- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Offensive breakdown from 2005-2012 and 3 questions
Posted on 2/10/13 at 7:17 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Posted on 2/10/13 at 7:17 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
01. What are the reasons for the decided gap between 2005-2008 and 2009-2012? Was it primarily Perrilloux getting kicked off, and an ill-prepared freshman Lee taking over (Jarret finished ranked 83rd with a 115.7 QB rating. 13/16 TD/Int ratio) and then Jefferson who, quite frankly, had zero pocket presence, and had difficulties making a 2nd read. Was it Saban's recruits were gone? Simply poor QB development/recruiting?
We used our projected 3rd string RS freshman QB in '08. Reality is Lee and Jefferson were average QBs from '08-11. They weren't great. Each had abilities to make some plays, but neither was ever going to develop into an ALL-SEC type player.
quote:
02. Based on more passing yards than rushing in 2012 could it be said the staff wanted to pass more? It seemed to me LSU wanted to pass every game but due pass protection breakdowns, injuries, Receivers simply dropping the ball, etc, they were forced to run often.
Yes. Everyone was screaming for more passing. They got it. Problem is the pass protection was rough all year due to losing 3 starting OL during the season.
quote:
For 2013 do you see a 50/50 pass/rush ratio as a distinct possibility with a 'Total Offense' rank around 40?
Possible, but probably not that high. At best I think LSU will be around 50-60, because of their style of play. Teams that run hurry up and spread offenses will have higher ranked offenses than LSU. Especially considering LSU gets to play UGA and Florida out of the SECE as well as TCU in OOC. If LSU finishes in the top 60 overall offense yardage we will be playing for the SECC in December, because our schedule is brutal in 2013. That said, I do think you see 50/50 run/pass out of the offense this year.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 7:21 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
Even if he wins a NC however, I still don't like Les.
+1
Posted on 2/10/13 at 7:23 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
Even if he wins a NC however, I still don't like Les.
been posting it for awhile now that there is a contingent of LSU fans that will be unhappy with Les no matter what he does and I was trolled for it. Thank you for the proof.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 7:23 pm to Tigahs
Good to see you, Tigahs.
Are you still working in the green energy business?
Are you still working in the green energy business?
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:10 pm to Football_Freak
quote:
IN THE FIRST-THRU-3RD QTRS.
I hear ya, and yes probably more accurate. Maybe not 3 quarters but when a game is out of hand and the scrubs are put in. This can be done but game by game that is a hell of a lotta research.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:14 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
I still don't like Les.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 9:00 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Even if he never wins another NC I'll still like Les.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 9:42 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
an ill-prepared freshman Lee taking over (Jarret finished ranked 83rd with a 115.7 QB rating. 13/16 TD/Int ratio) and then Jefferson who, quite frankly, had zero pocket presence, and had difficulties making a 2nd read.
Goddamn it people are so fricking stupid and dishonest it is comical. You defend Lee's historically bad 2008 by saying he was "ill prepared" but criticize JJs 09 season even though he was INFINITELY better than Jarret Lee in 2008.
It is complete revisionist history to pretend otherwise.
Lee 2008 vs. JJ 2009
269 143 53.2 1873 7.0 14 16 116.92
296 182 61.5 2166 7.3 17 7 137.18
If you would just look at the numbers in your own damn thread and not ignore your own fricking facts, you'd see that in 2009 not only did we win 2 more games in the regular season, but only threw for 200 yards less, and JJ threw for 300 MORE than Lee, 3 more TDs, NINE less INTs, and had a better rating.
The problem with 2009 was that our OL was the worst I've seen since 1999. We ran for 600 yards LESS in 09 than in 08. That was the problem in 09, not JJ or the passing game.
Now, in 2010, JJ was horrible, excluding the UNC, Bama, Ole Miss, and A&M games. I'm not sure what the difference was there, other than Crowton sticking around after Krag decided to take a year off and it was clear that neither he nor Miles were happy that he was still there.
People always picked a favorite between JJ and Lee, and most switched allegiances at one point or another because pretty much EVERYONE HATED Lee in 2008, but I never cheered for one over the other.
I wanted the best QB to play, and in 2009, that was without question JJ.
No need to rewrite history based on Lee out performing JJ in 2011.
This post was edited on 2/10/13 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 2/10/13 at 10:39 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
No need to rewrite history based on Lee out performing JJ in 2011.
Not rewriting...my opinion on what I saw. Lee wasn't prepared. I guess to satisfy you, I could have continued with "Senior Lee, with a strong D, ST, OL, run game and receivers, did well till the UA game where he basically curled up in a fetal position with a deer-in-the-headlights look'...which is true and why he lost his starting job. Jefferson had zero pocket presence and barely could make a 2nd read, which is also true. If anything Jefferson wasn't utilized properly. He would have been a great option QB with a sufficient passing threat to keep D's honest. He was never a good drop back QB.
Reading your post a 2nd time, the JJ/Lee thing seems kind of personal. Not everyone has an axe to grind man.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 10:56 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
I can assure you there is nothing personal on my end. I've always supported both Lee and JJ, and saw them both as players with decent potential that was wasted by Gary Crowton as both got worse the longer they played under him.
But Jefferson had a very solid season in 09. A lot of us, myself included, tend to blur 08,09,and 2010 into a mess that we'd like to forget on our offense, but JJ was surprisingly good in 09 except for the Florida game.
That was unfortunately the biggest game of the year in primetime in BR against Tebow's defending national champs and the one everyone remembers the most along with the last series against Ole Miss which was when people truly started losing their minds about how bad the O had gotten.
But that game was the exception for JJ that year. The running game and OL was what killed our O all season, not to mention the beginning of Crowton's insane obsession with the short side option. This was even more frustrating considering JJ was LEAST effective running the option. He was a much better passer than runner in 09.
Strangely enough, JJ got better at running the option in 2010 because he had clearly worked on it all offseason. He clearly focused all his work on that, because his passing went WAY down from 09 to 2010.
Yet another example of Crowton failing to adapt his system and identify what his players do well leading to regression in his players.
I just don't like when people forget or twist history. Everyone is quick to say Lee was just not ready or blame the D in 08, but JJ doesn't get that same treatment about our awful OL and running game in 09.
Take a look at his numbers and you'll probably be surprised.
LINK
If you're not axe grinding, my apologies. You just may need a reminder as to how 09 actually went down
But Jefferson had a very solid season in 09. A lot of us, myself included, tend to blur 08,09,and 2010 into a mess that we'd like to forget on our offense, but JJ was surprisingly good in 09 except for the Florida game.
That was unfortunately the biggest game of the year in primetime in BR against Tebow's defending national champs and the one everyone remembers the most along with the last series against Ole Miss which was when people truly started losing their minds about how bad the O had gotten.
But that game was the exception for JJ that year. The running game and OL was what killed our O all season, not to mention the beginning of Crowton's insane obsession with the short side option. This was even more frustrating considering JJ was LEAST effective running the option. He was a much better passer than runner in 09.
Strangely enough, JJ got better at running the option in 2010 because he had clearly worked on it all offseason. He clearly focused all his work on that, because his passing went WAY down from 09 to 2010.
Yet another example of Crowton failing to adapt his system and identify what his players do well leading to regression in his players.
I just don't like when people forget or twist history. Everyone is quick to say Lee was just not ready or blame the D in 08, but JJ doesn't get that same treatment about our awful OL and running game in 09.
Take a look at his numbers and you'll probably be surprised.
LINK
If you're not axe grinding, my apologies. You just may need a reminder as to how 09 actually went down
This post was edited on 2/10/13 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:13 pm to Tiger Voodoo
I think Les lost trust in his OC's during the 2008 Lee debacle and never trusted his OC's since. Last year and 2011, the offense looked like an elementary design of an offense. It was masked in 2011 by the great playmaking ability of Randle. The problem became more obvious this year. The uncreative play designs and terrible calls did us in.
The stats prove that Les, while a good recruiter, is not a good offensive mind, he should leave that up to his OC.
The stats prove that Les, while a good recruiter, is not a good offensive mind, he should leave that up to his OC.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:20 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:Well Doc it's strange I can't recall any spread, or read option , until The Wiz arrived '07.
Miles took over the offense and effectively moved it away from being more pro-style and flexible, and created a whole new offense around JJ. This should be obvious to everyone. So it just wasn't the individual players that hurt the offense (as the 2008 numbers show); it was the system itself.
You do know that was his MO and implemented at numerous stops prior to LSU and after? (poor Danny boy)
Now just where was it Miles run the spread and read before arriving at LSU?
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:33 pm to josh336
quote:
The stats prove that Les, while a good recruiter, is not a good offensive mind,
I can see you've put a lot of thought into this.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:54 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
But Jefferson had a very solid season in 09
It was ok, except for throwing short of the sticks constantly (no progression) and poor pocket presence. Not sure all of that was his fault. Lee wouldn't have done any better though.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:56 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
A lot of us, myself included, tend to blur 08,09,and 2010 into a mess that we'd like to forget on our offense, but JJ was surprisingly good in 09 except for the Florida game.
Well, I agree about blurring seasons together. they are all different each with it's own set of obstacles. Fair enough regarding UF game. I suppose my main point of the OP is the misnomer regarding Miles and the O. The idea he wants to run it 65 times, there is no imagination, etc. I think it is much more important the personnel and staff. Really looking forward to 2013 season, 100 times more than after the Clemson game, very excited.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 12:01 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:I posted similar yesterday, adding the ones who think '08 wasn't so bad aren't considering 18 INTs worth of points off TOs LSU gave up, and the pressure put on a defense with the resulting field position.
The problem with 2009 was that our OL was the worst I've seen since 1999. We ran for 600 yards LESS in 09 than in 08. That was the problem in 09, not JJ or the passing game.
The '09 D actually gave up more yardage than '08, prolly due to opponents actually having to drive down the field to score.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 12:02 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
. I suppose my main point of the OP is the misnomer regarding Miles and the O. The idea he wants to run it 65 times, there is no imagination, etc. I think it is much more important the personnel and staff. Really looking forward to 2013 season
Well shite man you won't find any disagreement on that with me.
I have every confidence that the O was finally ready to shake off the rust from the dark period of Crowton/JJ/Lee, and I felt that even before the Cam hiring.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 4:08 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
Goddamn it people are so fricking stupid and dishonest it is comical. You defend Lee's historically bad 2008 by saying he was "ill prepared" but criticize JJs 09 season even though he was INFINITELY better than Jarret Lee in 2008.
It is complete revisionist history to pretend otherwise.
You are so full of shite.
The biggest line of revisionist bullshite in the entire history of the Rant is the argument saying that JJ had a decent 2009. Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, was fricking saying this in November 2009, and that's before the putrid offensive performance at Ole Miss occurred, Jack.
You have some poster in here talking about how JJ didn't have Charles Scott in '09 (which is obviously false), and then all these people talking about how much worse the O-line got in '09 than in '08. Oh really?
I remember that argument from 2009. Everybody threw Hebert & Dworaczyk under the bus for the entire offense's failures so that they wouldn't have to face the unimaginable--i.e., that Lee wasn't actually that bad. In this imaginary realm, Herman Johnson was supposed to be some awesome superstar at OG, and somehow people just forgot how bad Helms got tossed around like a rag doll by defenders from top defenses in 2008.
I consistently said this through 2009, and I'll say it again now: the 2009 passing offense was the worst LSU has had in the last decade. I laid it out in detail in terms of yards per pass play many times.
In his entire playing history, Jarrett Lee has one loss on his shoulders, and that's the game against #1 Alabama in 2008 that went to OT. For the season in general, he got hung out to dry by the coaching staff when he was asked to roll the dice in order to try to make up for Mallveto's deficiencies. That's what he was programmed to do given the situation he found himself in. Now I've got no problem at all with this approach if you're going to stick with him through it all. If you want to throw a freshmen into the fire to give yourself the best shot at pulling out improbable wins, then go ahead and do that. Seeking moral victories and protecting your QB in order to "do better next year" is pussified.
The problem is that after having made the decision to throw him into the very fire that could have steeled him and made him into the man at LSU for the rest of his career, Miles immediately turned around and dishonorably threw him under the bus as a scapegoat--this, after he just got finished putting up way more passing numbers than anyone could have reasonably expected for a freshman QB who was #3 on the depth chart the previous spring. (In his entire time at LSU, he never went through spring practice getting the most reps with the #1 offensive unit.) People who think he was the main problem in 2008 are just plain idiots. Always were, always will be. The same goes for people who think JJ was a decent QB in 2009. Either that or they are just too damn old to remember what actually happened.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 4:14 am
Posted on 2/11/13 at 4:20 am to Doc Fenton
Lee wasn't good. Neither was Jefferson.
end of debate
end of debate
Popular
Back to top


0






