you mean?
Lee had already turned it over twice on two consecutive passes.
I know anything can happen in the future, but should we not look at what just took place as an indicator of what is more likely to happen in the future? Jefferson didn't turn the ball over once in that game.
not to dwell on the bias part of it, but isn't the ability to scramble and have some success on option plays a good thing? Seemed to work to some extent against Bama when nothing else was.
thanking you in advance for your "football intelligence"
quote:
They also had to do things like control the clock
Say what??? The Bama game?
when you reply back "say what?? the bama game?" what do you mean?
quote:
and be trusted not to turn the ball over.
Either QB may or may not have turned it over again.
Lee had already turned it over twice on two consecutive passes.
I know anything can happen in the future, but should we not look at what just took place as an indicator of what is more likely to happen in the future? Jefferson didn't turn the ball over once in that game.
quote:
Jefferson did a good job with this by having successful option plays and scrambling for a few first downs.
He did OK, but it has nothing to do with the conversation. You are incapable of separating your bias from this conversation.
not to dwell on the bias part of it, but isn't the ability to scramble and have some success on option plays a good thing? Seemed to work to some extent against Bama when nothing else was.
thanking you in advance for your "football intelligence"
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Both QB's could have won this game had the other not been available.
by the emphasis on the word could, do you mean that anything is possible? The moon could be made out of cheese. We can't prove that it's not because neither of us have been there to taste it.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:46 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
Lee had already turned it over twice on two consecutive passes.
quote:
I know anything can happen in the future,
quote:
but should we not look at what just took place as an indicator of what is more likely to happen in the future?
All that was needed was 6 points. Go to a low risk game plan. If its three in a row, the coaching staff sucks.
quote:
Jefferson didn't turn the ball over once in that game.
Has nothing to do with the point.
quote:
not to dwell on the bias part of it, but isn't the ability to scramble and have some success on option plays a good thing? Seemed to work to some extent against Bama when nothing else was.
Has nothing to do with the point. You are veering off subject yet again due to your bias.
quote:
thanking you in advance for your "common sense"
You still have some learning to do.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:47 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
by the emphasis on the word could, do you mean that anything is possible?
Are you seriously telling me it took you this fricking long to figure out what the word "could" actually means???? In this case, scoring 6 points?
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:53 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
In this case, scoring 6 points?
it's not just about scoring 6 points. It's about winning the game. Things such as maintaining some drives and not turning the ball over are equally as important. Why do you keep obsessing on the 6 points? and I'm not saying that Lee could not have done those things. Just didn't look like it at the time. Maybe the moon is made out of cheese.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Are you seriously telling me it took you this fricking long to figure out what the word "could" actually means????
the moon could be made out of cheese. The earth could be flat. LSU could have beat Bama with Lee at QB. Yes, I guess I understand now.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:56 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
it's not just about scoring 6 points. It's about winning the game.
In this case, 6 pts. Thanks for verifying.
quote:
Things such as maintaining some drives and not turning the ball over are equally as important
True, part of football. LSU has done this well all year long. Nothing to disagree with.
quote:
. Why do you keep obsessing on the 6 points?
That's how many both LSU and Bama scored in regulation???
quote:
and I'm not saying that Lee could not have done those things.
Well holy shite, what the hell are you arguing for? Its the whole fricking argument.
quote:
Just didn't look like it at the time. Maybe the moon is made out of cheese.
Yeah, well you kind of outdid yourself here. Arguing for pages and finally turn over. Did you really not realize what this discussion was all about?
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 11/13/11 at 10:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I understand what you are arguing but the 6 point thing you are harping on doesn't make much sense.
You can't assume that lsu would only need to score 6 pts in reg to win If both qbs had the opportunity to play all the snaps.
The situations would change. The game would be altered because of the performance of each qb.
You can't assume that lsu would only need to score 6 pts in reg to win If both qbs had the opportunity to play all the snaps.
The situations would change. The game would be altered because of the performance of each qb.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 10:01 pm
Popular
Back to top


1



