- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Orgeron: It's going to look different, because it is different
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:02 am to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:02 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
It’s better to score? Of course it is,
I dunno brother. Tell that to Shrubber. He's having some difficulty with this idea of scoring being beneficial for your chances of winning.
1
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:02 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It's been a long time since college but losing by 39 seems less competitive?
In a three year span, is losing all three games to the same opponent 63-10 being competitive?
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 12:06 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:03 am to Goldrush25
quote:
said that I believe that scoring gives you a better chance of winning than not scoring.
quote:
In your opinion 56-17 gives you a better shot at winning?
Call me crazy but when you answer yes to this intend to take you atvyourcword
This was the conversation at the time
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:03 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
At least we aren't losing to Ole Miss and Arkansas multiple years
You right. Losing to Troy, a undermanned Florida twice, Mississippi State for the second time in a decade and in a blowout, and Texas A&M for the first time since they joined the SEC is so much better.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
I prefer to score, period.
You prefer not to as long as the margin of loss is smaller.
You prefer not to as long as the margin of loss is smaller.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:04 am to Goldrush25
quote:
He's having some difficulty with this idea of scoring being beneficial for your chances of winning.
You're having trouble realizing you agreed 39 pt loss is better than 29 if you score in the former
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:05 am to Goldrush25
[quote]ou mean scoring? Yes I think that scoring gives you a better chance of winning than not scoring. That is a wacky concept but I'm sticking to it. [/quote
You are just creating a giant straw man. The bottom line is you’d be no happier if we lost 56-17 than 29-0, saying in the former “ we had a greater chance because at least we scored is worse than moral victories
You are just creating a giant straw man. The bottom line is you’d be no happier if we lost 56-17 than 29-0, saying in the former “ we had a greater chance because at least we scored is worse than moral victories
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:07 am to LSU Groupee
quote:
You right. Losing to Troy, a undermanned Florida twice, Mississippi State for the second time in a decade and in a blowout, and Texas A&M for the first time since they joined the SEC is so much better
You forget Shrubs thinks Troy was more talented than LSU.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 12:07 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:07 am to Goldrush25
quote:
I prefer to score, period.
I understand
You'll take a much worse loss as long as we can score a few points
Band people tend to view football in this warped way.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:08 am to LSU Groupee
quote:
You right
Of course I am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Band people tend to view football in this warped way.
Is losing every game in a three year span to the same opponent, 63-10 being competitive?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:09 am to Goldrush25
quote:
You prefer not to as long as the margin of loss is smaller.
Most if us would. You're wanting a participation trophy
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 12:10 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:13 am to RogerTheShrubber
No answer?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:14 am to la_birdman
quote:
Is losing every game in a three year span to the same opponent, 63-10 being competitive?
No. 10-0 was competitive
What does that have to do with 2019?
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 12:18 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:15 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
now a pumper?
Anyone thinking 5-3 is acceptable and pumping the LSU offense to be top ten next season is a pumper.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:16 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No
Who's to blame for LSU for not being competitive in those 3 games?
quote:
What does that have to do with 2019?
If history is any indication, then this coming season, vs Bama, could very well be more of the same.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 12:18 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:17 am to LSU Groupee
quote:
Anyone thinking 5-3 is acceptable and pumping the LSU offense to be top ten next season is a pumper.
I'm sorry I'm a fan if the LSU football team and expect a better offense next year. I can see it bothers you terribly, I'll try to be more sensitive to your issues
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:19 am to la_birdman
quote:
Who's to blame for LSU for not being competitive in those 3 games?
Are you saying 10-0 isn't competitive? If so, you're wrong
In 2017 we outgained them and was within 7 until the 4th
Is that competitive?
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 12:21 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:21 am to LSU Groupee
quote:
You right. Losing to Troy, a undermanned Florida twice, Mississippi State for the second time in a decade and in a blowout, and Texas A&M for the first time since they joined the SEC is so much better.
?
dont you love when they act like 2015 ole miss was garbage?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:23 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Are you saying 10-0 isn't competitive?
I just asked you who's to blame for us not being competitive in a 3 year span losing 63-10 overall.
You said "No." So who's to blame for those results?
quote:
Are you saying 10-0 isn't competitive? If so, you're wrong
Ok then. Is losing 29-0 being competitive?
Page 43 of 66
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News